Literature DB >> 22050654

Global source-receptor relationships for mercury deposition under present-day and 2050 emissions scenarios.

Elizabeth S Corbitt1, Daniel J Jacob, Christopher D Holmes, David G Streets, Elsie M Sunderland.   

Abstract

Global policies regulating anthropogenic mercury require an understanding of the relationship between emitted and deposited mercury on intercontinental scales. Here, we examine source-receptor relationships for present-day conditions and four 2050 IPCC scenarios encompassing a range of economic development and environmental regulation projections. We use the GEOS-Chem global model to track mercury from its point of emission through rapid cycling in surface ocean and land reservoirs to its accumulation in longer lived ocean and soil pools. Deposited mercury has a local component (emitted Hg(II), lifetime of 3.7 days against deposition) and a global component (emitted Hg(0), lifetime of 6 months against deposition). Fast recycling of deposited mercury through photoreduction of Hg(II) and re-emission of Hg(0) from surface reservoirs (ice, land, surface ocean) increases the effective lifetime of anthropogenic mercury to 9 months against loss to legacy reservoirs (soil pools and the subsurface ocean). This lifetime is still sufficiently short that source-receptor relationships have a strong hemispheric signature. Asian emissions are the largest source of anthropogenic deposition to all ocean basins, though there is also regional source influence from upwind continents. Current anthropogenic emissions account for only about one-third of mercury deposition to the global ocean with the remainder from natural and legacy sources. However, controls on anthropogenic emissions would have the added benefit of reducing the legacy mercury re-emitted to the atmosphere. Better understanding is needed of the time scales for transfer of mercury from active pools to stable geochemical reservoirs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22050654      PMCID: PMC3246401          DOI: 10.1021/es202496y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  19 in total

1.  On the effect of spatial resolution on atmospheric mercury modeling.

Authors:  Christian Seigneur; Prakash Karamchandani; Krish Vijayaraghavan; Kristen Lohman; Run-Lie Shia; Leonard Levin
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2003-03-20       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Processes influencing rainfall deposition of mercury in Florida.

Authors:  J L Guentzel; W M Landing; G A Gill; C D Pollman
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  All-time releases of mercury to the atmosphere from human activities.

Authors:  David G Streets; Molly K Devane; Zifeng Lu; Tami C Bond; Elsie M Sunderland; Daniel J Jacob
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Modern and historic atmospheric mercury fluxes in northern Alaska: Global sources and Arctic depletion.

Authors:  William F Fitzgerald; Daniel R Engstrom; Carl H Lamborg; Chun-Mao Tseng; Prentiss H Balcom; Chad R Hammerschmidt
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Gross photoreduction kinetics of mercury in temperate freshwater lakes and rivers: application to a general model of DGM dynamics.

Authors:  N J O'Driscoll; S D Siciliano; D R S Lean; M Amyot
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Modeling mercury in power plant plumes.

Authors:  Kristen Lohman; Christian Seigneur; Eric Edgerton; John Jansen
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Response of a macrotidal estuary to changes in anthropogenic mercury loading between 1850 and 2000.

Authors:  Elsie M Sunderland; John Dalziel; Andrew Heyes; Brian A Branfireun; David P Krabbenhoft; Frank A P C Gobas
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Atmospherc mercury deposition during the last 270 years: a glacial ice core record of natural and anthropogenic sources.

Authors:  Paul F Schuster; David P Krabbenhoft; David L Naftz; L Dewayne Cecil; Mark L Olson; John F Dewild; David D Susong; Jaromy R Green; Micheal L Abbott
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Sorption and stability of mercury on activated carbon for emission control.

Authors:  John W Graydon; Xinzhi Zhang; Donald W Kirk; Charles Q Jia
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 10.588

10.  Reactivity and mobility of new and old mercury deposition in a boreal forest ecosystem during the first year of the METAALICUS study. Mercury Experiment To Assess Atmospheric Loading In Canada and the US.

Authors:  Holger Hintelmann; Reed Harris; Andrew Heyes; James P Hurley; Carol A Kelly; David P Krabbenhoft; Steve Lindberg; John W M Rudd; Karen J Scott; Vincent L St Louis
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2002-12-01       Impact factor: 9.028

View more
  10 in total

1.  Half a century of changing mercury levels in Swedish freshwater fish.

Authors:  Staffan Akerblom; Anders Bignert; Markus Meili; Lars Sonesten; Marcus Sundbom
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 5.129

2.  Benefits of mercury controls for the United States.

Authors:  Amanda Giang; Noelle E Selin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Mercury biogeochemical cycling in the ocean and policy implications.

Authors:  Robert P Mason; Anna L Choi; William F Fitzgerald; Chad R Hammerschmidt; Carl H Lamborg; Anne L Soerensen; Elsie M Sunderland
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 6.498

4.  Mercury in Arctic marine ecosystems: sources, pathways and exposure.

Authors:  Jane L Kirk; Igor Lehnherr; Maria Andersson; Birgit M Braune; Laurie Chan; Ashu P Dastoor; Dorothy Durnford; Amber L Gleason; Lisa L Loseto; Alexandra Steffen; Vincent L St Louis
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 6.498

5.  Mercury sources and fate in the Gulf of Maine.

Authors:  Elsie M Sunderland; Aria Amirbahman; Neil M Burgess; John Dalziel; Gareth Harding; Stephen H Jones; Elizabeth Kamai; Margaret R Karagas; Xun Shi; Celia Y Chen
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 6.498

Review 6.  Global Sources and Pathways of Mercury in the Context of Human Health.

Authors:  Kyrre Sundseth; Jozef M Pacyna; Elisabeth G Pacyna; Nicola Pirrone; Rebecca J Thorne
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-01-22       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Trans-provincial health impacts of atmospheric mercury emissions in China.

Authors:  Long Chen; Sai Liang; Maodian Liu; Yujun Yi; Zhifu Mi; Yanxu Zhang; Yumeng Li; Jianchuan Qi; Jing Meng; Xi Tang; Haoran Zhang; Yindong Tong; Wei Zhang; Xuejun Wang; Jiong Shu; Zhifeng Yang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Influence of global climate change on chemical fate and bioaccumulation: the role of multimedia models.

Authors:  Todd Gouin; James M Armitage; Ian T Cousins; Derek C G Muir; Carla A Ng; Liisa Reid; Shu Tao
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.742

9.  Mercury as a global pollutant: sources, pathways, and effects.

Authors:  Charles T Driscoll; Robert P Mason; Hing Man Chan; Daniel J Jacob; Nicola Pirrone
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Particulate-phase mercury emissions from biomass burning and impact on resulting deposition: a modelling assessment.

Authors:  Francesco De Simone; Paulo Artaxo; Mariantonia Bencardino; Sergio Cinnirella; Francesco Carbone; Francesco D'Amore; Aurélien Dommergue; Xin Bin Feng; Christian N Gencarelli; Ian M Hedgecock; Matthew S Landis; Francesca Sprovieri; Noriuki Suzuki; Ingvar Wängberg; Nicola Pirrone
Journal:  Atmos Chem Phys       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 6.133

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.