Literature DB >> 22038161

Using National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) data for risk adjustment to compare Clavien 4 and 5 complications in open and laparoscopic colectomy.

Shawn Webb1, Ilan Rubinfeld, Vic Velanovich, H M Horst, Craig Reickert.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic colectomy has been associated with fewer postoperative complications than open colectomy. However, it is unclear whether this is true for the most severe complications typically requiring treatment in an intensive care unit (ICU). The authors hypothesized that laparoscopic colectomy patients have fewer of the most severe complications even after adjustment for comorbidity risk.
METHODS: Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) public use files for 2005-2008, the authors identified all laparoscopic (n = 12,455) and open (n = 33,190) colectomies by current procedural terminology (CPT) code. Using the Clavien classification for postoperative complications, they identified NSQIP data points most consistent with Clavien grade 4 complications requiring ICU care (postoperative septic shock, postoperative dialysis, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, prolonged ventilatory requirements, need for reintubation) or grade 5 complication (mortality). Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software. Odds ratios were calculated to compare laparoscopic and open colectomy regarding the probability of having any Clavien class 4 or 5 complication. Logistic regression was performed to account for the effect of preoperative conditions (American Society of Anesthesiology class, wound class, gender, preoperative functional status, preoperative albumin level, azotemia, thrombocytopenia, emergency case, and age >70 years) on complications.
RESULTS: The univariate odds ratio showed a 2.27- to 5.52-fold greater likelihood that a patient would have a complication requiring ICU admission if open rather than laparoscopic surgery was performed (p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression accounting for preoperative comorbidities that might affect outcome showed persistence of an increase in complications, with an odds ratio range of 1.63 to 2.21.
CONCLUSION: Evaluation of the NSQIP database demonstrated that laparoscopic colectomy confers an independent protective effect on the frequency of ICU-level (Clavien grade 4) complications and mortality. The protective effect remained evident after correction for preoperative conditions that might have affected outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22038161     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-1944-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  19 in total

1.  Case-matched comparison of clinical and financial outcome after laparoscopic or open colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Conor P Delaney; Ravi P Kiran; Anthony J Senagore; Karen Brady; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Validity of unplanned admission to an intensive care unit as a measure of patient safety in surgical patients.

Authors:  Guy Haller; Paul S Myles; Rory Wolfe; Anthony M Weeks; Johannes Stoelwinder; John McNeil
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  Laparoscopic colectomy: a critical appraisal.

Authors:  P M Falk; R W Beart; S D Wexner; A G Thorson; D G Jagelman; I C Lavery; O B Johansen; R J Fitzgibbons
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Complications and mortality in older surgical patients in Australia and New Zealand (the REASON study): a multicentre, prospective, observational study.

Authors:  D A Story; K Leslie; P S Myles; M Fink; S J Poustie; A Forbes; S Yap; V Beavis; R Kerridge
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 6.955

5.  Laparoscopic vs open colectomy for sigmoid diverticulitis: a prospective comparative study in the elderly.

Authors:  J J Tuech; P Pessaux; C Rouge; N Regenet; R Bergamaschi; J P Arnaud
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Laparoscopic-assisted vs open colectomy for severe acute colitis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD): a retrospective study in 42 patients.

Authors:  M S Dunker; W A Bemelman; J F Slors; R A van Hogezand; J Ringers; D J Gouma
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Postoperative complications and mortality in older patients having non-cardiac surgery at three Melbourne teaching hospitals.

Authors:  Larry McNicol; David A Story; Kate Leslie; Paul S Myles; Michael Fink; Andrew C Shelton; Ornella Clavisi; Stephanie J Poustie
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2007-05-07       Impact factor: 7.738

8.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial.

Authors:  James Fleshman; Daniel J Sargent; Erin Green; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; Heidi Nelson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Clinical outcomes and resource utilization associated with laparoscopic and open colectomy using a large national database.

Authors:  Conor P Delaney; Eunice Chang; Anthony J Senagore; Michael Broder
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  14 in total

1.  Laparoscopic vs open partial colectomy in elderly patients: Insights from the American College of Surgeons - National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.

Authors:  Umashankkar Kannan; Vemuru Sunil K Reddy; Amar N Mukerji; Vellore S Parithivel; Ajay K Shah; Brian F Gilchrist; Daniel T Farkas
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Impact of operative duration on postoperative pulmonary complications in laparoscopic versus open colectomy.

Authors:  Rachel M Owen; Sebastian D Perez; Nathan Lytle; Ankit Patel; S S Davis; Edward Lin; John F Sweeney
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-04-13       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for advanced transverse colon cancer.

Authors:  Liying Zhao; Yanan Wang; Hao Liu; Hao Chen; Haijun Deng; Jiang Yu; Qi Xue; Guoxin Li
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  What have we learned in minimally invasive colorectal surgery from NSQIP and NIS large databases? A systematic review.

Authors:  Gabriela Batista Rodríguez; Andrea Balla; Santiago Corradetti; Carmen Martinez; Pilar Hernández; Jesús Bollo; Eduard M Targarona
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Predictors of Clavien 4 Complications and Mortality After Necrosectomy: Analysis of the NSQIP Database.

Authors:  Nina Kolbe; Stephanie Bakey; Lisa Louwers; Dionne Blyden; Mathilda Horst; Anthony Falvo; Joe Patton; Ilan Rubinfeld
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Assessing Risk of Critical Care Complications and Mortality in the Elective Bariatric Surgery Population Using a Modified Frailty Index.

Authors:  Nina Kolbe; Arthur M Carlin; Stephanie Bakey; Lisa Louwers; H Mathilda Horst; Ilan Rubinfeld
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  The modified frailty index to predict morbidity and mortality for retroperitoneal sarcoma resections.

Authors:  Jiwon Sarah Park; Sarah B Bateni; Richard J Bold; Amanda R Kirane; Daniel J Canter; Robert J Canter
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 2.192

8.  Validation of a frailty index in patients undergoing curative surgery for urologic malignancy and comparison with other risk stratification tools.

Authors:  Danny Lascano; Jamie S Pak; Max Kates; Julia B Finkelstein; Mark Silva; Elizabeth Hagen; Arindam RoyChoudhury; Trinity J Bivalacqua; G Joel DeCastro; Mitchell C Benson; James M McKiernan
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.498

9.  A Simple Risk Score to Predict Clavien-Dindo Grade IV and V Complications After Non-elective Cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Jonathan Burke; Rishi Rattan; Shaina Sedighim; Minjae Kim
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Changing risk of perioperative myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Kenneth D Larsen; Ilan S Rubinfeld
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2012
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.