Literature DB >> 22042950

Breast cancer risk for noncarriers of family-specific BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations: findings from the Breast Cancer Family Registry.

Allison W Kurian1, Gail D Gong, Esther M John, David A Johnston, Anna Felberg, Dee W West, Alexander Miron, Irene L Andrulis, John L Hopper, Julia A Knight, Hilmi Ozcelik, Gillian S Dite, Carmel Apicella, Melissa C Southey, Alice S Whittemore.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Women with germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations have five- to 20-fold increased risks of developing breast and ovarian cancer. A recent study claimed that women testing negative for their family-specific BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation (noncarriers) have a five-fold increased risk of breast cancer. We estimated breast cancer risks for noncarriers by using a population-based sample of patients with breast cancer and their female first-degree relatives (FDRs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were women with breast cancer and their FDRs enrolled in the population-based component of the Breast Cancer Family Registry; patients with breast cancer were tested for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, as were FDRs of identified mutation carriers. We used segregation analysis to fit a model that accommodates familial correlation in breast cancer risk due to unobserved shared risk factors.
RESULTS: We studied 3,047 families; 160 had BRCA1 and 132 had BRCA2 mutations. There was no evidence of increased breast cancer risk for noncarriers of identified mutations compared with FDRs from families without BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations: relative risk was 0.39 (95% CI, 0.04 to 3.81). Residual breast cancer correlation within families was strong, suggesting substantial risk heterogeneity in women without BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations, with some 3.4% of them accounting for roughly one third of breast cancer cases.
CONCLUSION: These results support the practice of advising noncarriers that they do not have any increase in breast cancer risk attributable to the family-specific BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22042950      PMCID: PMC3236651          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2010.34.4440

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  28 in total

1.  High throughput DNA sequence variant detection by conformation sensitive capillary electrophoresis and automated peak comparison.

Authors:  Helen Davies; Ed Dicks; Philip Stephens; Charles Cox; Jon Teague; Chris Greenman; Graham Bignell; Sarah O'meara; Sarah Edkins; Adrian Parker; Claire Stevens; Andrew Menzies; Matt Blow; Bill Bottomley; Mark Dronsfield; P Andrew Futreal; Michael R Stratton; Richard Wooster
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  2006-01-09       Impact factor: 5.736

2.  Heteroduplex analysis by capillary array electrophoresis for rapid mutation detection in large multiexon genes.

Authors:  Eladio Velasco; Mar Infante; Mercedes Durán; Lucía Pérez-Cabornero; David J Sanz; Eva Esteban-Cardeñosa; Cristina Miner
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 13.491

3.  BRCA phenocopies or ascertainment bias?

Authors:  David Goldgar; Vickie Venne; Tom Conner; Saundra Buys
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 6.318

4.  Conformation sensitive gel electrophoresis for simple and accurate detection of mutations: comparison with denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and nucleotide sequencing.

Authors:  J Körkkö; S Annunen; T Pihlajamaa; D J Prockop; L Ala-Kokko
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-02-17       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Multi-stage sampling in genetic epidemiology.

Authors:  A S Whittemore; J Halpern
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1997 Jan 15-Feb 15       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Likelihood analysis of multi-state models for disease incidence and mortality.

Authors:  J D Kalbfleisch; J F Lawless
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1988 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Phenocopies in breast cancer 1 (BRCA1) families: implications for genetic counselling.

Authors:  Jacek Gronwald; Cezary Cybulski; Jan Lubinski; Steven A Narod
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 6.318

8.  Meta-analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 penetrance.

Authors:  Sining Chen; Giovanni Parmigiani
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-04-10       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Phenocopies in BRCA1 and BRCA2 families: evidence for modifier genes and implications for screening.

Authors:  A Smith; A Moran; M C Boyd; M Bulman; A Shenton; L Smith; R Iddenden; E R Woodward; F Lalloo; E R Maher; D G R Evans
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 6.318

10.  The Breast Cancer Family Registry: an infrastructure for cooperative multinational, interdisciplinary and translational studies of the genetic epidemiology of breast cancer.

Authors:  Esther M John; John L Hopper; Jeanne C Beck; Julia A Knight; Susan L Neuhausen; Ruby T Senie; Argyrios Ziogas; Irene L Andrulis; Hoda Anton-Culver; Norman Boyd; Saundra S Buys; Mary B Daly; Frances P O'Malley; Regina M Santella; Melissa C Southey; Vickie L Venne; Deon J Venter; Dee W West; Alice S Whittemore; Daniela Seminara
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2004-05-19       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  17 in total

1.  Association between FAS 1377G>A polymorphism and breast cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kai Li; Wusheng Li; Huawei Zou; Li Zhao
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2013-08-27

2.  Can chimerism explain breast/ovarian cancers in BRCA non-carriers from BRCA-positive families?

Authors:  Rachel Mitchell; Lela Buckingham; Melody Cobleigh; Jacob Rotmensch; Kelly Burgess; Lydia Usha
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Antimüllerian hormone levels are lower in BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Lauren Johnson; Mary D Sammel; Susan Domchek; Allison Schanne; Maureen Prewitt; Clarisa Gracia
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  No evidence of increased breast cancer risk for proven noncarriers from BRCA1 and BRCA2 families.

Authors:  Henriette Roed Nielsen; Janne Petersen; Lotte Krogh; Mef Nilbert; Anne-Bine Skytte
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  Evidence that BRCA1- or BRCA2-associated cancers are not inevitable.

Authors:  Bess Levin; Denise Lech; Bernard Friedenson
Journal:  Mol Med       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 6.354

6.  Higher cytoplasmic and nuclear poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase expression in familial than in sporadic breast cancer.

Authors:  Marie-Luise Klauke; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge; Jan Budczies; Peter Bult; Judith Prinzler; Cornelia Radke; J Han J M van Krieken; Manfred Dietel; Carsten Denkert; Berit Maria Müller
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 7.  Variants of uncertain clinical significance in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer genes: best practices in functional analysis for clinical annotation.

Authors:  Alvaro N Monteiro; Peter Bouwman; Arne N Kousholt; Diana M Eccles; Gael A Millot; Jean-Yves Masson; Marjanka K Schmidt; Shyam K Sharan; Ralph Scully; Lisa Wiesmüller; Fergus Couch; Maaike P G Vreeswijk
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 6.318

8.  Family communication of BRCA1/2 results and family uptake of BRCA1/2 testing in a diverse population of BRCA1/2 carriers.

Authors:  Julia Fehniger; Feng Lin; Mary S Beattie; Galen Joseph; Celia Kaplan
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-05-12       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  No evidence of excessive cancer screening in female noncarriers from BRCA1/2 mutation-positive families.

Authors:  S Guedaoura; S Pelletier; W D Foulkes; P Hamet; J Simard; N Wong; Z El Haffaf; J Chiquette; M Dorval
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 3.677

10.  Phenocopies in melanoma-prone families with germ-line CDKN2A mutations.

Authors:  Hildur Helgadottir; Håkan Olsson; Margaret A Tucker; Xiaohong R Yang; Veronica Höiom; Alisa M Goldstein
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 8.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.