Literature DB >> 22036512

Puerperal and menstrual bleeding patterns with different types of contraceptive device fitted during elective cesarean delivery.

Mervat S E Elsedeek1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of a copper-containing intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD) and the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (IUS) on puerperal and menstrual bleeding when fitted intraoperatively during scheduled elective cesarean.
METHODS: Participants were allocated to 3 groups: cesarean with no device inserted; IUCD inserted during cesarean; and IUS inserted during cesarean.
RESULTS: There was significantly shorter and lighter puerperium in the IUS group (20.2 ± 7.7 days and 3.1 ± 1.6 pads/day) than in the IUCD (33.4 ± 9.5 days and 4.9 ± 2.4 pads/day) and the control (27.0 ± 11.4 days and 4.9 ± 2.3 pads/day) groups (P<0.012 and P<0.0001, respectively). At the end of puerperium, mean duration of amenorrhea was significantly longer in the IUS group than in the IUCD and control groups (P<0.0001). Menstrual periods were longer and heavier in the IUCD group than in the control group but the difference was not significant (P>0.07). In the IUS group, menstrual periods were significantly shorter and lighter than in the other groups (P<0.0001).
CONCLUSION: Intrauterine system fitting at the time of elective cesarean is associated with significant reductions in the duration and amount of puerperal blood loss, as well as a high incidence of amenorrhea and lighter periods thereafter.
Copyright © 2011 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22036512     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.07.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  4 in total

1.  Expulsion of intrauterine devices after postpartum placement by timing of placement, delivery type, and intrauterine device type: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sarah H Averbach; Yokabed Ermias; Gary Jeng; Kathryn M Curtis; Maura K Whiteman; Erin Berry-Bibee; Denise J Jamieson; Polly A Marchbanks; Naomi K Tepper; Tara C Jatlaoui
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Intrauterine Device Expulsion After Postpartum Placement: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tara C Jatlaoui; Maura K Whiteman; Gary Jeng; Naomi K Tepper; Erin Berry-Bibee; Denise J Jamieson; Polly A Marchbanks; Kathryn M Curtis
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  A randomised clinical trial to assess satisfaction with the levonorgestrel- releasing intrauterine system inserted at caesarean section compared to postpartum placement.

Authors:  Kathleen Braniff; Edmund Gomez; Reinhold Muller
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 2.100

Review 4.  Insertion of intrauterine devices after cesarean section: a systematic review update.

Authors:  Norman D Goldstuck; Petrus S Steyn
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2017-04-18
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.