BACKGROUND: Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare and highly aggressive form of primary breast cancer. Little is known about the risk factors for IBC, specifically the association with socioeconomic position (SEP). METHODS: The association between breast cancer type (IBC vs. non-IBC) with county-level SEP in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database for cases diagnosed from 2000 to 2007 was examined. County-level SEP characteristics included metropolitan versus non-metropolitan residence, percentage below the poverty level, percentage less than high-school graduate, and an index combining the poverty and high-school variables. IBC and non-IBC age-adjusted incidence rates were calculated, stratified on SEP and race/ethnicity. The odds of IBC versus non-IBC given a particular SEP characteristic, adjusting for age and race/ethnicity, was examined through fitting of hierarchical logistic regression models (HLM). RESULTS: Incidence rates for IBC generally increased as SEP decreased, whereas the opposite was found for non-IBC. HLM results showed that low SEP is associated with higher odds of IBC: highest (≥ 20%) versus lowest (<10%) persons below the poverty level [OR (95% confidence interval, CI) = 1.25 (1.09-1.43)]; highest (>28.76%) versus lowest (≤ 15.99%) persons less than high-school graduate [OR (95% CI) = 1.25 (1.10-1.42)]; and low SEP as measured by poverty-high school index versus high SEP [OR (95% CI)= 1.26 (1.11-1.44)]. CONCLUSION: Overall breast cancer has been found to be positively associated with SEP, whereas in this analysis, IBC was associated with decreasing SEP. IMPACT: Studies focused on understanding the disparity in IBC incidence, as well as interventions to eliminate these differences are needed.
BACKGROUND:Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare and highly aggressive form of primary breast cancer. Little is known about the risk factors for IBC, specifically the association with socioeconomic position (SEP). METHODS: The association between breast cancer type (IBC vs. non-IBC) with county-level SEP in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database for cases diagnosed from 2000 to 2007 was examined. County-level SEP characteristics included metropolitan versus non-metropolitan residence, percentage below the poverty level, percentage less than high-school graduate, and an index combining the poverty and high-school variables. IBC and non-IBC age-adjusted incidence rates were calculated, stratified on SEP and race/ethnicity. The odds of IBC versus non-IBC given a particular SEP characteristic, adjusting for age and race/ethnicity, was examined through fitting of hierarchical logistic regression models (HLM). RESULTS: Incidence rates for IBC generally increased as SEP decreased, whereas the opposite was found for non-IBC. HLM results showed that low SEP is associated with higher odds of IBC: highest (≥ 20%) versus lowest (<10%) persons below the poverty level [OR (95% confidence interval, CI) = 1.25 (1.09-1.43)]; highest (>28.76%) versus lowest (≤ 15.99%) persons less than high-school graduate [OR (95% CI) = 1.25 (1.10-1.42)]; and low SEP as measured by poverty-high school index versus high SEP [OR (95% CI)= 1.26 (1.11-1.44)]. CONCLUSION: Overall breast cancer has been found to be positively associated with SEP, whereas in this analysis, IBC was associated with decreasing SEP. IMPACT: Studies focused on understanding the disparity in IBC incidence, as well as interventions to eliminate these differences are needed.
Authors: Nancy Krieger; Jarvis T Chen; Pamela D Waterman; Mah-Jabeen Soobader; S V Subramanian; Rosa Carson Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2002-09-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Stephanie A Robert; Indiana Strombom; Amy Trentham-Dietz; John M Hampton; Jane A McElroy; Polly A Newcomb; Patrick L Remington Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Shaheenah Dawood; Kristine Broglio; Yun Gong; Wei-Tse Yang; Massimo Cristofanilli; Shu-Wan Kau; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Thomas A Buchholz; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo Journal: Cancer Date: 2008-05-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Jennifer A Schlichting; Amr S Soliman; Catherine Schairer; David Schottenfeld; Sofia D Merajver Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2012-06-26 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Muthana Al Abo; Larisa Gearhart-Serna; Steven Van Laere; Jennifer A Freedman; Steven R Patierno; Eun-Sil Shelley Hwang; Savitri Krishnamurthy; Kevin P Williams; Gayathri R Devi Journal: NPJ Breast Cancer Date: 2022-06-13
Authors: Catherine Schairer; Yan Li; Peter Frawley; Barry I Graubard; Robert D Wellman; Diana S M Buist; Karla Kerlikowske; Tracy L Onega; William F Anderson; Diana L Miglioretti Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2013-09-18 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Kelly A Hirko; Amr S Soliman; Mousumi Banerjee; Julie Ruterbusch; Joe B Harford; Sofia D Merajver; Kendra Schwartz Journal: Breast J Date: 2013-12-26 Impact factor: 2.431
Authors: Brittany N Morey; Gilbert C Gee; May C Wang; Ondine S von Ehrenstein; Salma Shariff-Marco; Alison J Canchola; Juan Yang; Sandra S-J Lee; Roxanna Bautista; Winston Tseng; Pancho Chang; Scarlett Lin Gomez Journal: J Immigr Minor Health Date: 2021-04-12
Authors: Tomi F Akinyemiju; Jeanine M Genkinger; Maggie Farhat; Adrienne Wilson; Tiffany L Gary-Webb; Parisa Tehranifar Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2015-03-28 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Kelly A Hirko; Amr S Soliman; Mousumi Banerjee; Julie Ruterbusch; Joe B Harford; Robert M Chamberlain; John J Graff; Sofia D Merajver; Kendra Schwartz Journal: Springerplus Date: 2013-01-07
Authors: Ryan A Denu; John M Hampton; Adam Currey; Roger T Anderson; Rosemary D Cress; Steven T Fleming; Joseph Lipscomb; Xiao-Cheng Wu; J Frank Wilson; Amy Trentham-Dietz Journal: J Cancer Epidemiol Date: 2017-08-15