Literature DB >> 22043470

A proposed classification for zygomatic implant patient based on the zygoma anatomy guided approach (ZAGA): a cross-sectional survey.

Carlos Aparicio1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of the present cross-sectional study was to propose a classification system based on a cross-sectional survey of zygomatic implant cases.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cone beam computerised tomography (CBCT) postoperative images and clinical intra-surgery photographs of 200 sites corresponding to 100 patients, treated with a total of 198 zygomatic implants in the maxilla according to an anatomy-driven prosthetic approach, were reviewed with regard to anatomy and pathway of the zygomatic implant body. The patients were consecutively selected independently of the type of surgery performed, with the unique requirement of a post-surgical CBCT performed at the moment of selection. Of special interest was the morphology of the lateral sinus wall, residual alveolar crest and the zygomatic buttress. An attempt was made to divide the patients into groups, describing typical anatomies and implant pathways.
RESULTS: Five basic skeletal forms of the zygomatic buttress-alveolar crest complex and subsequent implant pathways could be identified in a sample of 100 patients. Out of them, 62% were female and 38% male, with ages varying between 36 and 83 years (mean age 59.6, SD: 9.67). The five groups were classified as ZAGA 0 to 4 representing 15%, 49%, 20.5%, 9% and 6.5% of the studied sites, respectively. Intra-individual anatomical differences affecting the zygomatic buttress-alveolar crest complex was also found in 58% of the patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Five typical anatomical and implant pathway situations could be identified. A classification system comprising five groups named ZAGA 0 to 4 is proposed. Anatomical intra-individual differences were also found in the 58% of the studied population. It is believed that the proposed classification system is useful for categorising zygomatic implant cases for therapy planning and for scientific follow-up purposes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22043470

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Oral Implantol        ISSN: 1756-2406            Impact factor:   3.123


  12 in total

Review 1.  Interventions for replacing missing teeth: dental implants in zygomatic bone for the rehabilitation of the severely deficient edentulous maxilla.

Authors:  Marco Esposito; Helen V Worthington
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-09-05

2.  Restoration of Atrophic Edentulous Maxilla of a Patient with Ectodermal Dysplasia Using Quadruple Zygomatic Implants: A Case Report.

Authors:  Gunaseelan Rajan; Saravanakumar Mariappan; Hariharan Ramasubramanian; Shanmugasundaram Somasundaram; Gowri Natarajarathinam
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2015-01-20

3.  Endoscopically-Assisted Zygomatic Implant Placement: A Novel Approach.

Authors:  Raúl González-García; Alberto Monje; Carlos Moreno-García; Florencio Monje
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2015-09-18

4.  Zygoma implants in oral rehabilitation: A review of 28 cases.

Authors:  Rowland Agbara; Elizabeth Goetze; Felix Koch; Wilfred Wagner
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec

5.  Zygomatic implant penetration to the central portion of orbit: a case report.

Authors:  Luan Mavriqi; Felice Lorusso; Roberto Conte; Biagio Rapone; Antonio Scarano
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 2.209

Review 6.  Zygomatic implants placed in atrophic maxilla: an overview of current systematic reviews and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shaqayeq Ramezanzade; Julian Yates; Frank J Tuminelli; Seied Omid Keyhan; Parisa Yousefi; Jose Lopez-Lopez
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2021-01-06

7.  Accuracy of digital planning in zygomatic implants.

Authors:  B Xing Gao; O Iglesias-Velázquez; F G F Tresguerres; A Rodríguez González Cortes; I F Tresguerres; R Ortega Aranegui; R M López-Pintor; J López-Quiles; J Torres
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-07-22

Review 8.  Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: An Evidence-Based Review.

Authors:  Robert Weiss; Andrew Read-Fuller
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2019-05-02

9.  Bone Regeneration and Soft Tissue Enhancement Around Zygomatic Implants: Retrospective Case Series.

Authors:  Peñarrocha-Diago M; Bernabeu-Mira Jc; Fernández-Ruíz A; Aparicio C; Peñarrocha-Oltra D
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-29       Impact factor: 3.623

10.  Evaluation of Quality of Life and Satisfaction in Patients with Fixed Prostheses on Zygomatic Implants Compared with the All-on-Four Concept: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Study.

Authors:  Juan Alberto Fernández-Ruiz; Mariano Sánchez-Siles; Yolanda Guerrero-Sánchez; Jesús Pato-Mourelo; Fabio Camacho-Alonso
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.