| Literature DB >> 22029430 |
Dixon Chibanda1, Petra Mesu, Lazarus Kajawu, Frances Cowan, Ricardo Araya, Melanie A Abas.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is limited evidence that interventions for depression and other common mental disorders (CMD) can be integrated sustainably into primary health care in Africa. We aimed to pilot a low-cost multi-component 'Friendship Bench Intervention' for CMD, locally adapted from problem-solving therapy and delivered by trained and supervised female lay workers to learn if was feasible and possibly effective as well as how best to implement it on a larger scale.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22029430 PMCID: PMC3210104 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-828
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Figure 1Some of the lay health workers involved in the Friendship Bench project, sitting in front of one of the Benches.
Features of Friendship Bench Intervention
| Theoretical basis | Based on problem-solving therapy |
|---|---|
| Lay health workers (Health promoters). Mean age 58 sd 8.3, all female, mean years of education 8 sd 3.3, previous training in home based care for people living with HIV & AIDS, in community follow-up of persons on TB treatment and in delivering community health education and promotion e.g. through encouraging immunisation and methods to control disease outbreaks | |
| Six weekly sessions of 30-45 minutes delivered through the Friendship Bench over six weeks, including one or two home visits. | |
| Multiple Symptoms Card seven step treatment plan, Referral manual | |
| Two-week training before onset of Friendship Bench. Ongoing training every two weeks for the first six months; thereafter monthly. | |
| Weekly one-hour group supervision by a general nurse with training in counselling. Group supervision from a clinical psychologist one hour every two weeks; group supervision by a psychiatrist every four weeks, 45 minutes. | |
Figure 2Flow diagram of recruitment into the study.
Characteristics of individuals scoring above the cut off score (> = 8) at baseline on the Shona Symptom Questionnaire (n = 395)
| Declined | Participated | Loss to f/up | Excluded | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.8 (2.5) | 11.3 (1.4) | 10.2(1.4) | 11.8 (1.2) | |
| 26 (6.5) | 27(7.0) | 27(5.6) | 29(6.0) | |
| 3(42%) | 223 (70%) | 40(40%) | 23(69%) | |
| Clinic staff | 3(43%) | 113(35%) | 11(31%) | 15(45%) |
| Lay Workers | 1 (14%) | 75(24%) | 9(26%) | 10(30%) |
| Friend/relative | 1(14%) | 41(13%) | 4(11%) | 3(9%) |
| Self referral | 2(28%) | 40(12%) | 2(6%) | 4(12%) |
| Other referrals | 0 (0%) | 51(16%) | 9(26%) | 1(3%) |
| 1(14%) | 38(12%) | 8(23%) | 5(15%) | |
| Married | 3(43%) | 182(57%) | 14(41%) | 16(48%) |
| Widowed | 2(28%) | 90(28%) | 84(24%) | 6(18%) |
| Divorced/single | 2(28%) | 48(15%) | 9(25%) | 11 (34%) |
| Somatic complaint | 1(14%) | 58(18%) | 3(8%) | 7(21%) |
| HIV-related | 3(43%) | 166(52%) | 9(26%) | 10(30%) |
| Domestic violence | 1(14%) | 54(17%) | 11(33%) | 7(21%) |
| Other | 2(29%) | 42(13%) | 12(34%) | 9(28%) |
Drop in Shona Symptom Questionnaire score at 6 weeks after starting the intervention according to number of sessions attended
| Number of sessions attended | N (%) | Regression | 95% Confidence | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 63 (20%) | 0.31755 | -0.13 to .019 | 0.698 | |
| 96 (30%) | -.780712 | -1.46 to -0.11 | 0.024 | |
| 66 (21%) | -1.758163 | -2.49 to -1.03 | 0.000 | |
| 95 (30%) | -3.258465 | -3.93 to -2.59 | 0.000 | |
| 320 | ||||
Regression models adjusted by Shona Symptom Questionnaire score baseline scores