Literature DB >> 22035634

Imaging for target volume delineation in rectal cancer radiotherapy--a systematic review.

S Gwynne1, S Mukherjee, R Webster, E Spezi, J Staffurth, B Coles, R Adams.   

Abstract

The global move towards more conformal radiotherapy for rectal cancer requires better imaging modalities that both visualise the disease accurately and are reproducible; to reduce interobserver variation. This review explores the advances in imaging modalities used in target volume delineation, with a view to make recommendations for current clinical practice and to propose future directions for research. A systematic review was conducted using MEDLINE and EMBASE. Articles considered relevant by the authors were included. Planning with orthogonal films is being replaced by computed tomography (CT) simulation. This is now considered the 'gold standard' and allows conformal three-dimensional planning. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been shown to overcome some of the limitations of CT and can be used either as a diagnostic image to visually aid planning, or as a 'planning' MRI carried out in the treatment position and co-registered with the planning CT. The latter approach has been shown to change the treated volumes compared with CT and in prostate cancer patients has been shown to reduce interobserver variation. There are remaining issues with four-dimensional motion that are yet to be fully appreciated or overcome. 2-[18F] fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography/CT co-registered with planning CT results in smaller volumes than CT alone and also reduces interobserver variation, but requires further validation before routine implementation. Experimental work utilising novel positron emission tomography tracers and diffusion-weighted MRI shows promise and requires further evaluation. Rigorous quality assurance is important with processing of newer imaging modalities. Further work needs to be conducted into both interobserver variation and the formal evaluation of the clinical benefits of newer imaging modalities. Developments in image-guided radiotherapy are also required to ensure that improvements in target definition at the planning stage are reproducible throughout treatment.
Copyright © 2011 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22035634     DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2011.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)        ISSN: 0936-6555            Impact factor:   4.126


  7 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer: a surgeon's perspective.

Authors:  Avanish P Saklani; Sung Uk Bae; Amy Clayton; Nam Kyu Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Correlation of rectal tumor volumes with oncological outcomes for low rectal cancers: does tumor size matter?

Authors:  Muhammad Tayyab; Abdul Razack; Abhiram Sharma; James Gunn; John E Hartley
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 3.  Clinical application of multimodality imaging in radiotherapy treatment planning for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Yan Yang Wang; Hong Zhe
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 3.909

4.  Assessment of dosimetric and positioning accuracy of a magnetic resonance imaging-only solution for external beam radiotherapy of pelvic anatomy.

Authors:  Reko Kemppainen; Sami Suilamo; Iiro Ranta; Marko Pesola; Aleksi Halkola; Alvin Eufemio; Heikki Minn; Jani Keyriläinen
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-06-22

5.  Clinical workflow for treating patients with a metallic hip prosthesis using magnetic resonance imaging-guided radiotherapy.

Authors:  Rick Keesman; Erik van der Bijl; Tomas M Janssen; Tineke Vijlbrief; Floris J Pos; Uulke A van der Heide
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-08-12

6.  Three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance volume assessment and loco-regional failure in anal cancer: early evaluation case-control study.

Authors:  Hema Sekhar; Rohit Kochhar; Bernadette Carrington; Thomas Kaye; Damian Tolan; Mark P Saunders; Matthew Sperrin; David Sebag-Montefiore; Marcel van Herk; Andrew G Renehan
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  A randomized study of the effect of patient positioning on setup reproducibility and dose distribution to organs at risk in radiotherapy of rectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Trude C Frøseth; Trond Strickert; Kjersti S Solli; Øyvind Salvesen; Gunilla Frykholm; Randi J Reidunsdatter
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 3.481

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.