Literature DB >> 22034114

Patient preoperative expectations of total hip replacement in European orthopedic centers.

Nicola Hobbs1, Diane Dixon, Susan Rasmussen, Andy Judge, Karsten E Dreinhöfer, Klaus-Peter Günther, Paul Dieppe.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Patient expectations have been identified as a factor that may account for individual differences in recovery after total hip replacement (THR) surgery. However, patient expectations have not been studied within a valid theoretical framework. This study employed the World Health Organization's model of health, the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), to classify the content of preoperative patient expectations of THR.
METHODS: A European cohort of 1,108 patients preoperatively reported 2 types of expectations. Patients reported what they anticipated surgery would enable them to do that they needed to be able to do ("need" expectation), and what they would like to be able to do ("desire" expectation) in a year's time. Free-text responses were independently classified by 2 researchers to 1 or more of the ICF constructs of impairment, activity limitation, and participation restriction.
RESULTS: Interrater reliability was high (κ = ≥0.87). All patient expectations were classified to the ICF constructs. Less than 5% of patient expectations were identified as impairment, 58% of "need" expectations were identified as activity limitations, and 45% of "desire" expectations were identified as activity limitations and participation restrictions combined.
CONCLUSION: The ICF is a suitable theoretical framework to study patient expectations of THR. THR targets impairment; however, few patient expectations were classified to the ICF definition of impairment. The majority of patient expectations were classified as activity limitation or a combination of activity limitation and participation restriction. Therefore, patient expectations of surgery focus on recovering valued activities rather than reversal of bodily impairments.
Copyright © 2011 by the American College of Rheumatology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22034114     DOI: 10.1002/acr.20596

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)        ISSN: 2151-464X            Impact factor:   4.794


  9 in total

1.  Discordance in TKA expectations between patients and surgeons.

Authors:  Hassan M K Ghomrawi; Carol A Mancuso; Geoffrey H Westrich; Robert G Marx; Alvin I Mushlin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Are Harris hip scores and gait mechanics related before and after THA?

Authors:  Omar A Behery; Kharma C Foucher
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Patient expectations and satisfaction in orthopaedic surgery: A review of the literature.

Authors:  Ishaan Swarup; Curtis M Henn; Lawrence V Gulotta; R Frank Henn
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-08-06

Review 4.  Measuring expectations in orthopaedic surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michael G Zywiel; Anisah Mahomed; Rajiv Gandhi; Anthony V Perruccio; Nizar N Mahomed
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  A randomized controlled trial on maximal strength training in 60 patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Siri B Winther; Olav A Foss; Otto S Husby; Tina S Wik; Jomar Klaksvik; Vigdis S Husby
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 3.717

6.  Which disease-related factors influence patients' and physicians' willingness to consider joint replacement in hip and knee OA? Results of a questionnaire survey linked to claims data.

Authors:  Anne Postler; Jens Goronzy; Klaus-Peter Günther; Toni Lange; Imke Redeker; Jochen Schmitt; Angela Zink; Johanna Callhoff
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  What does standard rehabilitation practice after total hip replacement in the UK entail? Results of a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Tosan Okoro; Ashok Ramavath; Jan Howarth; Jane Jenkinson; Peter Maddison; John G Andrew; Andrew Lemmey
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 8.  Systematic review: do patient expectations influence treatment outcomes in total knee and total hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  Tsjitske M Haanstra; Tobias van den Berg; Raymond W Ostelo; Rudolf W Poolman; Elise P Jansma; Ilse P Jansma; Pim Cuijpers; Henrica Cw de Vet
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 3.186

9.  Functional improvements desired by patients before and in the first year after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kristi Elisabeth Heiberg; Arne Ekeland; Anne Marit Mengshoel
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 2.362

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.