Literature DB >> 22030672

In glucose-limited continuous culture the minimum substrate concentration for growth, Smin, is crucial in the competition between the enterobacterium Escherichia coli and Chelatobacter heintzii, an environmentally abundant bacterium.

Hans Peter Füchslin1, Christian Schneider, Thomas Egli.   

Abstract

The competition for glucose between Escherichia coli ML30, a typical copiotrophic enterobacterium and Chelatobacter heintzii ATCC29600, an environmentally successful strain, was studied in a carbon-limited culture at low dilution rates. First, as a base for modelling, the kinetic parameters μ(max) and K(s) were determined for growth with glucose. For both strains, μ(max) was determined in batch culture after different precultivation conditions. In the case of C. heintzii, μ(max) was virtually independent of precultivation conditions. When inoculated into a glucose-excess batch culture medium from a glucose-limited chemostat run at a dilution rate of 0.075 h(-1) C. heintzii grew immediately with a μ(max) of 0.17 ± 0.03 h(-1). After five transfers in batch culture, μ(max) had increased only slightly to 0.18 ± 0.03 h(-1). A different pattern was observed in the case of E. coli. Inoculated from a glucose-limited chemostat at D = 0.075 h(-1) into glucose-excess batch medium E. coli grew only after an acceleration phase of ~3.5 h with a μ(max) of 0.52 h(-1). After 120 generations and several transfers into fresh medium, μ(max) had increased to 0.80 ± 0.03 h(-1). For long-term adapted chemostat-cultivated cells, a K(s) for glucose of 15 μg l(-1) for C. heintzii, and of 35 μg l(-1) for E. coli, respectively, was determined in (14)C-labelled glucose uptake experiments. In competition experiments, the population dynamics of the mixed culture was determined using specific surface antibodies against C. heintzii and a specific 16S rRNA probe for E. coli. C. heintzii outcompeted E. coli in glucose-limited continuous culture at the low dilution rates of 0.05 and 0.075 h(-1). Using the determined pure culture parameter values for K(s) and μ(max), it was only possible to simulate the population dynamics during competition with an extended form of the Monod model, which includes a finite substrate concentration at zero growth rate (s(min)). The values estimated for s(min) were dependent on growth rate; at D = 0.05 h(-1), it was 12.6 and 0 μg l(-1) for E. coli and C. heintzii, respectively. To fit the data at D=0.075 h(-1), s(min) for E. coli had to be raised to 34.9 μg l(-1) whereas s(min) for C. heintzii remained zero. The results of the mathematical simulation suggest that it is not so much the higher K(s) value, which is responsible for the unsuccessful competition of E. coli at low residual glucose concentration, but rather the existence of a significant s(min).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22030672      PMCID: PMC3309354          DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2011.143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ISME J        ISSN: 1751-7362            Impact factor:   10.302


  32 in total

1.  Kinetics of bacterial growth: relationship between population density and specific growth rate of continuous cultures.

Authors:  D E CONTOIS
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1959-08

2.  The Relation of Concentration of Food Supply to the Generation-time of Bacteria.

Authors:  W J Penfold; D Norris
Journal:  J Hyg (Lond)       Date:  1912-12

3.  Metabolic regulation in bacterial continuous cultures: I.

Authors:  S Baloo; D Ramkrishna
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  1991-12-20       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 4.  Growth kinetics of suspended microbial cells: from single-substrate-controlled growth to mixed-substrate kinetics.

Authors:  K Kovárová-Kovar; T Egli
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 11.056

5.  Sources of Escherichia coli in a coastal subtropical environment.

Authors:  H M Solo-Gabriele; M A Wolfert; T R Desmarais; C J Palmer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Measurement of minimum substrate concentration (Smin) in a recycling fermentor and its prediction from the kinetic parameters of Pseudomonas strain B13 from batch and chemostat cultures.

Authors:  M E Tros; T N Bosma; G Schraa; A J Zehnder
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 7.  Growth kinetics and competition--some contemporary comments.

Authors:  J C Gottschal
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.271

8.  The growth of Escherichia coli in glucose-limited chemostat cultures: a re-examination of the kinetics.

Authors:  H Senn; U Lendenmann; M Snozzi; G Hamer; T Egli
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1994-12-15

9.  Glucose transport of Escherichia coli growing in glucose-limited continuous culture.

Authors:  I S Hunter; H L Kornberg
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1979-01-15       Impact factor: 3.857

10.  Survival of Escherichia coli and Campylobacter jejuni in untreated and filtered lake water.

Authors:  L K Korhonen; P J Martikainen
Journal:  J Appl Bacteriol       Date:  1991-10
View more
  6 in total

1.  A defined, glucose-limited mineral medium for the cultivation of Listeria spp.

Authors:  Rudolf Schneebeli; Thomas Egli
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Maintenance power requirements of anammox bacteria "Candidatus Brocadia sinica" and "Candidatus Scalindua sp."

Authors:  Satoshi Okabe; Atsushi Kamigaito; Kanae Kobayashi
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 10.302

3.  Growth of bacteria in 3-d colonies.

Authors:  Xinxian Shao; Andrew Mugler; Justin Kim; Ha Jun Jeong; Bruce R Levin; Ilya Nemenman
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 4.475

4.  Evolutionarily Stable Coevolution Between a Plastic Lytic Virus and Its Microbial Host.

Authors:  Melinda Choua; Michael R Heath; Juan A Bonachela
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Bridging substrate intake kinetics and bacterial growth phenotypes with flux balance analysis incorporating proteome allocation.

Authors:  Hong Zeng; Aidong Yang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Solutions in microbiome engineering: prioritizing barriers to organism establishment.

Authors:  Michaeline B N Albright; Stilianos Louca; Daniel E Winkler; Kelli L Feeser; Sarah-Jane Haig; Katrine L Whiteson; Joanne B Emerson; John Dunbar
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2021-08-21       Impact factor: 10.302

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.