Literature DB >> 22027841

Correct end use during end joining of multiple chromosomal double strand breaks is influenced by repair protein RAD50, DNA-dependent protein kinase DNA-PKcs, and transcription context.

Amanda Gunn1, Nicole Bennardo, Anita Cheng, Jeremy M Stark.   

Abstract

During repair of multiple chromosomal double strand breaks (DSBs), matching the correct DSB ends is essential to limit rearrangements. To investigate the maintenance of correct end use, we examined repair of two tandem noncohesive DSBs generated by endonuclease I-SceI and the 3' nonprocessive exonuclease Trex2, which can be expressed as an I-SceI-Trex2 fusion. We examined end joining (EJ) repair that maintains correct ends (proximal-EJ) versus using incorrect ends (distal-EJ), which provides a relative measure of incorrect end use (distal end use). Previous studies showed that ATM is important to limit distal end use. Here we show that DNA-PKcs kinase activity and RAD50 are also important to limit distal end use, but that H2AX is dispensable. In contrast, we find that ATM, DNA-PKcs, and RAD50 have distinct effects on repair events requiring end processing. Furthermore, we developed reporters to examine the effects of the transcription context on DSB repair, using an inducible promoter. We find that a DSB downstream from an active promoter shows a higher frequency of distal end use, and a greater reliance on ATM for limiting incorrect end use. Conversely, DSB transcription context does not affect end processing during EJ, the frequency of homology-directed repair, or the role of RAD50 and DNA-PKcs in limiting distal end use. We suggest that RAD50, DNA-PKcs kinase activity, and transcription context are each important to limit incorrect end use during EJ repair of multiple DSBs, but that these factors and conditions have distinct roles during repair events requiring end processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22027841      PMCID: PMC3234933          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M111.309252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  73 in total

1.  Double strand break repair by homologous recombination is regulated by cell cycle-independent signaling via ATM in human glioma cells.

Authors:  Sarah E Golding; Elizabeth Rosenberg; Ashraf Khalil; Alison McEwen; Matthew Holmes; Steven Neill; Lawrence F Povirk; Kristoffer Valerie
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2004-01-26       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 2.  Rad51 recombinase and recombination mediators.

Authors:  Patrick Sung; Lumir Krejci; Stephen Van Komen; Michael G Sehorn
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2003-08-11       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Efficient selection for high-expression transfectants with a novel eukaryotic vector.

Authors:  H Niwa; K Yamamura; J Miyazaki
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1991-12-15       Impact factor: 3.688

4.  Genetic steps of mammalian homologous repair with distinct mutagenic consequences.

Authors:  Jeremy M Stark; Andrew J Pierce; Jin Oh; Albert Pastink; Maria Jasin
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  The role of DNA dependent protein kinase in synapsis of DNA ends.

Authors:  Eric Weterings; Nicole S Verkaik; Hennie T Brüggenwirth; Jan H J Hoeijmakers; Dik C van Gent
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Ku regulates the non-homologous end joining pathway choice of DNA double-strand break repair in human somatic cells.

Authors:  Farjana Fattah; Eu Han Lee; Natalie Weisensel; Yongbao Wang; Natalie Lichter; Eric A Hendrickson
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 5.917

7.  Histone H2AX: a dosage-dependent suppressor of oncogenic translocations and tumors.

Authors:  Craig H Bassing; Heikyung Suh; David O Ferguson; Katrin F Chua; John Manis; Mark Eckersdorff; Megan Gleason; Rodrick Bronson; Charles Lee; Frederick W Alt
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2003-08-08       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Interactive competition between homologous recombination and non-homologous end joining.

Authors:  Chris Allen; James Halbrook; Jac A Nickoloff
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.852

9.  The mutagenic potential of a single DNA double-strand break in a mammalian chromosome is not influenced by transcription.

Authors:  Chris Allen; Cheryl A Miller; Jac A Nickoloff
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2003-10-07

10.  Radiosensitization and DNA repair inhibition by the combined use of novel inhibitors of DNA-dependent protein kinase and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1.

Authors:  Stephany J Veuger; Nicola J Curtin; Caroline J Richardson; Graeme C M Smith; Barbara W Durkacz
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2003-09-15       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  63 in total

1.  Visualization of local DNA unwinding by Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1 using single-molecule FRET.

Authors:  Brian Cannon; Jeffrey Kuhnlein; Soo-Hyun Yang; Anita Cheng; Detlev Schindler; Jeremy M Stark; Rick Russell; Tanya T Paull
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A potential new role of ATM inhibitor in radiotherapy: suppressing ionizing Radiation-Activated EGFR.

Authors:  Siyuan Tang; Zhentian Li; Lifang Yang; Liangfang Shen; Ya Wang
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 2.694

3.  RING finger nuclear factor RNF168 is important for defects in homologous recombination caused by loss of the breast cancer susceptibility factor BRCA1.

Authors:  Meilen C Muñoz; Corentin Laulier; Amanda Gunn; Anita Cheng; Davide F Robbiani; André Nussenzweig; Jeremy M Stark
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Preventing over-resection by DNA2 helicase/nuclease suppresses repair defects in Fanconi anemia cells.

Authors:  Kenneth K Karanja; Eu Han Lee; Eric A Hendrickson; Judith L Campbell
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 4.534

5.  Characterization of Cardiac Glycoside Natural Products as Potent Inhibitors of DNA Double-Strand Break Repair by a Whole-Cell Double Immunofluorescence Assay.

Authors:  Yulia V Surovtseva; Vikram Jairam; Ahmed F Salem; Ranjini K Sundaram; Ranjit S Bindra; Seth B Herzon
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 15.419

6.  Inhibition of FoxM1-Mediated DNA Repair by Imipramine Blue Suppresses Breast Cancer Growth and Metastasis.

Authors:  Subapriya Rajamanickam; Subbarayalu Panneerdoss; Aparna Gorthi; Santosh Timilsina; Benjamin Onyeagucha; Dmytro Kovalskyy; Dmitri Ivanov; Martha A Hanes; Ratna K Vadlamudi; Yidong Chen; Alexander J Bishop; Jack L Arbiser; Manjeet K Rao
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Musashi1 Impacts Radio-Resistance in Glioblastoma by Controlling DNA-Protein Kinase Catalytic Subunit.

Authors:  Patricia Rosa de Araujo; Aparna Gorthi; Acarizia E da Silva; Sonal S Tonapi; Dat T Vo; Suzanne C Burns; Mei Qiao; Philip J Uren; Zhi-Min Yuan; Alexander J R Bishop; Luiz O F Penalva
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 4.307

8.  Local DNA Repair Inhibition for Sustained Radiosensitization of High-Grade Gliomas.

Authors:  Amanda R King; Christopher D Corso; Evan M Chen; Eric Song; Paul Bongiorni; Zhe Chen; Ranjini K Sundaram; Ranjit S Bindra; W Mark Saltzman
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 6.261

Review 9.  Regulation of Single-Strand Annealing and its Role in Genome Maintenance.

Authors:  Ragini Bhargava; David O Onyango; Jeremy M Stark
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 11.639

10.  Differential contribution of HP1 proteins to DNA end resection and homology-directed repair.

Authors:  Gaston Soria; Geneviève Almouzni
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 4.534

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.