BACKGROUND: Posttraumatic stress disorder acquired at work can be debilitating both for workers and their employers. The disorder can result in increased sick leave, reduced productivity, and even unemployment. Furthermore, workers are especially unlikely to return to their previous place of employment after a traumatic incident at work because of the traumatic memories and symptoms of avoidance that typically accompany the disorder. Therefore, intervening in work-related PTSD becomes especially important in order to get workers back to the workplace. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted using Medline, PsycINFO, Embase, and Web of Science. The articles were independently screened based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, followed by a quality assessment of all included articles. RESULTS: The systematic search identified seven articles for inclusion in the review. These consisted of six research articles and one systematic review. The review focused specifically on interventions using real exposure techniques for anxiety disorders in the workplace. In the research articles addressed in the current review, study populations included police officers, public transportation workers, and employees injured at work. The studies examined the effectiveness of EMDR, cognitive-behavioural techniques, and an integrative therapy approach called brief eclectic psychotherapy. Interestingly, 2 of the 6 research articles addressed add-on treatments for workplace PTSD, which were designed to treat workers with PTSD who failed to respond to traditional evidence-based psychotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Results of the current review suggest that work-related interventions show promise as effective strategies for promoting return to work in employees who acquired PTSD in the workplace. Further research is needed in this area to determine how different occupational groups with specific types of traumatic exposure might respond differently to work-tailored treatments.
BACKGROUND:Posttraumatic stress disorder acquired at work can be debilitating both for workers and their employers. The disorder can result in increased sick leave, reduced productivity, and even unemployment. Furthermore, workers are especially unlikely to return to their previous place of employment after a traumatic incident at work because of the traumatic memories and symptoms of avoidance that typically accompany the disorder. Therefore, intervening in work-related PTSD becomes especially important in order to get workers back to the workplace. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted using Medline, PsycINFO, Embase, and Web of Science. The articles were independently screened based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, followed by a quality assessment of all included articles. RESULTS: The systematic search identified seven articles for inclusion in the review. These consisted of six research articles and one systematic review. The review focused specifically on interventions using real exposure techniques for anxiety disorders in the workplace. In the research articles addressed in the current review, study populations included police officers, public transportation workers, and employees injured at work. The studies examined the effectiveness of EMDR, cognitive-behavioural techniques, and an integrative therapy approach called brief eclectic psychotherapy. Interestingly, 2 of the 6 research articles addressed add-on treatments for workplace PTSD, which were designed to treat workers with PTSD who failed to respond to traditional evidence-based psychotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Results of the current review suggest that work-related interventions show promise as effective strategies for promoting return to work in employees who acquired PTSD in the workplace. Further research is needed in this area to determine how different occupational groups with specific types of traumatic exposure might respond differently to work-tailored treatments.
Authors: Jonathan I Bisson; Anke Ehlers; Rosa Matthews; Stephen Pilling; David Richards; Stuart Turner Journal: Br J Psychiatry Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 9.319
Authors: S E Lagerveld; U Bültmann; R L Franche; F J H van Dijk; M C Vlasveld; C M van der Feltz-Cornelis; D J Bruinvels; J J J M Huijs; R W B Blonk; J J L van der Klink; K Nieuwenhuijsen Journal: J Occup Rehabil Date: 2010-09
Authors: Annika Clarner; Elmar Graessel; Johanna Scholz; Alexander Niedermeier; Wolfgang Uter; Hans Drexler Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2014-09-30 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Jessica R Dietch; Camilo J Ruggero; Keke Schuler; Daniel J Taylor; Benjamin J Luft; Roman Kotov Journal: J Occup Health Psychol Date: 2019-06-17
Authors: Roman Cieslak; Valerie Anderson; Judith Bock; Bret A Moore; Alan L Peterson; Charles C Benight Journal: J Nerv Ment Dis Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 2.254
Authors: Marianne Bang Hansen; Mona Berthelsen; Alexander Nissen; Trond Heir Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2018-12-06 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Jesmin Antony; Raman Brar; Paul A Khan; Marco Ghassemi; Vera Nincic; Jane P Sharpe; Sharon E Straus; Andrea C Tricco Journal: Syst Rev Date: 2020-05-31
Authors: Anthony Venning; Tassia K Oswald; Jeremy Stevenson; Nicci Tepper; Leva Azadi; Sharon Lawn; Paula Redpath Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2021-11-25 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Caitlin Finney; Erene Stergiopoulos; Jennifer Hensel; Sarah Bonato; Carolyn S Dewa Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2013-01-29 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Carol Cancelliere; James Donovan; Mette Jensen Stochkendahl; Melissa Biscardi; Carlo Ammendolia; Corrie Myburgh; J David Cassidy Journal: Chiropr Man Therap Date: 2016-09-08