Literature DB >> 22043467

The rehabilitation of completely edentulous maxillae with different degrees of resorption with four or more immediately loaded implants: a 5-year retrospective study and a new classification.

Paulo Maló1, Miguel de Nobre, Armando Lopes.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report the long-term outcome of immediately loaded implants in the rehabilitations of completely edentulous maxillae with different classifications. The secondary aim was to evaluate the influence of possible explanatory variables on the incidence of biological and mechanical complications.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: In total, 221 patients were consecutively included and classified into four groups that allowed implant placement in a vertical position: Group 1 (bone available up to first molar), Group 2 (bone available up to second premolar), Group 3 (bone available up to first premolar) and Group 4 (bone available up to canine). Outcome measures were prosthesis and implant survival, and biological and mechanical complications.
RESULTS: A total of 995 implants were placed. Eighteen patients (8% of the sample) dropped out of the study. After 5 years, three patients lost their prosthesis due to implant failures, giving a survival rate of 98.6%; 25 patients lost 41 implants, giving a survival rate of 88.7% (25/221) and an implant-specific survival rate of 95.8% (41/995). According to the edentulism classification, the patient-specific survival rate after 5 years was 78.6% for Group 1, 89.3% for Group 2, 92.4% for Group 3 and 91.7% for Group 4. In total, 129 biological complications occurred affecting 129 implants (13%) in 66 patients (30%). Smoking was identified as a risk factor for the incidence of biological complications with an OR of 3.03 (95% CI 2.03-4.56; P < 0.0001), while 'gender' (male; OR = 0.56; 95% CI 0.37-0.85; P = 0.007) was a factor that had a protective effect. A total of 170 mechanical complications occurred, affecting 170 implants (17%) in 71 patients (38%). Bruxism was identified as a risk factor for the incidence of mechanical complications with an OR of 60.95 (95% CI 21.40-173.54; P < 0.0001), while a Group 2 edentulism classification had a protective effect for the incidence of mechanical complications with an OR of 0.22 (95% CI 0.07-0.71; P = 0.011).
CONCLUSIONS: It is a viable treatment option to rehabilitate completely edentulous maxillae using four implants or more to support a fixed prosthesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22043467

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Oral Implantol        ISSN: 1756-2406            Impact factor:   3.123


  8 in total

1.  Posterior maxillary implants inserted with bicortical anchorage and placed in immediate function for partial or complete edentulous rehabilitations. A retrospective clinical study with a median follow-up of 7 years.

Authors:  Paulo Maló; Miguel de Araújo Nobre; Armando Lopes; Steven Moss
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-02-28

2.  Occlusion for implant-supported fixed dental prostheses in partially edentulous patients: a literature review and current concepts.

Authors:  Judy Chia-Chun Yuan; Cortino Sukotjo
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 2.614

3.  Does the number of implants have any relation with peri-implant disease?

Authors:  Bernardo Born Passoni; Haline Renata Dalago; Guenther Schuldt Filho; João Gustavo Oliveira de Souza; César Augusto Magalhães Benfatti; Ricardo de Souza Magini; Marco Aurélio Bianchini
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.698

Review 4.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of removable and fixed implant-supported prostheses in edentulous jaws: post-loading implant loss.

Authors:  Jaana-Sophia Kern; Thomas Kern; Stefan Wolfart; Nicole Heussen
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 5.977

5.  Immediate Function of Anodically Oxidized Surface Implants (TiUnite™) for Fixed Prosthetic Rehabilitation: Retrospective Study with 10 Years of Follow-Up.

Authors:  Paulo Maló; Miguel de Araújo Nobre; Yolande Gonçalves; Armando Lopes; Ana Ferro
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Effects of Immediate and Delayed Loading on the Outcomes of All-on-4 Treatment: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Hossein Najafi; Hakimeh Siadat; Solmaz Akbari; Amirreza Rokn
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2016-11

7.  A finite element analysis to study the stress distribution on distal implants in an all-on-four situation in atrophic maxilla as affected by the tilt of the implants and varying cantilever lengths.

Authors:  Anju Kumari; Puja Malhotra; Shefali Phogat; Bhupender Yadav; Jaiveer Yadav; Sumit Singh Phukela
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2020-10-08

8.  Impact of Mechanical Complications on Success of Dental Implant Treatments: A Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Patrícia W Ferreira; Paulo J Nogueira; Miguel A de Araújo Nobre; Carlos Moura Guedes; Francisco Salvado
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2021-09-29
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.