Literature DB >> 22037491

Complications following 573 percutaneous renal radiofrequency and cryoablation procedures.

Thomas D Atwell1, Rickey E Carter, Grant D Schmit, Carrie M Carr, Stephen A Boorjian, Timothy B Curry, R Houston Thompson, A Nicholas Kurup, Adam J Weisbrod, George K Chow, Bradley C Leibovich, Matthew R Callstrom, David E Patterson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To review complications related to percutaneous renal tumor ablation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospectively collected data related to renal radiofrequency (RF) ablation and cryoablation procedures performed from May 2000 through November 2010 were reviewed. This included 573 renal ablation procedures performed in 533 patients to treat 633 tumors. A total of 254 RF ablation and 311 cryoablation procedures were performed; eight patients underwent simultaneous RF ablation and cryoablation. The mean age of patients at the time of the procedure was 70 years (range, 24-93 y), and 382 of 573 procedures (67%) were performed in male patients. Complications were recorded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification scheme. Duration of hospitalization was also documented.
RESULTS: Of the 573 procedures, 63 produced complications (11.0% overall complication rate). There were 66 reported complications, of which 38 (6.6% of total procedures) were Clavien-Dindo grade II-IV major complications; there were no deaths. Major complication rates did not differ statistically (P = .15) between cryoablation (7.7%; 24 of 311) and RF ablation (4.7%; 12 of 254). Of the complications related to cryoablation, bleeding and hematuria were most common. Bleeding during cryoablation was associated with advanced age, increased tumor size, increased number of cryoprobes, and central position (P < .05). Of those treated with RF ablation, nerve and urothelial injury were most common. Mean hospitalization duration was 1 day for RF ablation and cryoablation.
CONCLUSIONS: Complications related to percutaneous renal ablation are infrequent. Recognition of potential complications and associated risk factors can allow optimization of periprocedural care.
Copyright © 2012 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22037491     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2011.09.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  43 in total

1.  Safety, efficacy and predictors of local recurrence after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of biopsy-proven renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Michael Z Su; Fatima Memon; Howard M Lau; Andrew J Brooks; Manish I Patel; Henry H Woo; Simon V Bariol; Philip Vladica
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Incidence of hypercoagulable events after image-guided percutaneous cryoablation of renal tumors: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Jason B Hartman; Nicholas Bhojwani; David J Corn; Matthew M Cooney; John Haaga; Lee Ponsky; Robert Abouassaly; Akshay Paspulati; J David Prologo
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 3.464

3.  Canadian Urological Association guideline for followup of patients after treatment of non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Wassim Kassouf; Leonardo L Monteiro; Darrel E Drachenberg; Adrian S Fairey; Antonio Finelli; Anil Kapoor; Jean-Baptiste Lattouf; Michael J Leveridge; Nicholas E Power; Frederic Pouliot; Ricardo A Rendon; Robert Sabbagh; Alan I So; Simon Tanguay; Rodney H Breau
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Effect of Tumor Complexity and Technique on Efficacy and Complications after Percutaneous Microwave Ablation of Stage T1a Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Single-Center, Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Marki E Klapperich; E Jason Abel; Timothy J Ziemlewicz; Sara Best; Meghan G Lubner; Stephen Y Nakada; J Louis Hinshaw; Christopher L Brace; Fred T Lee; Shane A Wells
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  High-powered microwave ablation of t1a renal cell carcinoma: safety and initial clinical evaluation.

Authors:  Anna J Moreland; Timothy J Ziemlewicz; Sara L Best; J Louis Hinshaw; Meghan G Lubner; Marci L Alexander; Christopher L Brace; Douglas R Kitchin; Sean P Hedican; Stephen Y Nakada; Fred T Lee; E Jason Abel
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 6.  Renal ablation update.

Authors:  Vishal Khiatani; Robert G Dixon
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 7.  Complications of image-guided thermal ablation of liver and kidney neoplasms.

Authors:  Kyung Rae Kim; Sarah Thomas
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 8.  Percutaneous ablation for small renal masses-complications.

Authors:  A Nicholas Kurup
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 9.  [Ablative therapy of small renal masses].

Authors:  M C Kriegmair; N Wagener; S J Diehl; N Rathmann
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 0.639

10.  Arterial Clamping Increases Central Renal Cryoablation Efficacy: An Animal Study.

Authors:  Lasse L Nonboe; Tommy K Nielsen; Søren Høyer; Ole Graumann; Jørgen Frøkiær; Michael Borre
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-08-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.