| Literature DB >> 22039498 |
Nicole Geberzahn1, Manfred Gahr.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Birdsong is a popular model system in research areas such as vocal communication, neuroethology or neuroendocrinology of behaviour. As most research has been conducted on species with male-only song production, the hormone-dependency of male song is well established. However, female singing and its mechanisms are poorly understood. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22039498 PMCID: PMC3198478 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026485
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Solitary song of female and male blue-capped cordon-bleus.
Each subject sang an individually characteristic song consisting of a unique sequence of syllables with some rendition to rendition variation. Sexual dimorphism in the song was subtle (cf. Table 2). Shown are images of spectral derivatives of solitary song (frequency as a function of time). The left panel (a–c) gives three examples of song renditions for each of three female subjects; the right panel (d–f) gives three examples of song renditions for each of three male subjects. Black bars on the bottom of each top image indicate syllables delineated using a 23 db threshold for amplitude and a −2.1 threshold for entropy in the features batch window of SAP. For the top images of (a) and (d), syllable labels are indicated as follows, i: introductory syllable, A, B, C etc. subsequently occurring syllable types. Note the immediately repeated syllables C, O and Q in (d). In the third rendition from the top of (f) a motif consisting of three syllables that are repeated within the same song is highlighted by a black box. See supplementary material for sound files for (a) and (d).
Song features in female and male blue-capped cordon-bleus.
| Females (n = 9) | Males (n = 9) | |||||
| mean±SD | mean±SD | T | df | P | P adjusted | |
|
| ||||||
| size of song type repertoire | 1±0 | 1.56±1.01 | 27 | 0.21 | 0.41 | |
| size of syllable type repertoire | 11.89±5.3 | 24.67±7.16 | −4.30 | 16 |
|
|
| % repeated syllables | 15.2±19.96 | 17.7±12.32 | −0.39 | 16 | 0.70 | 0.83 |
| song duration (ms) | 2060.26±559.67 | 3026.7±1078.69 | −2.44 | 16 |
| 0.08 |
| number of syllables per song | 10.72±3.64 | 16.19±6.39 | −2.40 | 16 |
| 0.08 |
| tempo (s−1) | 5.14±1.46 | 5.32±1.24 | −0.36 | 16 | 0.73 | 0.83 |
| increment of pitch (Hz/ms) | 0.97±0.59 | 0.94±0.51 | 0.08 | 16 | 0.94 | 0.94 |
| correlation pitch/sequential order | 0.40±0.27 | 0.46±0.21 | −0.53 | 16 | 0.60 | 0.83 |
|
| ||||||
| syllable duration (ms) | 161.75±62.29 | 149.22±26.77 | 0.25 | 16 | 0.81 | 0.81 |
| mean pitch (Hz) | 3088.56±589.08 | 2564.78±640.34 | 2.00 | 16 | 0.06 | 0.24 |
| mean frequency modulation | 27.12±5.48 | 29.15±6.27 | −0.58 | 16 | 0.57 | 0.70 |
| mean entropy | −4.42±0.45 | −3.89±0.69 | −1.87 | 16 | 0.08 | 0.24 |
| mean pitch goodness | 153.60±34.57 | 173.08±44.41 | −1.12 | 16 | 0.28 | 0.56 |
| mean mean frequency (Hz) | 4343.13±590.67 | 4136.77±310.50 | 0.57 | 16 | 0.58 | 0.70 |
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
| syllable duration | 0.08±0.03 | 0.06±0.03 | 1.18 | 16 | 0.25 | 0.46 |
| mean pitch | 0.07±0.03 | 0.09±0.04 | 30 | 0.39 | 0.46 | |
| mean frequency modulation | 0.09±0.02 | 0.08±0.02 | 1.36 | 16 | 0.19 | 0.46 |
| mean entropy | 0.14±0.08 | 0.13±0.06 | 0.38 | 16 | 0.71 | 0.71 |
| mean pitch goodness | 0.12±0.04 | 0.07±0.02 | 5 |
|
| |
| mean mean frequency | 0.03±0.02 | 0.04±0.02 | −0.95 | 16 | 0.36 | 0.46 |
|
| ||||||
| internal linearity score | 0.61±0.26 | 0.64±0.18 | −0.24 | 16 | 0.81 | 0.81 |
| consistency score | 0.86±0.14 | 0.9±0.07 | −0.76 | 16 | 0.46 | 0.81 |
|
| ||||||
| number of songs | 71±66.43 | 151.11±112.7 | −1.84 | 16 | 0.08 | 0.08 |
| latency to sing (s) | 1005.67±706.15 | 351.22±284.69 | 2.58 | 16 |
|
|
features with single values per subject analysed by independent t-test or
*Mann-Whitney U in cases where data were not normally distributed.
