Literature DB >> 22028060

Uterine activity monitoring during labour--a multi-centre, blinded two-way trial of external tocodynamometry against electrohysterography.

J Reinhard1, B R Hayes-Gill, S Schiermeier, H Löser, L M Niedballa, E Haarmann, A Sonnwald, W Hatzmann, T M Heinrich, F Louwen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the quality of intrapartum uterine activity (UA) monitoring in daily practice during the first and second stages of labour. The total duration of inadequate UA monitoring is quantified in relation to the technique applied, namely, external tocodynamometry (TOCO) or electrohysterography (EHG).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: 144 UA recordings, collected from 1st September 2008 until 15th October 2009 from deliveries at the Marien-Hospital Witten, Germany, were analysed by obstetricians based at different centres. The included recordings were from singleton and simultaneously with external TOCO and EHG monitored pregnancies. External TOCO and EHG UA recordings were blinded.
RESULTS: The percentages of "adequate" UA recordings in the first and second stages of labour were much higher for the external EHG than the external TOCO mode (p<0.001). All doctors evaluated the UA assessment as "easier" (p <0.001) using the EHG compared with TOCO.
CONCLUSION: Intrapartum UA monitoring in -daily practice via the EHG mode provides a more recognisable UA trace than the TOCO. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22028060     DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1291210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol        ISSN: 0948-2393            Impact factor:   0.685


  7 in total

1.  Non-invasive Foetal ECG - a Comparable Alternative to the Doppler CTG?

Authors:  J Reinhard; F Louwen
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.915

2.  Prenatal Foetal Non-invasive ECG instead of Doppler CTG - A Better Alternative?

Authors:  N Sänger; B R Hayes-Gill; S Schiermeier; W Hatzmann; J Yuan; E Herrmann; F Louwen; J Reinhard
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.915

3.  Monitoring uterine activity during labor: a comparison of 3 methods.

Authors:  Tammy Y Euliano; Minh Tam Nguyen; Shalom Darmanjian; Susan P McGorray; Neil Euliano; Allison Onkala; Anthony R Gregg
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Development of Electrohysterogram Recording System for Monitoring Uterine Contraction.

Authors:  Dongmei Hao; Yang An; Xiangyun Qiao; Qian Qiu; Xiya Zhou; Jin Peng
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 2.682

5.  Study protocol: PoPE-Prediction of Preterm delivery by Electrohysterography.

Authors:  Hinke de Lau; Chiara Rabotti; Herman P Oosterbaan; Massimo Mischi; Guid S Oei
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Velocity and directionality of the electrohysterographic signal propagation.

Authors:  Lasse Lange; Anders Vaeggemose; Preben Kidmose; Eva Mikkelsen; Niels Uldbjerg; Peter Johansen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Uterine Monitoring Techniques from Patients' and Users' Perspectives.

Authors:  Kirsten M J Thijssen; Marion W C Vlemminx; Michelle E M H Westerhuis; Jeanne P Dieleman; M Beatrijs Van der Hout-Van der Jagt; S Guid Oei
Journal:  AJP Rep       Date:  2018-09-14
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.