Literature DB >> 22033490

Differential prognostic effect of IDH1 versus IDH2 mutations in myelodysplastic syndromes: a Mayo Clinic study of 277 patients.

M M Patnaik1, C A Hanson, J M Hodnefield, T L Lasho, C M Finke, R A Knudson, R P Ketterling, A Pardanani, A Tefferi.   

Abstract

Unlike the case with acute myeloid leukemia, there is limited information on the prognostic impact of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). In the current study of 277 patients with MDS, IDH mutations were detected in 34 (12%) cases: 26 IDH2 (all R140Q) and 8 IDH1 (6 R132S and 2 R132C). Mutational frequency was 4% (2 of 56) in refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts, 12% (16 of 130) in refractory cytopenia with multilineage dysplasia, 14% (2 of 14) in MDS-unclassifiable, 14% (6 of 42) in refractory anemia with excess blasts (RAEB)-1 and 23% (8 of 35) in RAEB-2. Normal karyotype was noted in all but one IDH1-mutated cases and 13 IDH2-mutated cases. Multivariable analysis identified presence of mutant IDH1 (P=0.0004; hazard ration 4.0, 95% confidence interval 1.9-8.8), revised International Prognostic Scoring System risk category (P<0.0001), and red cell transfusion need (P=0.002) as independent predictors of inferior survival. In a similar multivariable analysis, mutant IDH1 was the only variable associated with shortened leukemia-free survival (P=0.001; hazard ration 7.0, 95% confidence interval 2.3-20.8). The presence of IDH2R140Q did not affect the overall (P=0.54) or leukemia-free (P=0.81) survival. The current study suggests a powerful adverse prognostic effect for mutant IDH1 in MDS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22033490     DOI: 10.1038/leu.2011.298

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Leukemia        ISSN: 0887-6924            Impact factor:   12.883


  51 in total

1.  Direct comparison of quantitative digital PCR and 2-hydroxyglutarate enantiomeric ratio for IDH mutant allele frequency assessment in myeloid malignancy.

Authors:  D H Wiseman; E A Struys; D P Wilks; C I Clark; M W Dennis; E E W Jansen; G S Salomons; T C P Somervaille
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 2.  Dysregulation of the TET family of epigenetic regulators in lymphoid and myeloid malignancies.

Authors:  Chan-Wang J Lio; Hiroshi Yuita; Anjana Rao
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 3.  Molecular pathophysiology of myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  R Coleman Lindsley; Benjamin L Ebert
Journal:  Annu Rev Pathol       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 23.472

Review 4.  Epigenetic regulators and their impact on therapy in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Friederike Pastore; Ross L Levine
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 9.941

5.  I walk the line: how to tell MDS from other bone marrow failure conditions.

Authors:  Lukasz P Gondek; Amy E DeZern
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.952

6.  CALR mutations are infrequent in WHO-defined refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts.

Authors:  M M Patnaik; A Belachew; C Finke; T L Lasho; C A Hanson; A Tefferi
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 7.  Integrating genetics and epigenetics in myelodysplastic syndromes: advances in pathogenesis and disease evolution.

Authors:  Guillermo Montalbán Bravo; Elinor Lee; Bryan Merchan; Hagop M Kantarjian; Guillermo García-Manero
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 6.998

8.  High concordance of genomic and cytogenetic aberrations between peripheral blood and bone marrow in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).

Authors:  A M Mohamedali; J Gäken; M Ahmed; F Malik; A E Smith; S Best; S Mian; T Gaymes; R Ireland; A G Kulasekararaj; G J Mufti
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 9.  Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia: Insights into Biology, Prognostic Factors, and Treatment.

Authors:  Giacomo Coltro; Mrinal M Patnaik
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 10.  The need for additional genetic markers for myelodysplastic syndrome stratification: what does the future hold for prognostication?

Authors:  Zaher K Otrock; Ramon V Tiu; Jaroslaw P Maciejewski; Mikkael A Sekeres
Journal:  Expert Rev Hematol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.929

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.