Literature DB >> 22043807

Efficient production and cellular characterization of sheep androgenetic embryos.

Federica Zacchini1, Marta Czernik, Domenico Iuso, Paola Toschi, Fiorella di Egidio, Pier Augusto Scapolo, Pasqualino Loi, Grazyna Ptak.   

Abstract

The production of androgenetic embryos in large animals is a complex procedure. Androgenetic embryos have been produced so far only in cattle and sheep using pronuclear transfer (PT) between zygotes derived from in vitro fertilization (IVF) of previously enucleated oocytes. PT is required due to the poor developmental potential of androgenotes derived from IVF of enucleated oocytes. Here we compare the developemt to blastocyst of androgenetic embryos produced by the standard pronuclear transfer and by fertilization of oocytes enucleated in Ca2+/Mg2+-free medium, without pronuclear transfer. The enucleation in Ca2+/Mg2+-free medium abolished almost completely the manipulation-induced activation, significantly improving the development to blastocyst of the androgenetic embryos (IVF followed by PT; 18.6%: IVF only; 17.7%, respectively). Karyotype analysis of IVF revealed a similar proportion of diploid embryos in androgenetic and control blastocysts (35% and 36%, respectively), although mixoploid blastocysts were frequently observed in both groups (64%). Androgenotes had lower total cell numbers than control and parthenogenetic embryos, but more cells in ICM cells comparing to parthenogenotes (30.42 vs. 17.15%). Higher expression of the pluripotency-associated gene NANOG, and trophoblastic-specific gene CDX2, were also observed in androgenotes compared to parthenogenotes and controls. The global methytion profile of androgenetic embryos was comparable to controls, but was lower than parthenogenetic embryos. The cell composition and methylation pattern we have detected in monoparental sheep monoparental embryos are unprecedented, and differ considerably from the standard reference mouse embryos. Altogether, these finding indicate significant differences across species in the molecular mechanisms regulating early development of monoparental embryos, and highlights the need to study postimplantation development of androgenetic embryos in sheep.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22043807      PMCID: PMC3229817          DOI: 10.1089/cell.2011.0021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Reprogram        ISSN: 2152-4971            Impact factor:   1.987


  35 in total

1.  Methylation reprogramming and chromosomal aneuploidy in in vivo fertilized and cloned rabbit preimplantation embryos.

Authors:  Wei Shi; Fatma Dirim; Eckhard Wolf; Valeri Zakhartchenko; Thomas Haaf
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2004-03-17       Impact factor: 4.285

Review 2.  Dosage balance in gene regulation: biological implications.

Authors:  James A Birchler; Nicole C Riddle; Donald L Auger; Reiner A Veitia
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 11.639

3.  Characterization of stretch-activated ion channels in Xenopus oocytes.

Authors:  X C Yang; F Sachs
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Investigation of chromosome aneuploidies in early porcine embryos using comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  M Hornak; P Hulinska; P Musilova; S Kubickova; J Rubes
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 1.636

5.  Development of parthenogenetic and cloned ovine embryos: effect of activation protocols.

Authors:  P Loi; S Ledda; J Fulka; P Cappai; R M Moor
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.285

6.  Completion of mouse embryogenesis requires both the maternal and paternal genomes.

Authors:  J McGrath; D Solter
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 7.  Stretch-activated ion channels: what are they?

Authors:  Frederick Sachs
Journal:  Physiology (Bethesda)       Date:  2010-02

8.  Occurrence of chromosomal aneuploidy in rabbit oocytes and embryos at different developmental stages.

Authors:  Jozef Curlej; Jozef Bulla; Peter Chrenek
Journal:  Zygote       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 1.442

9.  Simplified technique for differential staining of inner cell mass and trophectoderm cells of mouse and bovine blastocysts.

Authors:  G. A. Thouas; N. A. Korfiatis; A. J. French; G. M. Jones; A. O. Trounson
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.828

10.  Overexpression of Cdx2 inhibits progression of gastric cancer in vitro.

Authors:  Yubo Xie; Lei Li; Xiaotong Wang; Yi Qin; Qian Qian; Xizi Yuan; Qiang Xiao
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.650

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Genomic imprinting effects on complex traits in domesticated animal species.

Authors:  Alan M O'Doherty; David E MacHugh; Charles Spillane; David A Magee
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 2.  Genomic Imprinting in the New Omics Era: A Model for Systems-Level Approaches.

Authors:  Jean-Noël Hubert; Julie Demars
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 4.599

3.  Autophagy and apoptosis: parent-of-origin genome-dependent mechanisms of cellular self-destruction.

Authors:  Grazyna E Ptak; Paola Toschi; Antonella Fidanza; Marta Czernik; Federica Zacchini; Jacek A Modlinski; Pasqualino Loi
Journal:  Open Biol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 6.411

4.  Developmental peculiarities in placentae of ovine uniparental conceptuses.

Authors:  Roberta Arena; Federica Zacchini; Paola Toschi; Luca Palazzese; Marta Czernik; Grażyna Ewa Ptak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.