Literature DB >> 22037121

Lack of clinically detectable acute changes on autonomic or thermoregulatory functions in healthy subjects after transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).

Ronney Jorge S Raimundo1, Carlos E Uribe2, Joaquim P Brasil-Neto3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neuromodulatory techniques, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), have been increasingly studied as possible treatments for many neurological and psychiatric disorders. tDCS is capable of inducing changes in regional cerebral blood flow in both cortical and subcortical structures, as shown by positron emission tomography studies, and might conceivably affect hypothalamic and autonomic nervous system functions. However, it remains unknown whether acute changes in autonomic or hypothalamic functions may be triggered by conventional tDCS protocols. OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: To verify whether tDCS, when performed with a bipolar cephalic montage, is capable of inducing acute changes in autonomic or hypothalamic functions in healthy subjects.
METHODS: Fifty healthy volunteers were studied. tDCS was performed with the anode over the C3 position and the cathode over the right supraorbital region. Subjects received either real or sham tDCS. Parameters assessed before and after a 20-minute session included blood pressure, tympanic thermometry, hand skin temperature, heart rate and ventilatory rate. Plasma concentrations of cortisol were also measured in a sub-set of 10 participants.
RESULTS: A repeated-measures, mixed-design ANOVA showed significant changes in hand skin temperature (P = .005) and cortisol levels (P < .001) after both real and sham stimulation. There were no statistically significant changes in any of the other measurements.
CONCLUSIONS: The changes in hand temperature and cortisol levels, having occurred in both the sham and experimental groups, probably reflect a non-specific stress response to a new procedure. There were no significant changes in autonomic functions, ventilation rate or core body temperature that can be attributed to conventional tDCS applied to healthy volunteers.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22037121     DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2011.03.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Stimul        ISSN: 1876-4754            Impact factor:   8.955


  15 in total

1.  Transcranial electrical stimulation modifies the neuronal response to psychosocial stress exposure.

Authors:  Andrea Antal; Thomas Fischer; Catarina Saiote; Robert Miller; Leila Chaieb; Danny J J Wang; Franziska Plessow; Walter Paulus; Clemens Kirschbaum
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Transcranial direct-current stimulation modulates offline visual oscillatory activity: A magnetoencephalography study.

Authors:  Elizabeth Heinrichs-Graham; Timothy J McDermott; Mackenzie S Mills; Nathan M Coolidge; Tony W Wilson
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 4.027

Review 3.  Mitigation of stress: new treatment alternatives.

Authors:  Ahmad Rauf Subhani; Nidal Kamel; Mohamad Naufal Mohamad Saad; Nanda Nandagopal; Kenneth Kang; Aamir Saeed Malik
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 5.082

4.  Anodal tDCS of the lower limb M1 does not acutely affect clinical blood pressure and heart rate in healthy and post stroke individuals.

Authors:  Tai Tri Nguyen; John Ugwu; Sangeetha Madhavan
Journal:  SOJ Neurol       Date:  2015-12-01

Review 5.  Using transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) to understand cognitive processing.

Authors:  Robert M G Reinhart; Josh D Cosman; Keisuke Fukuda; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Tolerability of Repeated Application of Transcranial Electrical Stimulation with Limited Outputs to Healthy Subjects.

Authors:  Bhaskar Paneri; Devin Adair; Chris Thomas; Niranjan Khadka; Vaishali Patel; William J Tyler; Lucas Parra; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 7.  Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Evidence Based Update 2016.

Authors:  Marom Bikson; Pnina Grossman; Chris Thomas; Adantchede Louis Zannou; Jimmy Jiang; Tatheer Adnan; Antonios P Mourdoukoutas; Greg Kronberg; Dennis Truong; Paulo Boggio; André R Brunoni; Leigh Charvet; Felipe Fregni; Brita Fritsch; Bernadette Gillick; Roy H Hamilton; Benjamin M Hampstead; Ryan Jankord; Adam Kirton; Helena Knotkova; David Liebetanz; Anli Liu; Colleen Loo; Michael A Nitsche; Janine Reis; Jessica D Richardson; Alexander Rotenberg; Peter E Turkeltaub; Adam J Woods
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 8.955

8.  Minimal Heating at the Skin Surface During Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.

Authors:  Niranjan Khadka; Adantchede L Zannou; Fatima Zunara; Dennis Q Truong; Jacek Dmochowski; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2017-01-22

9.  A systematic review of non-invasive brain stimulation therapies and cardiovascular risk: implications for the treatment of major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Leonardo Augusto Negreiros Parente Capela Sampaio; Renerio Fraguas; Paulo Andrade Lotufo; Isabela Martins Benseñor; André Russowsky Brunoni
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 4.157

10.  Cardiovascular Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Bimanual Training in Children With Cerebral Palsy.

Authors:  Manda L Keller-Ross; Daniel P Chantigian; Samuel Nemanich; Bernadette T Gillick
Journal:  Pediatr Phys Ther       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 1.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.