features with multiple values per subject analysed by linear mixed-effects models. Significant p values are given in bold.
List and description of song features.
| Song features | Description |
|
| |
| size of song type repertoire | number of different song types in the repertoire of a subject |
| size of syllable type repertoire | number of different syllable types in the repertoire of a subject |
| % repeated syllables | number of syllables that occur two or more times in a row divided by the total number of syllables |
| song duration (ms) | song duration measured from the onset of the first syllable after the introductory syllables to the offset of the last syllable as delineated in SAP |
| number of syllables per song | number of syllables per song not taken into account introductory syllables |
| tempo (s−1) | number of syllables per seconds within a song |
| increment of pitch (Hz/ms) | difference in pitch from first to last syllable within a song divided by song duration |
| correlation pitch/sequential order | correlation coefficient between mean pitch of a syllable and its sequential order in the song, describes the change of pitch |
|
| |
| syllable duration (ms) | time elapsing from the onset to the offset of a syllable |
| mean pitch (Hz) | for harmonic sounds: fundamental frequency; otherwise: mean frequency |
| mean frequency modulation | estimate of absolute slope of frequency traces |
| mean entropy | width and uniformity of power spectrum, measure of noisiness |
| mean pitch goodness | periodicity or harmonicity of the sound |
| mean mean frequency (Hz) | estimate of the centre of derivative power |
|
| |
| min cv syllable duration | minimum coefficient of variation of duration |
| min cv mean pitch | minimum coefficient of variation of pitch |
| min cv mean frequency modulation | minimum coefficient of variation of frequency modulation |
| min cv mean entropy | minimum coefficient of variation of entropy |
| min cv mean pitch goodness | minimum coefficient of variation of pitch goodness |
| min cv mean mean frequency | minimum coefficient of variation of mean frequency |
|
| |
| internal linearity score | sequential order of syllables in the song (see text) |
| consistency score | probability of consistent syllable transitions (see text) |
|
| |
| number of songs | total number of songs in 1 h of separation (first trial) |
| latency to sing (s) | latency to sing after separation from mate (first trial) |
Figure 2Different song types of one male blue-capped cordon-bleu.
A few blue-capped cordon-bleus sang more than one song type each consisting of a unique sequence of syllables. Shown are images of spectral derivatives of solitary song (frequency as a function of time). (a) and (b) give three examples of song renditions for each of two song types sung by one and the same male.
Figure 3Song features that differed between female and male blue-capped cordon-bleus.
(a) size of syllable repertoire, (b) minimum coefficient of variation for mean pitch goodness, (c) number of syllables per song, (d) duration of song (s). For (a) and (b) single values per subject, for (c) and (d) individual means ± SD are displayed. Note that for each feature subjects are displayed in ascending order within their sex group. Filled symbols represent females, open symbols represent males. For statistics see Table 2.
Figure 4Testosterone was higher in the solitary-song-induced condition compared to the baseline condition.
Testosterone concentration (pg/ml) in the blood plasma collected after one hour of baseline treatment (i.e. being transferred into another sound-isolation chamber together with the mate) and one hour of solitary-song-induced treatment (i.e. being transferred into another sound-isolation chamber without the mate). Filled symbols represent females, open symbols represent males.
Figure 5All males and females with high testosterone levels sang rapidly after separation from their mate.
Latency to sing solitary song (s) as a function of testosterone concentration (pg/ml) in the blood plasma. Filled symbols and the solid line represent females; open symbols and the broken line represent males.