Literature DB >> 22033846

[Low-dose computed tomography for the detection of cocaine body packs: clinical evaluation and legal issues].

G Pache1, D Einhaus, S Bulla, T Baumann, M Langer, P Blanke.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To discuss the juridical basis for CT examinations of cocaine body packers and to evaluate the clinical implementation of a tube current reduction-based low-dose CT protocol.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search was performed to discuss the legal basis regarding the problem, the procedures, the potential harm and the proportionality. Retrospective evaluation of 8 patients who had undergone a low-dose CT scan (body mass index < 25 kg/m(2) 30 mAs; > 25 kg/m(2) 60 mAs) during the time period from February until October 2009 in order to exclude or to assess remaining cocaine body packs was approved by the institutional review board. The detectability and condition of the body packs were analyzed. Effective doses were calculated.
RESULTS: German jurisdiction does not distinguish between plain film X-ray and CT examinations. Both plain film X-ray and CT examination require a judicial warrant. However, examination results might still remain valid if a warrant was not requested. In 8 examinations (30 mAs n = 3, 60 mAs n = 5, mean BMI 25.9 ± 3.2) a total of 34 body packs were correctly identified. The mean density of the body packs was 74.4 ± 31.9 HU (range 17-154 HU) with a cocaine content between 22.5% and 72.8%. The mean estimated radiation dose was 2.23 ± 0.72 mSv.
CONCLUSION: Although medical legal aspects do not specify the diagnostic procedure to be performed, the high diagnostic accuracy and applied radiation dose reduction could establish low-dose CT as the method of choice for detecting cocaine body packs, thereby potentially avoiding future legal problems. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22033846     DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1281781

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rofo        ISSN: 1438-9010


  6 in total

1.  Dual-energy CT behavior of heroin, cocaine, and typical adulterants.

Authors:  Patrick J Laberke; Juergen Fornaro; Suk-kyum Kim; Simon Blum; Marc Augsburger; Hatem Alkadhi; Simon Wildermuth; Roland Hausmann; Sebastian Leschka
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 2.007

2.  [Legal considerations regarding radiological examinations of bodypackers ordered by police officers].

Authors:  C Chiapponi; M Scherr; J Grimm
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Differentiation of heroin and cocaine using dual-energy CT-an experimental study.

Authors:  Jochen Grimm; Ramona Wudy; Edvard Ziegeler; Stefan Wirth; Michael Uhl; Maximilian F Reiser; Michael Scherr
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 2.686

4.  Walking on thin ice! Identifying methamphetamine "drug mules" on digital plain radiography.

Authors:  S N Abdul Rashid; S B Mohamad Saini; S Abdul Hamid; S J Muhammad; R Mahmud; M J Thali; P M Flach
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Low-dose CT in body-packers: delineation of body packs and radiation dose in a porcine model.

Authors:  Michael K Scherr; Oliver Peschel; Jochen M Grimm; Edvard Ziegeler; Michael Uhl; Lucas L Geyer; Maximilian F Reiser; Stefan Wirth
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 2.007

6.  Noise insertion in CT for cocaine body packing: where is the limit of extensive dose reduction?

Authors:  Joel Aissa; Edwin Bölke; Lino M Sawicki; Elisabeth Appel; Christoph Thomas; Philipp Heusch; Martin Sedlmair; Karl Krzymyk; Patric Kröpil; Gerald Antoch; Johannes Boos
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 2.175

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.