Literature DB >> 20198537

Self-face recognition is characterized by "bilateral gain" and by faster, more accurate performance which persists when faces are inverted.

Helen Keyes1, Nuala Brady.   

Abstract

We examine interhemispheric cooperation in the recognition of personally known faces whose long-term familiarity ensures frequent co-activation of face-sensitive areas in the right and left brain. Images of self, friend, and stranger faces were presented for 150 ms in upright and inverted orientations both unilaterally, in the right or left visual field, and bilaterally. Consistent with previous research, we find a bilateral advantage for familiar but not for unfamiliar faces, and we demonstrate that this gain occurs for inverted as well as upright faces. We show that friend faces are recognized more quickly than unfamiliar faces in upright but not in inverted orientations, suggesting that configural processing underlies this particular advantage. Novel to this study is the finding that people are faster and more accurate at recognizing their own face over both stranger and friend faces and that these advantages occur for both upright and inverted faces. These findings are consistent with evidence for a bilateral representation of self-faces.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20198537     DOI: 10.1080/17470211003611264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  28 in total

1.  Can you McGurk yourself? Self-face and self-voice in audiovisual speech.

Authors:  Christopher Aruffo; David I Shore
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-02

2.  Self-face advantage over familiar and unfamiliar faces: A three-level meta-analytic approach.

Authors:  Catherine Bortolon; Stéphane Raffard
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-08

Review 3.  The ubiquitous self: what the properties of self-bias tell us about the self.

Authors:  Jie Sui; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  Shared or separate mechanisms for self-face and other-face processing? Evidence from adaptation.

Authors:  Brendan Rooney; Helen Keyes; Nuala Brady
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-03-07

5.  Is that me or my twin? Lack of self-face recognition advantage in identical twins.

Authors:  Matteo Martini; Ilaria Bufalari; Maria Antonietta Stazi; Salvatore Maria Aglioti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Self make-up: the influence of self-referential processing on attention orienting.

Authors:  Shuo Zhao; Shota Uono; Sayaka Yoshimura; Motomi Toichi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Elevating hope among children with Attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder through virtual reality.

Authors:  Shimon Shiri; Ariel Tenenbaum; Orly Sapir-Budnero; Isaiah D Wexler
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  More or less of me and you: self-relevance augments the effects of item probability on stimulus prioritization.

Authors:  Saga L Svensson; Marius Golubickis; Hollie Maclean; Johanna K Falbén; Linn M Persson; Dimitra Tsamadi; Siobhan Caughey; Arash Sahraie; C Neil Macrae
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-07-29

9.  Does my face FIT?: a face image task reveals structure and distortions of facial feature representation.

Authors:  Christina T Fuentes; Catarina Runa; Xenxo Alvarez Blanco; Verónica Orvalho; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Different neural processes accompany self-recognition in photographs across the lifespan: an ERP study using dizygotic twins.

Authors:  David L Butler; Jason B Mattingley; Ross Cunnington; Thomas Suddendorf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.