D P K Ng1, A Salim, Y Liu, L Zou, F G Xu, S Huang, H Leong, C N Ong. 1. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 16 Medical Drive MD3, Singapore 117597, Republic of Singapore. ephnpkd@nus.edu.sg
Abstract
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: We carried out a urinary metabolomic study to gain insight into low estimated GFR (eGFR) in patients with non-proteinuric type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Patients were identified as being non-proteinuric using multiple urinalyses. Cases (n = 44) with low eGFR and controls (n = 46) had eGFR values <60 and ≥60 ml min(-1) 1.73 m(-2), respectively, as calculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula. Urine samples were analysed by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS) and GC/MS. False discovery rates were used to adjust for multiple hypotheses testing, and selection of metabolites that best predicted low eGFR status was achieved using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression. RESULTS: Eleven GC/MS metabolites were strongly associated with low eGFR after correction for multiple hypotheses testing (smallest adjusted p value = 2.62 × 10(-14), largest adjusted p value = 3.84 × 10(-2)). In regression analysis, octanol, oxalic acid, phosphoric acid, benzamide, creatinine, 3,5-dimethoxymandelic amide and N-acetylglutamine were selected as the best subset for prediction and allowed excellent classification of low eGFR (AUC = 0.996). In LC/MS, 19 metabolites remained significant after multiple hypotheses testing had been taken into account (smallest adjusted p value = 2.04 × 10(-4), largest adjusted p value = 4.48 × 10(-2)), and several metabolites showed stronger evidence of association relative to the uraemic toxin, indoxyl sulphate (adjusted p value = 3.03 × 10(-2)). The potential effect of confounding on the association between metabolites was excluded. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Our study has yielded substantial new insight into low eGFR and provided a collection of potential urinary biomarkers for its detection.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: We carried out a urinary metabolomic study to gain insight into low estimated GFR (eGFR) in patients with non-proteinuric type 2 diabetes. METHODS:Patients were identified as being non-proteinuric using multiple urinalyses. Cases (n = 44) with low eGFR and controls (n = 46) had eGFR values <60 and ≥60 ml min(-1) 1.73 m(-2), respectively, as calculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula. Urine samples were analysed by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS) and GC/MS. False discovery rates were used to adjust for multiple hypotheses testing, and selection of metabolites that best predicted low eGFR status was achieved using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression. RESULTS: Eleven GC/MS metabolites were strongly associated with low eGFR after correction for multiple hypotheses testing (smallest adjusted p value = 2.62 × 10(-14), largest adjusted p value = 3.84 × 10(-2)). In regression analysis, octanol, oxalic acid, phosphoric acid, benzamide, creatinine, 3,5-dimethoxymandelic amide and N-acetylglutamine were selected as the best subset for prediction and allowed excellent classification of low eGFR (AUC = 0.996). In LC/MS, 19 metabolites remained significant after multiple hypotheses testing had been taken into account (smallest adjusted p value = 2.04 × 10(-4), largest adjusted p value = 4.48 × 10(-2)), and several metabolites showed stronger evidence of association relative to the uraemic toxin, indoxyl sulphate (adjusted p value = 3.03 × 10(-2)). The potential effect of confounding on the association between metabolites was excluded. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Our study has yielded substantial new insight into low eGFR and provided a collection of potential urinary biomarkers for its detection.
Authors: Caroline K Kramer; Cristiane B Leitão; Lana C Pinto; Sandra P Silveiro; Jorge L Gross; Luís H Canani Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2007-04-27 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: L Virág; P Jagtap; E Szabó; J G Mabley; L Liaudet; A Marton; D G Hoyt; K G Murthy; A L Salzman; G J Southan; C Szabó Journal: Nat Med Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Wanxing Eugene Ho; Yong-Jiang Xu; Fengguo Xu; Chang Cheng; Hong Yong Peh; Steven R Tannenbaum; W S Fred Wong; Choon Nam Ong Journal: Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol Date: 2012-11-09 Impact factor: 6.914
Authors: Jiun-Ruey Hu; Josef Coresh; Lesley A Inker; Andrew S Levey; Zihe Zheng; Casey M Rebholz; Adrienne Tin; Lawrence J Appel; Jingsha Chen; Mark J Sarnak; Morgan E Grams Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2018-06-02 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Lauren E Harrison; Charles Giardina; Lawrence E Hightower; Caesar Anderson; George A Perdrizet Journal: Cell Stress Chaperones Date: 2018-10-30 Impact factor: 3.667
Authors: Jian-Jun Liu; Sujoy Ghosh; Jean-Paul Kovalik; Jianhong Ching; Hyung Won Choi; Subramaniam Tavintharan; Choon Nam Ong; Chee Fang Sum; Scott A Summers; E Shyong Tai; Su Chi Lim Journal: Kidney Int Rep Date: 2016-12-16
Authors: Liang Cui; Yie Hou Lee; Yadunanda Kumar; Fengguo Xu; Kun Lu; Eng Eong Ooi; Steven R Tannenbaum; Choon Nam Ong Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis Date: 2013-08-15