Literature DB >> 22036543

Humeral component retroversion in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a biomechanical study.

Lawrence V Gulotta1, Dan Choi, Patrick Marinello, Zakary Knutson, Joseph Lipman, Timothy Wright, Frank A Cordasco, Edward V Craig, Russell F Warren.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty offers pain relief and functional improvement for patients with rotator cuff-deficient shoulders. The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal amount of humeral retroversion for this prosthesis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six cadaveric shoulders underwent computed tomography (CT) imaging and were then dissected of soft tissues, except for their tendinous attachments. A reverse total shoulder arthroplasty was implanted in 0°, 20°, 30°, and 40° of retroversion, and the shoulders were mounted on a simulator to determine the muscle forces required to achieve 30° and 60° of scaption. CT images were converted into 3-dimensional models, and the amount of internal and external rotation was determined with computer modeling at various scaption angles.
RESULTS: No differences were found in the forces required for 30° or 60° of scaption for any muscle, at any retroversion. With increasing retroversion, more impingement-free external rotation was obtained, with a concomitant decrease in the amount of internal rotation. Above 60°, the humerus was allowed to rotate around the glenosphere unencumbered.
CONCLUSIONS: Increasing retroversion did not affect the muscle force requirements for scaption across the shoulder. Placing the humeral component in 0° to 20° of retroversion allows maximum internal rotation with the arm at the side, a movement that is required for daily activities. This limits external rotation with the arm at the side, but has no effect on external rotation with the arm elevated.
Copyright © 2012 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22036543     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.07.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  21 in total

1.  Effect of humeral stem design on humeral position and range of motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alexandre Lädermann; Patrick J Denard; Pascal Boileau; Alain Farron; Pierric Deransart; Alexandre Terrier; Julien Ston; Gilles Walch
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Optimal glenoid component inclination in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. How to improve implant stability.

Authors:  P Randelli; F Randelli; P Arrigoni; V Ragone; R D'Ambrosi; P Masuzzo; P Cabitza; G Banfi
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2014-03-23

3.  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: research models.

Authors:  Stefano Petrillo; Umile Giuseppe Longo; Lawrence V Gulotta; Alessandra Berton; Andreas Kontaxis; Timothy Wright; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2017-02-07

Review 4.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears and cuff tear arthropathy: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Petrillo; U G Longo; R Papalia; V Denaro
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-04-25

5.  Development and Application of a Novel Metric to Characterize Comprehensive Range of Motion of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Josie A Elwell; George S Athwal; Ryan Willing
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  [Cuff tear arthropathy – long-term results of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty].

Authors:  U Brunner; K Rückl; M Fruth
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  Pre-operative factors influence the recovery of range of motion following reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Philippe Collin; Tetsuya Matsukawa; Patrick J Denard; Solenn Gain; Alexandre Lädermann
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Is there any influence of humeral component retroversion on range of motion and clinical outcome in reverse shoulder arthroplasty? A clinical study.

Authors:  F A de Boer; P M van Kampen; P E Huijsmans
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2016-12-03

9.  Tomographic Analysis of Positioning of Reverse Baseplates Positioning.

Authors:  Alexandre Almeida; Daniel C Agostini; Pietro Ft Nesello; Nayvaldo C de Almeida; Rafael Mioso; Ana Paula Agostini
Journal:  J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast       Date:  2021-02-15

10.  Factors influencing functional internal rotation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Bettina Hochreiter; Anita Hasler; Julian Hasler; Philipp Kriechling; Paul Borbas; Christian Gerber
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-04-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.