Literature DB >> 22031986

Waiver of informed consent in prehospital emergency health research in Australia.

Amee Morgans1.   

Abstract

Informed consent is a vital part of ethical research. In emergency health care research environments such as ambulance services and emergency departments, it is sometimes necessary to conduct trial interventions or observations without patient consent. At times where treatment is time critical, it may be impossible or inappropriate to seek consent from next of kin. Emergency medicine is one of the few areas where the process of informed consent can be waived to allow research to proceed without patient consent. This article will explore the ethics of informed consent in the prehospital emergency research context. This will include an overview of current Australian guidelines for ethical research, and recent changes in law internationally which have affected the conduct of international emergency health research. An overview of the ethical reasoning behind the waiver of informed consent in emergency research is presented, also addressing issues relating to emergency health research such as proxy consent, unconscious patients, and patient decision making capacity. The unusual circumstances encountered in the prehospital ambulance environment will also be discussed, including the dependent and coercive relationship between patients and ambulance professionals, and a lack of alternatives for care and transport for patients who refuse consent. The conflict arising from differences in medical culture and values between patients and health care professionals will also briefly be discussed. It will be argued that, while emergency care research should not require informed consent due to the restrictions of time and dependent nature of the relationship between patient and health professional, emergency health researchers still have a responsibility to consider the patients' perspective when considering the ethical issues of an emergency research project, particularly in the prehospital environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 22031986     DOI: 10.1007/bf03351323

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Monash Bioeth Rev        ISSN: 1321-2753


  20 in total

1.  Why patients do not attend cardiac rehabilitation: role of intentions and illness beliefs.

Authors:  A Cooper; G Lloyd; J Weinman; G Jackson
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Protection of human subjects in prehospital research.

Authors:  Ronald Moscati
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2002 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 3.077

3.  Consent for research in emergency situations.

Authors:  Johan Herlitz
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.262

4.  Sharing death and dying: advance directives, autonomy and the family.

Authors:  Ho Mun Chan
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.898

5.  The challenge of cultural and ethical pluralism to medical practice.

Authors:  Rob Irvine; John McPhee; Ian H Kerridge
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2002-02-18       Impact factor: 7.738

6.  Decision making in CPR: attitudes of hospital patients and healthcare professionals.

Authors:  I H Kerridge; S A Pearson; I E Rolfe; M Lowe
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1998-08-03       Impact factor: 7.738

7.  When hope makes us vulnerable: a discussion of patient-healthcare provider interactions in the context of hope.

Authors:  Christy Simpson
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.898

8.  Research ethics committees: differences and moral judgement.

Authors:  Sarah J L Edwards; Richard Ashcroft; Simon Kirchin
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.898

9.  Psychiatric and medical features of near fatal asthma.

Authors:  D A Campbell; P M Yellowlees; G McLennan; J R Coates; P A Frith; P A Gluyas; K M Latimer; C G Luke; A J Martin; R E Ruffin
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 9.139

10.  Ethical conflicts in the prehospital setting.

Authors:  J G Adams; R Arnold; L Siminoff; A B Wolfson
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 5.721

View more
  2 in total

1.  Ethical considerations in prehospital ambulance based research: qualitative interview study of expert informants.

Authors:  Stephanie Armstrong; Adele Langlois; Niroshan Siriwardena; Tom Quinn
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 2.652

Review 2.  When is it impractical to ask informed consent? A systematic review.

Authors:  Sara Jm Laurijssen; Rieke van der Graaf; Wouter B van Dijk; Ewoud Schuit; Rolf Hh Groenwold; Diederick E Grobbee; Martine C de Vries
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 2.599

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.