UNLABELLED: The transcription factor nuclear factor kappaB (NF-κB) plays diverse roles in the acute injury response to hepatic ischemia/reperfusion (I/R). Activation of NF-κB in Kupffer cells promotes inflammation through cytokine expression, whereas activation in hepatocytes may be cell protective. The interaction of receptor activator of NF-κB (RANK) and its ligand (RANKL) promotes NF-κB activation; however, this ligand-receptor system has not been studied in acute liver injury. In the current study, we sought to determine if RANK and RANKL were important in the hepatic response to I/R. Mice were subjected to partial hepatic ischemia followed by reperfusion. In some experiments, mice received recombinant RANKL or neutralizing antibodies to RANKL 1 hour prior to surgery or at reperfusion to assess the role of RANK/RANKL signaling during I/R injury. RANK was constitutively expressed in the liver and was not altered by I/R. RANK was strongly expressed in hepatocytes and very weakly expressed in Kupffer cells. Serum RANKL concentrations increased after I/R and peaked 4 hours after reperfusion. Serum levels of osteoprotegerin (OPG), a decoy receptor for RANKL, steadily increased over the 8-hour period of reperfusion. Treatment with RANKL, before ischemia or at reperfusion, increased hepatocyte NF-κB activation and significantly reduced liver injury. These beneficial effects occurred without any effect on cytokine expression or liver inflammation. Treatment with anti-RANKL antibodies had no effect on liver I/R injury. CONCLUSION: During the course of injury, endogenous OPG appears to suppress the effects of RANKL. However, exogenous administration of RANKL, given either prophylactically or postinjury, reduces liver injury in a manner associated with increased hepatocyte NF-κB activation. The data suggest that RANK/RANKL may be a viable therapeutic target in acute liver injury.
UNLABELLED: The transcription factor nuclear factor kappaB (NF-κB) plays diverse roles in the acute injury response to hepatic ischemia/reperfusion (I/R). Activation of NF-κB in Kupffer cells promotes inflammation through cytokine expression, whereas activation in hepatocytes may be cell protective. The interaction of receptor activator of NF-κB (RANK) and its ligand (RANKL) promotes NF-κB activation; however, this ligand-receptor system has not been studied in acute liver injury. In the current study, we sought to determine if RANK and RANKL were important in the hepatic response to I/R. Mice were subjected to partial hepatic ischemia followed by reperfusion. In some experiments, mice received recombinant RANKL or neutralizing antibodies to RANKL 1 hour prior to surgery or at reperfusion to assess the role of RANK/RANKL signaling during I/R injury. RANK was constitutively expressed in the liver and was not altered by I/R. RANK was strongly expressed in hepatocytes and very weakly expressed in Kupffer cells. Serum RANKL concentrations increased after I/R and peaked 4 hours after reperfusion. Serum levels of osteoprotegerin (OPG), a decoy receptor for RANKL, steadily increased over the 8-hour period of reperfusion. Treatment with RANKL, before ischemia or at reperfusion, increased hepatocyte NF-κB activation and significantly reduced liver injury. These beneficial effects occurred without any effect on cytokine expression or liver inflammation. Treatment with anti-RANKL antibodies had no effect on liver I/R injury. CONCLUSION: During the course of injury, endogenous OPG appears to suppress the effects of RANKL. However, exogenous administration of RANKL, given either prophylactically or postinjury, reduces liver injury in a manner associated with increased hepatocyte NF-κB activation. The data suggest that RANK/RANKL may be a viable therapeutic target in acute liver injury.
Authors: G Bilbao; J L Contreras; D E Eckhoff; G Mikheeva; V Krasnykh; J T Douglas; F T Thomas; J M Thomas; D T Curiel Journal: Ann Surg Date: 1999-08 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: W S Simonet; D L Lacey; C R Dunstan; M Kelley; M S Chang; R Lüthy; H Q Nguyen; S Wooden; L Bennett; T Boone; G Shimamoto; M DeRose; R Elliott; A Colombero; H L Tan; G Trail; J Sullivan; E Davy; N Bucay; L Renshaw-Gegg; T M Hughes; D Hill; W Pattison; P Campbell; S Sander; G Van; J Tarpley; P Derby; R Lee; W J Boyle Journal: Cell Date: 1997-04-18 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: T Nakashima; Y Kobayashi; S Yamasaki; A Kawakami; K Eguchi; H Sasaki; H Sakai Journal: Biochem Biophys Res Commun Date: 2000-09-07 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: D M Anderson; E Maraskovsky; W L Billingsley; W C Dougall; M E Tometsko; E R Roux; M C Teepe; R F DuBose; D Cosman; L Galibert Journal: Nature Date: 1997-11-13 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Maria Grazia Ruocco; Shin Maeda; Jin Mo Park; Toby Lawrence; Li-Chung Hsu; Yixue Cao; Georg Schett; Erwin F Wagner; Michael Karin Journal: J Exp Med Date: 2005-05-16 Impact factor: 14.307
Authors: Bingfang Hu; Yan Guo; Wojciech G Garbacz; Mengxi Jiang; Meishu Xu; Hai Huang; Allan Tsung; Timothy R Billiar; Sadeesh K Ramakrishnan; Yatrik M Shah; Karen S L Lam; Min Huang; Wen Xie Journal: J Hepatol Date: 2015-06-10 Impact factor: 25.083
Authors: Michael Zimmerman; Eunyoung Tak; Maria Kaplan; Mercedes Susan Mandell; Holger K Eltzschig; Almut Grenz Journal: J Vis Exp Date: 2012-08-07 Impact factor: 1.355