Literature DB >> 22033609

Distraction osteogenesis using a longitudinal corticotomy.

Ma'ad F Al-Saati1, Robert A Magnussen, Sebastien Lustig, Rodolphe Testa, Gazal Al-Saati, Faisal Al-Saati.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the use of a longitudinal corticotomy (S-Z osteotomy) results in more rapid consolidation following distraction osteogenesis of short tibiae.
METHODS: Sixty-seven lengthening procedures were performed in 51 patients ranging in age from nine to 38 (mean 25) years. Diagnoses included short stature (32 tibiae), postpolio limb deformity (22 tibiae), osteomyelitis (three tibiae), trauma (two tibiae) and other diagnoses (eight tibiae). Forty-five lengthenings were performed via a longitudinal corticotomy, and 22 were performed via a transverse corticotomy. Patients were followed until consolidation of the regenerated bone was noted radiographically (consolidation time). The healing index (consolidation time per centimetre of lengthening) was calculated for each patient and compared between groups.
RESULTS: The healing index was significantly lower in the S-Z group (30.8 ± 9.6 days/cm) than in the transverse corticotomy group (46.8 ± 20.2 days/cm) (p < 0.0001). Mean lengthening was 6.6 (range 2.5-12.5) cm in the S-Z group and 5.8 (range 2.0-12.0) cm in the transverse group (p = 0.28). Mean consolidation time was 6.3 ± 2.8 (range 3-16) months in the S-Z group and 8.1 ± 3.8 (range 3-13.5) months in the transverse group (p = 0.03).
CONCLUSION: The S-Z osteotomy safely reduces consolidation time of regenerative bone during distraction osteogenesis in the tibia relative to a transverse corticotomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22033609      PMCID: PMC3337093          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-011-1383-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  18 in total

1.  Reduced lengthening index by use of bifocal osteotomy in the tibia: comparison of monofocal and bifocal procedures with the Ilizarov external fixator.

Authors:  Leif Pål Kristiansen; Harald Steen
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2002-01

2.  Results of tibial lengthening with the Ilizarov technique.

Authors:  D F Stanitski; H Shahcheraghi; D A Nicker; P F Armstrong
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.324

Review 3.  Current techniques of limb lengthening.

Authors:  D Paley
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1988 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.324

4.  [The course of compact bone reparative regeneration in distraction osteosynthesis under different conditions of bone fragment fixation (experimental study)].

Authors:  G A Ilizarov; V I Lediaev; V P Shitin
Journal:  Eksp Khir Anesteziol       Date:  1969 Nov-Dec

5.  Temperature elevations in orthopaedic cutting operations.

Authors:  W R Krause; D W Bradbury; J E Kelly; E M Lunceford
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Bone mineralization at the callotasis site after completion of lengthening.

Authors:  N Maffulli; J C Cheng; A Sher; B K Ng; E Ng
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Canine leg lengthening by the Ilizarov technique. A biomechanical, radiologic, and morphologic study.

Authors:  J L Orbay; V H Frankel; J E Finkle; F J Kummer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Physical therapy management of patients undergoing limb lengthening by distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  D B Coglianese; J E Herzenberg; J A Goulet
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.751

9.  Complications of bone lengthening.

Authors:  J D Aquerreta; F Forriol; J Cañadell
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Intramedullary leg lengthening with a motorized nail.

Authors:  Andreas H Krieg; Ulrich Lenze; Bernhard M Speth; Carol C Hasler
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 3.717

View more
  2 in total

1.  Comment on Lan et al.: S-osteotomy with lengthening and then nailing compared with traditional Ilizarov method.

Authors:  Abhay Elhence; Divesh Jalan; Harish Talreja
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  S-osteotomy with lengthening and then nailing compared with traditional Ilizarov method.

Authors:  Xia Lan; Lihai Zhang; Peifu Tang; Hetao Xia; Gang Li; Aiming Peng; Yilian Han; Bangtuo Yuan; Wenpeng Xu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 3.075

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.