Literature DB >> 22038832

Potential scenarios for nanomaterial release and subsequent alteration in the environment.

Bernd Nowack1, James F Ranville, Stephen Diamond, Julian A Gallego-Urrea, Chris Metcalfe, Jerome Rose, Nina Horne, Albert A Koelmans, Stephen J Klaine.   

Abstract

The risks associated with exposure to engineered nanomaterials (ENM) will be determined in part by the processes that control their environmental fate and transformation. These processes act not only on ENM that might be released directly into the environment, but more importantly also on ENM in consumer products and those that have been released from the product. The environmental fate and transformation are likely to differ significantly for each of these cases. The ENM released from actual direct use or from nanomaterial-containing products are much more relevant for ecotoxicological studies and risk assessment than pristine ENM. Released ENM may have a greater or lesser environmental impact than the starting materials, depending on the transformation reactions and the material. Almost nothing is known about the environmental behavior and the effects of released and transformed ENM, although these are the materials that are actually present in the environment. Further research is needed to determine whether the release and transformation processes result in a similar or more diverse set of ENM and ultimately how this affects environmental behavior. This article addresses these questions, using four hypothetical case studies that cover a wide range of ENM, their direct use or product applications, and their likely fate in the environment. Furthermore, a more definitive classification scheme for ENM should be adopted that reflects their surface condition, which is a result of both industrial and environmental processes acting on the ENM. The authors conclude that it is not possible to assess the risks associated with the use of ENM by investigating only the pristine form of the ENM, without considering alterations and transformation processes.
Copyright © 2011 SETAC.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22038832     DOI: 10.1002/etc.726

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem        ISSN: 0730-7268            Impact factor:   3.742


  59 in total

Review 1.  Bridging the divide between human and environmental nanotoxicology.

Authors:  Anzhela Malysheva; Enzo Lombi; Nicolas H Voelcker
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 39.213

2.  Residence time effects on phase transformation of nanosilver in reduced soils.

Authors:  Allison Rick VandeVoort; Ryan Tappero; Yuji Arai
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Sparking connections: toward better linkages between research and human health policy-an example with multiwalled carbon nanotubes.

Authors:  Christina M Powers; Jeff Gift; Geniece M Lehmann
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Impacts of Organomodified Nanoclays and Their Incinerated Byproducts on Bronchial Cell Monolayer Integrity.

Authors:  Todd A Stueckle; Andrew White; Alixandra Wagner; Rakesh K Gupta; Yon Rojanasakul; Cerasela Z Dinu
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 3.739

Review 5.  Nanopharmaceuticals and nanomedicines currently on the market: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Fatemeh Farjadian; Amir Ghasemi; Omid Gohari; Amir Roointan; Mahdi Karimi; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  Nanomedicine (Lond)       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 5.307

6.  Surface Degradation and Nanoparticle Release of a Commercial Nanosilica/Polyurethane Coating Under UV Exposure.

Authors:  Deborah S Jacobs; Sin-Ru Huang; Yu-Lun Cheng; Savelas A Rabb; Justin M Gorham; Peter J Krommenhoek; Lee L Yu; Tinh Nguyen; Lipiin Sung
Journal:  J Coat Technol Res       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 2.382

7.  Silver near municipal wastewater discharges into western Lake Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Chris D Metcalfe; Tamanna Sultana; Jonathan Martin; Karla Newman; Paul Helm; Sonya Kleywegt; Li Shen; Viviane Yargeau
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 2.513

8.  Soybean susceptibility to manufactured nanomaterials with evidence for food quality and soil fertility interruption.

Authors:  John H Priester; Yuan Ge; Randall E Mielke; Allison M Horst; Shelly Cole Moritz; Katherine Espinosa; Jeff Gelb; Sharon L Walker; Roger M Nisbet; Youn-Joo An; Joshua P Schimel; Reid G Palmer; Jose A Hernandez-Viezcas; Lijuan Zhao; Jorge L Gardea-Torresdey; Patricia A Holden
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Toward a robust analytical method for separating trace levels of nano-materials in natural waters: cloud point extraction of nano-copper(II) oxide.

Authors:  Seyed Mohammad Majedi; Barry C Kelly; Hian Kee Lee
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 4.223

10.  Chemical transformations of nanosilver in biological environments.

Authors:  Jingyu Liu; Zhongying Wang; Frances D Liu; Agnes B Kane; Robert H Hurt
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 15.881

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.