Literature DB >> 22033220

Spatiotemporal mechanisms of morphogen gradient interpretation.

Marcos Nahmad1, Arthur D Lander.   

Abstract

Few mechanistic ideas from the pre-molecular era of biology have had as enduring an impact as the morphogen concept. In the classical view, cells in developing embryos obtain positional information by measuring morphogen concentrations and comparing them with fixed concentration thresholds; as a result, graded morphogen distributions map into discrete spatial arrangements of gene expression. Recent studies on Hedgehog and other morphogens suggest that establishing patterns of gene expression may be less a function of absolute morphogen concentrations, than of the dynamics of signal transduction, gene expression, and gradient formation. The data point away from any universal model of morphogen interpretation and suggest that organisms use multiple mechanisms for reading out developmental signals in order to accomplish specific patterning goals.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22033220      PMCID: PMC3423890          DOI: 10.1016/j.gde.2011.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev        ISSN: 0959-437X            Impact factor:   5.578


  44 in total

Review 1.  Morphogen gradient interpretation.

Authors:  J B Gurdon; P Y Bourillot
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-10-25       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Retinoid signalling in the development of the central nervous system.

Authors:  Malcolm Maden
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Graded changes in dose of a Xenopus activin A homologue elicit stepwise transitions in embryonic cell fate.

Authors:  J B Green; J C Smith
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1990-09-27       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Morphogen gradients: from generation to interpretation.

Authors:  Katherine W Rogers; Alexander F Schier
Journal:  Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 13.827

5.  A gradient of bicoid protein in Drosophila embryos.

Authors:  W Driever; C Nüsslein-Volhard
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1988-07-01       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  The bicoid protein determines position in the Drosophila embryo in a concentration-dependent manner.

Authors:  W Driever; C Nüsslein-Volhard
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1988-07-01       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Positional information and the spatial pattern of cellular differentiation.

Authors:  L Wolpert
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1969-10       Impact factor: 2.691

8.  Mechanism by which cells estimate their location within the body.

Authors:  H F Stumpf
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1966-10-22       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  The gradient morphogen bicoid is a concentration-dependent transcriptional activator.

Authors:  G Struhl; K Struhl; P M Macdonald
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1989-06-30       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Development and determination of hairs and bristles in the milkweed bug, Oncopeltus fasciatus (Lygaeidae, Hemiptera).

Authors:  P A Lawrence
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 5.285

View more
  24 in total

1.  Low-affinity transcription factor binding sites shape morphogen responses and enhancer evolution.

Authors:  Andrea I Ramos; Scott Barolo
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  An introduction to proteoglycans and their localization.

Authors:  John R Couchman; Csilla A Pataki
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 2.479

Review 3.  How cells know where they are.

Authors:  Arthur D Lander
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  An Extra Arm May Impair the Open Hand.

Authors:  Elizabeth A McGee; Renju S Raj
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.736

Review 5.  Generation of extracellular morphogen gradients: the case for diffusion.

Authors:  Kristina S Stapornwongkul; Jean-Paul Vincent
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 53.242

6.  Distinct modes of SMAD2 chromatin binding and remodeling shape the transcriptional response to NODAL/Activin signaling.

Authors:  Davide M Coda; Tessa Gaarenstroom; Philip East; Harshil Patel; Daniel S J Miller; Anna Lobley; Nik Matthews; Aengus Stewart; Caroline S Hill
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Comparative study of non-invasive force and stress inference methods in tissue.

Authors:  S Ishihara; K Sugimura; S J Cox; I Bonnet; Y Bellaïche; F Graner
Journal:  Eur Phys J E Soft Matter       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 1.890

Review 8.  Cytonemes as specialized signaling filopodia.

Authors:  Thomas B Kornberg; Sougata Roy
Journal:  Development       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 6.868

9.  We also CanFly! The 2nd MexFly drosophila research conference.

Authors:  Fanis Missirlis; Marcos Nahmad
Journal:  Fly (Austin)       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 2.160

Review 10.  Beyond generalized hair cells: molecular cues for hair cell types.

Authors:  Israt Jahan; Ning Pan; Jennifer Kersigo; Bernd Fritzsch
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.