Literature DB >> 17079251

Phenocopies in BRCA1 and BRCA2 families: evidence for modifier genes and implications for screening.

A Smith1, A Moran, M C Boyd, M Bulman, A Shenton, L Smith, R Iddenden, E R Woodward, F Lalloo, E R Maher, D G R Evans.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The identification of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in familial breast cancer kindreds allows genetic testing of at-risk relatives. Those who test negative are usually reassured and additional breast cancer surveillance is discontinued. However, we postulated that in high-risk families, such as those seen in clinical genetics centres, the risk of breast cancer might be influenced not only by the BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation but also by modifier genes. One manifestation of this would be the presence of phenocopies in BRCA1/BRCA2 kindreds.
METHODS: 277 families with pathogenic BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations were reviewed and 28 breast cancer phenocopies identified. The relative risk of breast cancer in those testing negative was assessed using incidence rates from our cancer registry based on local population.
RESULTS: Phenocopies constituted up to 24% of tests on women with breast cancer after the identification of the mutation in the proband. The standardised incidence ratio for women who tested negative for the BRCA1/BRCA2 family mutation was 5.3 for all relatives, 5.0 for all first-degree relatives (FDRs) and 3.2 (95% confidence interval 2.0 to 4.9) for FDRs in whose family all other cases of breast and ovarian cancer could be explained by the identified mutation. 13 of 107 (12.1%) FDRs with breast cancer and no unexplained family history tested negative.
CONCLUSION: In high-risk families, women who test negative for the familial BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation have an increased risk of breast cancer consistent with genetic modifiers. In light of this, such women should still be considered for continued surveillance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17079251      PMCID: PMC2597903          DOI: 10.1136/jmg.2006.043091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Genet        ISSN: 0022-2593            Impact factor:   6.318


  38 in total

1.  Haplotype and cancer risk analysis of two common mutations, BRCA1 4184del4 and BRCA2 2157delG, in high risk northwest England breast/ovarian families.

Authors:  D G R Evans; S L Neuhausen; M Bulman; K Young; D Gokhale; F Lalloo
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  Sensitivity of BRCA1/2 mutation testing in 466 breast/ovarian cancer families.

Authors:  D G R Evans; M Bulman; K Young; D Gokhale; F Lalloo
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.318

3.  Inheritance of human breast cancer: evidence for autosomal dominant transmission in high-risk families.

Authors:  B Newman; M A Austin; M Lee; M C King
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Linkage of early-onset familial breast cancer to chromosome 17q21.

Authors:  J M Hall; M K Lee; B Newman; J E Morrow; L A Anderson; B Huey; M C King
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-12-21       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Familial risks, early-onset breast cancer, and BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations.

Authors:  Gillian S Dite; Mark A Jenkins; Melissa C Southey; Jane S Hocking; Graham G Giles; Margaret R E McCredie; Deon J Venter; John L Hopper
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2003-03-19       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Familial breast cancer: scope for more susceptibility genes?

Authors:  Kari Hemminki; Charlotta Granström
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  The variant E233G of the RAD51D gene could be a low-penetrance allele in high-risk breast cancer families without BRCA1/2 mutations.

Authors:  Raquel Rodríguez-López; Ana Osorio; Gloria Ribas; Marina Pollán; Luis Sánchez-Pulido; Miguel de la Hoya; Alvaro Ruibal; Pilar Zamora; Jose Ignacio Arias; Raquel Salazar; Ana Vega; Jose Ignacio Martínez; Eva Esteban-Cardeñosa; Carmen Alonso; Rocío Letón; Miguel Urioste Azcorra; Cristina Miner; M Eugenia Armengod; Angel Carracedo; Rogelio González-Sarmiento; Trinidad Caldés; Orland Díez; Javier Benítez
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2004-07-20       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  Familial aggregation of a disease consequent upon correlation between relatives in a risk factor measured on a continuous scale.

Authors:  J L Hopper; J B Carlin
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1992-11-01       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1): genetic and clinical analysis in the Southern Chinese.

Authors:  A W K Tso; R Rong; C Y Lo; K C B Tan; S C Tiu; N M S Wat; J Y Xu; A Villablanca; C Larsson; B T Teh; K S L Lam
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.478

10.  A single-nucleotide polymorphism in the RAD51 gene modifies breast cancer risk in BRCA2 carriers, but not in BRCA1 carriers or noncarriers.

Authors:  L Kadouri; Z Kote-Jarai; A Hubert; F Durocher; D Abeliovich; B Glaser; T Hamburger; R A Eeles; T Peretz
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-05-17       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  46 in total

1.  No evidence of excess breast cancer risk among mutation-negative women from BRCA mutation-positive families.

Authors:  Larissa A Korde; Christine M Mueller; Jennifer T Loud; Jeffery P Struewing; Kathy Nichols; Mark H Greene; Phuong L Mai
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Lynch syndrome: the influence of environmental factors on extracolonic cancer risk in hMLH1 c.C1528T mutation carriers and their mutation-negative sisters.

Authors:  M M Blokhuis; G E Pietersen; P A Goldberg; U Algar; L Van der Merwe; N Mbatani; A A Vorster; R S Ramesar
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  A prospective study of breast cancer risk in relatives of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Erica Rowan; Aletta Poll; Steven A Narod
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 6.318

4.  BRCA phenocopies or ascertainment bias?

Authors:  David Goldgar; Vickie Venne; Tom Conner; Saundra Buys
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 6.318

5.  Phenocopies: actual risk or self-fulfilling prophecy?

Authors:  Francois Eisinger
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 6.318

6.  Phenocopies in families seen by cancer geneticists.

Authors:  P Sasieni
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 6.318

7.  No screening yet after a negative test for the family mutation.

Authors:  M M A Tilanus-Linthorst
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 6.318

8.  Can chimerism explain breast/ovarian cancers in BRCA non-carriers from BRCA-positive families?

Authors:  Rachel Mitchell; Lela Buckingham; Melody Cobleigh; Jacob Rotmensch; Kelly Burgess; Lydia Usha
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Eligibility for magnetic resonance imaging screening in the United Kingdom: effect of strict selection criteria and anonymous DNA testing on breast cancer incidence in the MARIBS Study.

Authors:  D Gareth R Evans; Fiona Lennard; Linda J Pointon; Susan J Ramus; Simon A Gayther; Nayanta Sodha; Gek E Kwan-Lim; Martin O Leach; Ruth Warren; Deborah Thompson; Douglas F Easton; Rosalind Eeles
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Sensitivity of BRCA1/2 testing in high-risk breast/ovarian/male breast cancer families: little contribution of comprehensive RNA/NGS panel testing.

Authors:  Helen Byers; Yvonne Wallis; Elke M van Veen; Fiona Lalloo; Kim Reay; Philip Smith; Andrew J Wallace; Naomi Bowers; William G Newman; D Gareth Evans
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 4.246

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.