Literature DB >> 22045022

A conceptual framework for future research on mode of delivery.

Jennifer M Wu1, Meera Viswanathan, Julie S Ivy.   

Abstract

Our goal was to develop a comprehensive conceptual research framework on mode of delivery and to identify research priorities in this topic area through a Delphi process. We convened a multidisciplinary team of 16 experts (North Carolina Collaborative on Mode of Delivery) representing the fields of obstetrics and gynecology, neonatology, midwifery, epidemiology, psychometrics, decision sciences, bioethics, health care engineering, health economics, health disparities, and women's studies. We finalized the conceptual framework after multiple iterations, including revisions during a one-day in-person conference. The conceptual framework illustrates the causal pathway for mode of delivery and the complex interplay and relationships among patient, fetal, family, provider, cultural, and societal factors as drivers of change from intended to actual mode of delivery. This conceptual framework on mode of delivery will help put specific research ideas into a broader context and identify important knowledge gaps for future investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22045022     DOI: 10.1007/s10995-011-0910-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  5 in total

1.  From risk factors to explanation in public health.

Authors:  Ian McDowell
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 2.341

2.  National Institutes of Health state-of-the-science conference statement: Cesarean delivery on maternal request March 27-29, 2006.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Births: final data for 2007.

Authors:  Joyce A Martin; Brady E Hamilton; Paul D Sutton; Stephanie J Ventura; T J Mathews; Sharon Kirmeyer; Michelle J K Osterman
Journal:  Natl Vital Stat Rep       Date:  2010-08-09

Review 4.  Cesarean delivery on maternal request: maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Authors:  Anthony G Visco; Meera Viswanathan; Kathleen N Lohr; Mary Ellen Wechter; Gerald Gartlehner; Jennifer M Wu; Rachel Palmieri; Michele Jonsson Funk; Linda Lux; Tammeka Swinson; Katherine Hartmann
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  ACOG Committee Opinion No. 394, December 2007. Cesarean delivery on maternal request.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 7.661

  5 in total
  3 in total

1.  Prevalence and factors associated with caesarean section in Rwanda: a trend analysis of Rwanda demographic and health survey 2000 to 2019-20.

Authors:  Peter M Kibe; Grace Wambura Mbuthia; Duncan N Shikuku; Catherine Akoth; James Odhiambo Oguta; Loise Ng'ang'a; Samwel Maina Gatimu
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 3.105

2.  Socioeconomic position early in adolescence and mode of delivery later in life: findings from a Portuguese birth cohort.

Authors:  Cristina Teixeira; Susana Silva; Milton Severo; Henrique Barros
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Development of strategies to reduce cesarean delivery rates in iran 2012-2014: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Razieh Lotfi; Fahimeh Ramezani Tehrani; Marzieh Rostami Dovom; Farahnaz Torkestani; Mehrandokht Abedini; Sima Sajedinejad
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2014-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.