OBJECTIVES: We examined geographic patterns of lung cancer incidence in Kentucky. Recent research has suggested that the coal-mining industry contributes to lung cancer risk in Appalachia. We focused on the southeastern portion of the state, which has some of the highest lung cancer rates in the nation. METHODS: We implemented a spatial scan statistic to identify areas with lung cancer incidence rates that were higher than expected, after adjusting for age, gender, and smoking. The Kentucky Cancer Registry supplied information on cases (1995-2007). The U.S. Census (2000) and several years of Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data (1996-2006) provided county-level population and smoking data. We compared the results with coal-mining data from the Mining Safety and Health Administration and public water utility data from the Kentucky Division of Water. RESULTS: We identified three clusters of counties with higher-than-expected rates. Cluster 1 (relative risk [RR] = 1.21, p<0.01) included 12 counties in southeastern Kentucky. Cluster 2 (RR=1.17, p<0.01) included three nearby counties in the same region. Several of the 15 counties in Cluster 3 (RR=1.04, p=0.01) were part of the Louisville, Kentucky, or Cincinnati, Ohio, metropolitan areas. All of the counties in Clusters 1 and 2 produced significant amounts of coal. CONCLUSION: Environmental exposures related to the coal-mining industry could contribute to the high incidence of lung cancer in southeastern Kentucky. Lack of evidence for this effect in western Kentucky could be due to regional differences in mining practices and access to public water utilities. Future research should collect biological specimens and environmental samples to test for the presence of trace elements and other lung carcinogens.
OBJECTIVES: We examined geographic patterns of lung cancer incidence in Kentucky. Recent research has suggested that the coal-mining industry contributes to lung cancer risk in Appalachia. We focused on the southeastern portion of the state, which has some of the highest lung cancer rates in the nation. METHODS: We implemented a spatial scan statistic to identify areas with lung cancer incidence rates that were higher than expected, after adjusting for age, gender, and smoking. The Kentucky Cancer Registry supplied information on cases (1995-2007). The U.S. Census (2000) and several years of Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data (1996-2006) provided county-level population and smoking data. We compared the results with coal-mining data from the Mining Safety and Health Administration and public water utility data from the Kentucky Division of Water. RESULTS: We identified three clusters of counties with higher-than-expected rates. Cluster 1 (relative risk [RR] = 1.21, p<0.01) included 12 counties in southeastern Kentucky. Cluster 2 (RR=1.17, p<0.01) included three nearby counties in the same region. Several of the 15 counties in Cluster 3 (RR=1.04, p=0.01) were part of the Louisville, Kentucky, or Cincinnati, Ohio, metropolitan areas. All of the counties in Clusters 1 and 2 produced significant amounts of coal. CONCLUSION:Environmental exposures related to the coal-mining industry could contribute to the high incidence of lung cancer in southeastern Kentucky. Lack of evidence for this effect in western Kentucky could be due to regional differences in mining practices and access to public water utilities. Future research should collect biological specimens and environmental samples to test for the presence of trace elements and other lung carcinogens.
Authors: M A Palmer; E S Bernhardt; W H Schlesinger; K N Eshleman; E Foufoula-Georgiou; M S Hendryx; A D Lemly; G E Likens; O L Loucks; M E Power; P S White; P R Wilcock Journal: Science Date: 2010-01-08 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: C Arden Pope; Richard T Burnett; Michael J Thun; Eugenia E Calle; Daniel Krewski; Kazuhiko Ito; George D Thurston Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-03-06 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Whitney E Zahnd; Natoshia Askelson; Robin C Vanderpool; Lindsay Stradtman; Jean Edward; Paige E Farris; Victoria Petermann; Jan M Eberth Journal: Prev Med Date: 2019-08-15 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Abee L Boyles; Robyn B Blain; Johanna R Rochester; Raghavendhran Avanasi; Susan B Goldhaber; Sofie McComb; Stephanie D Holmgren; Scott A Masten; Kristina A Thayer Journal: Environ Int Date: 2017-07-21 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Nancy Johnson; Brent J Shelton; Claudia Hopenhayn; Thomas T Tucker; Jason M Unrine; Bin Huang; W Christian; Zhuo Zhang; Xianglin Shi; Li Li Journal: J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol Date: 2011 Impact factor: 3.567
Authors: Vira Pravosud; Nathan L Vanderford; Bin Huang; Thomas C Tucker; Susanne M Arnold Journal: J Rural Health Date: 2020-11-18 Impact factor: 5.667
Authors: Ellen J Hahn; Mary Kay Rayens; Sarah Adkins; Nick Simpson; Susan Frazier; David M Mannino Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2014-04-17 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Christine F Brainson; Bin Huang; Quan Chen; Laurie E McLouth; Chunyan He; Zhonglin Hao; Susanne M Arnold; Ralph G Zinner; Timothy W Mullett; Therese J Bocklage; David K Orren; John L Villano; Eric B Durbin Journal: Clin Lung Cancer Date: 2021-03-26 Impact factor: 4.785