Literature DB >> 22035781

Optimizing pressurized contact area in rotator cuff repair: the diamondback repair.

Stephen S Burkhart1, Patrick J Denard, Elifho Obopilwe, Augustus D Mazzocca.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare tendon-bone footprint contact area over time under physiologic loads for 4 different rotator cuff repair techniques: single row (SR), triangle double row (DR), chain-link double row (CL), and diamondback double row (DBK).
METHODS: A supraspinatus tear was created in 28 human cadavers. Tears were fixed with 1 of 4 constructs: SR, DR, CL, or DBK. Immediate post-repair measurements of pressurized contact area were taken in neutral rotation and 0° of abduction. After a static tensile load, pressurized contact area was observed over a 160-minute period after repair. Cyclic loading was then performed.
RESULTS: The DBK repair had the highest pressurized contact area initially, as well as the highest pressurized contact area and lowest percentage decrease in pressurized contact area after 160 minutes of testing. The DBK repair had significantly larger initial pressurized contact than CL (P = .003) and SR (P = .004) but not DR (P = .06). The DBK technique was the only technique that produced a pressurized contact area that exceeded the native footprint both at initial repair (P = .01) and after 160 minutes of testing (P = .01). DBK had a significantly larger mean pressurized contact area than all the repairs after 160 minutes of testing (P = .01). DBK had a significantly larger post-cyclic loading pressurized contact area than CL (P = .01) and SR (P = .004) but not DR (P = .07).
CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that a diamondback repair (a modification of the transosseous repair) can significantly increase the rotator cuff pressurized contact area in comparison with other standard rotator cuff repair constructs when there is sufficient tendon mobility to perform a double-row repair without excessive tension on the repair site. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The persistent pressurized contact area of a DBK repair may be desirable to enhance healing potential when there is sufficient tendon mobility to perform a double-row repair, particularly for large or massive rotator cuff tears where it is important to optimize footprint area and contact to encourage biologic healing.
Copyright © 2012 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22035781     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.07.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  5 in total

1.  Mechanical consequences at the tendon-bone interface of different medial row knotless configurations and lateral row tension in a simulated rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Carlos Maia Dias; Sérgio B Gonçalves; António Completo; Manuel Ribeiro da Silva; Clara de Campos Azevedo; Jorge Mineiro; Frederico Ferreira; João Folgado
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2022-09-19

2.  Double row equivalent for rotator cuff repair: A biomechanical analysis of a new technique.

Authors:  Sean Robinson; Henry Krigbaum; Jon Kramer; Connor Purviance; Robin Parrish; Joseph Donahue
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-03-21

3.  Linked Double-Row Equivalent Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Leads to Significantly Improved Patient Outcomes.

Authors:  Atsushi Endo; Paul Hoogervorst; Conrad Safranek; Kyle R Sochacki; Marc R Safran; Seth L Sherman; Joseph Donahue
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-07-16

4.  Biomechanics of an interlinked suture anchor rotator cuff repair in a human cadaveric model.

Authors:  Klevis Aliaj; Heath B Henninger; Jean-Olivier E Tétreault-Paquin; Mark H Getelman; Joseph P Donahue
Journal:  JSES Open Access       Date:  2019-04-26

5.  Why are tapes better than wires in knotless rotator cuff repairs? An evaluation of force, pressure and contact area in a tendon bone unit mechanical model.

Authors:  Carlos Maia Dias; Sérgio B Gonçalves; António Completo; Martina Tognini; Manuel Ribeiro da Silva; Jorge Mineiro; Francisco Curate; Frederico Ferreira; João Folgado
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2021-02-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.