Literature DB >> 22035340

Elevated C-reactive protein in the diagnosis, prognosis, and cause of cancer.

Kristine H Allin1, Børge G Nordestgaard.   

Abstract

The aim of this review is to summarize present evidence of an association between circulating levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) and cancer risk, and to evaluate whether elevated circulating CRP levels cause cancer. Additionally, the review provides background information on the acute-phase response, chronic inflammation, the molecular biology, function and measurement of CRP, circulating levels of CRP in health and disease, the principle of Mendelian randomization, the association between circulating levels of CRP and cancer prognosis, and cancer biomarkers. In the Copenhagen General Population Study of approximately 63,500 individuals, the distribution of circulating levels of CRP was markedly skewed to the right with 97% of the participants having CRP levels<10 mg/L. The median plasma CRP concentration was 1.53 mg/L (IQR, 1.14-2.51) and 34% of the participants had circulating CRP levels of ≥2 mg/L. Epidemiologic studies suggest that in patients with several types of solid cancers, elevated circulating levels of CRP are associated with poor prognosis, whereas in apparently healthy individuals from the general population, elevated levels of CRP are associated with increased future risk of cancer of any type, lung cancer, and possibly colorectal cancer, but not breast or prostate cancer. The robust association between circulating levels of CRP and cancer risk may be due to (1) causality: elevated CRP levels cause cancer, (2) reverse causality: occult cancer increases CRP levels, (3) or confounding: a third factor, e.g. inflammation, increases both CRP levels and the risk of cancer. Genetic epidemiologic studies (Mendelian randomization studies), which have examined the association between genetic polymorphisms influencing circulating levels of CRP and cancer risk suggest that circulating levels of CRP do not cause cancer. A lack of causality between elevated CRP levels and increased cancer risk does, however, not invalidate the potential clinical use of slightly increased CRP levels to predict risk of certain cancer types, and to improve staging and treatment allocation in patients diagnosed with cancer. Indeed, in a study of the general population, individuals with CRP levels in the highest versus the lowest quintile had a 1.3-fold increased risk of cancer of any type and a 2-fold increased risk of lung cancer. Among individuals diagnosed with cancer during the study period, individuals with a high baseline CRP (>3 mg/L) had an 80% greater risk of early death compared with those with low CRP levels (<1 mg/L). Accordingly, patients with invasive breast cancer and CRP levels>3 mg/L at diagnosis had a 1.7-fold increased risk of death from breast cancer compared to patients with CRP levels<1 mg/L at diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22035340     DOI: 10.3109/10408363.2011.599831

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci        ISSN: 1040-8363            Impact factor:   6.250


  178 in total

Review 1.  Adoptive T-cell therapy using autologous tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes for metastatic melanoma: current status and future outlook.

Authors:  Richard Wu; Marie-Andrée Forget; Jessica Chacon; Chantale Bernatchez; Cara Haymaker; Jie Qing Chen; Patrick Hwu; Laszlo G Radvanyi
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.360

Review 2.  Biomarkers for chronic fatigue.

Authors:  Nancy G Klimas; Gordon Broderick; Mary Ann Fletcher
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 7.217

Review 3.  Nanoparticle Probes for the Detection of Cancer Biomarkers, Cells, and Tissues by Fluorescence.

Authors:  Alyssa B Chinen; Chenxia M Guan; Jennifer R Ferrer; Stacey N Barnaby; Timothy J Merkel; Chad A Mirkin
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 60.622

4.  Retrospective analysis of cancer patients admitted to a tertiary centre with suspected neutropenic sepsis: Are C-reactive protein and neutrophil count useful prognostic biomarkers?

Authors:  Thomas Wilson; Tim Cooksley; Steven Churchill; John Radford; Paul Dark
Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc       Date:  2017-12-04

5.  Factors Associated with Multiple Biomarkers of Systemic Inflammation.

Authors:  Sandi L Navarro; Elizabeth D Kantor; Xiaoling Song; Ginger L Milne; Johanna W Lampe; Mario Kratz; Emily White
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Prognostic value of inflammation-based markers in advanced or metastatic neuroendocrine tumours.

Authors:  J Zou; Q Li; F Kou; Y Zhu; M Lu; J Li; Z Lu; L Shen
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 3.677

7.  Current status of the prognostic molecular biomarkers in breast cancer: A systematic review.

Authors:  Goro Kutomi; Toru Mizuguchi; Fukino Satomi; Hideki Maeda; Hiroaki Shima; Yasutoshi Kimura; Koichi Hirata
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 2.967

8.  Multiplex Immunosensor Arrays for Electrochemical Detection of Cancer Biomarker Proteins.

Authors:  Bernard S Munge; Thomas Stracensky; Kathleen Gamez; Dimitri DiBiase; James F Rusling
Journal:  Electroanalysis       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 3.223

Review 9.  C-reactive protein and long-term ischemic stroke prognosis.

Authors:  Reyna L VanGilder; Danielle M Davidov; Kyle R Stinehart; Jason D Huber; Ryan C Turner; Karen S Wilson; Eric Haney; Stephen M Davis; Paul D Chantler; Laurie Theeke; Charles L Rosen; Todd J Crocco; Laurie Gutmann; Taura L Barr
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 1.961

10.  Elevated Values of C-Reactive Protein Induced by Imported Infectious Diseases: A Controlled Cross-Sectional Study of 11,079 Diseased German Travelers Returning from the Tropics and Subtropics.

Authors:  Karl-Heinz Herbinger; Ingrid Hanus; Mirjam Schunk; Marcus Beissner; Frank von Sonnenburg; Thomas Löscher; Gisela Bretzel; Michael Hoelscher; Hans Dieter Nothdurft; Kristina Lydia Huber
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 2.345

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.