BACKGROUND: Brain tissue partial oxygen pressure (Pbt(O(2))) and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) are novel methods to evaluate cerebral oxygenation. We studied the response patterns of Pbt(O(2)), NIRS, and cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV) to changes in arterial pressure (AP) and intracranial pressure (ICP). METHODS: Digital recordings of multimodal brain monitoring from 42 head-injured patients were retrospectively analysed. Response latencies and patterns of Pbt(O(2)), NIRS-derived parameters [tissue oxygenation index (TOI) and total haemoglobin index (THI)], and CBFV reactions to fluctuations of AP and ICP were studied. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-one events were identified. In reaction to alterations of AP, ICP reacted first [4.3 s; inter-quartile range (IQR) -4.9 to 22.0 s, followed by NIRS-derived parameters and CBFV (10.9 s; IQR: -5.9 to 39.6 s, 12.1 s; IQR: -3.0 to 49.1 s, 14.7 s; IQR: -8.8 to 52.3 s for THI, CBFV, and TOI, respectively), with Pbt(O(2)) reacting last (39.6 s; IQR: 16.4 to 66.0 s). The differences in reaction time between NIRS parameters and Pbt(O(2)) were significant (P<0.001). Similarly when reactions to ICP changes were analysed, NIRS parameters preceded Pbt(O(2)) (7.1 s; IQR: -8.8 to 195.0 s, 18.1 s; IQR: -20.6 to 80.7 s, 22.9 s; IQR: 11.0 to 53.0 s for THI, TOI, and Pbt(O(2)), respectively). Two main patterns of responses to AP changes were identified. With preserved cerebrovascular reactivity, TOI and Pbt(O(2)) followed the direction of AP. With impaired cerebrovascular reactivity, TOI and Pbt(O(2)) decreased while AP and ICP increased. In 77% of events, the direction of TOI changes was concordant with Pbt(O(2)). CONCLUSIONS: NIRS and transcranial Doppler signals reacted first to AP and ICP changes. The reaction of Pbt(O(2)) is delayed. The results imply that the analysed modalities monitor different stages of cerebral oxygenation.
BACKGROUND: Brain tissue partial oxygen pressure (Pbt(O(2))) and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) are novel methods to evaluate cerebral oxygenation. We studied the response patterns of Pbt(O(2)), NIRS, and cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV) to changes in arterial pressure (AP) and intracranial pressure (ICP). METHODS: Digital recordings of multimodal brain monitoring from 42 head-injured patients were retrospectively analysed. Response latencies and patterns of Pbt(O(2)), NIRS-derived parameters [tissue oxygenation index (TOI) and total haemoglobin index (THI)], and CBFV reactions to fluctuations of AP and ICP were studied. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-one events were identified. In reaction to alterations of AP, ICP reacted first [4.3 s; inter-quartile range (IQR) -4.9 to 22.0 s, followed by NIRS-derived parameters and CBFV (10.9 s; IQR: -5.9 to 39.6 s, 12.1 s; IQR: -3.0 to 49.1 s, 14.7 s; IQR: -8.8 to 52.3 s for THI, CBFV, and TOI, respectively), with Pbt(O(2)) reacting last (39.6 s; IQR: 16.4 to 66.0 s). The differences in reaction time between NIRS parameters and Pbt(O(2)) were significant (P<0.001). Similarly when reactions to ICP changes were analysed, NIRS parameters preceded Pbt(O(2)) (7.1 s; IQR: -8.8 to 195.0 s, 18.1 s; IQR: -20.6 to 80.7 s, 22.9 s; IQR: 11.0 to 53.0 s for THI, TOI, and Pbt(O(2)), respectively). Two main patterns of responses to AP changes were identified. With preserved cerebrovascular reactivity, TOI and Pbt(O(2)) followed the direction of AP. With impaired cerebrovascular reactivity, TOI and Pbt(O(2)) decreased while AP and ICP increased. In 77% of events, the direction of TOI changes was concordant with Pbt(O(2)). CONCLUSIONS: NIRS and transcranial Doppler signals reacted first to AP and ICP changes. The reaction of Pbt(O(2)) is delayed. The results imply that the analysed modalities monitor different stages of cerebral oxygenation.
Authors: Jennifer K Lee; Kathleen K Kibler; Paul B Benni; R Blaine Easley; Marek Czosnyka; Peter Smielewski; Raymond C Koehler; Donald H Shaffner; Ken M Brady Journal: Stroke Date: 2009-03-12 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Mary C McCarthy; Hugh Moncrief; Jean M Sands; Ronald J Markert; Lawrence C Hall; Ian C Wenker; Harry L Anderson; A Peter Ekeh; Mbaga S Walusimbi; Randy J Woods; Jonathan M Saxe; Kathryn M Tchorz Journal: Surgery Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Luzius A Steiner; David Pfister; Stephan P Strebel; Danila Radolovich; Peter Smielewski; Marek Czosnyka Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2008-09-20 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: B Schmidt; M Czosnyka; J J Schwarze; D Sander; W Gerstner; C B Lumenta; J D Pickard; J Klingelhöfer Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 1999-09 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Alexander Ruesch; Samantha Schmitt; Jason Yang; Matthew A Smith; Jana M Kainerstorfer Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2019-11-27 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: R Blaine Easley; Kathleen K Kibler; Kenneth M Brady; Brijen Joshi; Masahiro Ono; Charles Brown; Charles W Hogue Journal: Neurol Res Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 2.448
Authors: Karol P Budohoski; Marek Czosnyka; Peter J Kirkpatrick; Peter Smielewski; Luzius A Steiner; John D Pickard Journal: Nat Rev Neurol Date: 2013-02-19 Impact factor: 42.937
Authors: Frederick A Zeiler; Erta Beqiri; Manuel Cabeleira; Peter J Hutchinson; Nino Stocchetti; David K Menon; Marek Czosnyka; Peter Smielewski; Ari Ercole Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2020-05-04 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: David J Davies; Zhangjie Su; Michael T Clancy; Samuel J E Lucas; Hamid Dehghani; Ann Logan; Antonio Belli Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2015-04-17 Impact factor: 5.269