Literature DB >> 2204961

Cavitation effects during lithotripsy. Part I. Results of in vitro experiments.

R K Zeman1, W J Davros, B S Garra, S C Horii.   

Abstract

Cavitation effects and microbubble formation are due to the rarefactive (negative pressure) component of shock waves. The in vitro application of shock waves generated by a commercial lithotriptor to an anthropomorphic phantom showed that stone fragmentation occurred more completely in fluid media that support cavitation than in a solid agar-graphite gel. Various fluids (saline, iodinated contrast material, bile) supported different degrees of cavitation. Bile exhibited cavitation at low energy and gave rise to intense microbubble formation at 19 kV. Cavitation increased dramatically with an increase in the rate of generation from 1.0 to 1.8 shock waves per second. The authors conclude that during biliary lithotripsy the environment of a stone will influence the extent of cavitation and fragmentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2204961     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.177.1.2204961

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  7 in total

1.  Adjuncts to improve outcomes of shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Peter L Steinberg; Steven Williams; David M Hoenig
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Passive cavitation imaging with ultrasound arrays.

Authors:  Vasant A Salgaonkar; Saurabh Datta; Christy K Holland; T Douglas Mast
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Turbulent water coupling in shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Jaclyn Lautz; Georgy Sankin; Pei Zhong
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Hepatic cavitation. A marker of transient hepatocellular injury during biliary lithotripsy.

Authors:  L E Forer; W J Davros; J Goldberg; F al-Kawas; B S Garra; W Hayes; R K Zeman
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Optimal shock wave rate for shock wave lithotripsy in urolithiasis treatment: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Keun Bai Moon; Go San Lim; Jae Seung Hwang; Chae Hong Lim; Jae Won Lee; Jeong Hwan Son; Seok Heun Jang
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2012-11-14

6.  Comparison between two shock wave regimens using frequencies of 60 and 90 impulses per minute for urinary stones.

Authors:  Eduardo Mazzucchi; Artur H Brito; Alexandre Danilovic; Gustavo X Ebaid; Elias Chedid Neto; José Reinaldo Franco de Azevedo; Miguel Srougi
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.365

7.  Evaluation of the optimal frequency of and pretreatment with shock waves in patients with renal stones.

Authors:  Jong Yeon Lee; Young Tae Moon
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2011-11-17
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.