BACKGROUND: Primary medical care may improve colorectal cancer (CRC) outcomes through increased use of CRC screening tests and earlier diagnosis. We examined the association between primary care utilization and CRC screening, stage at diagnosis, CRC mortality, and all-cause mortality. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients, aged 67 to 85 years, diagnosed as having CRC between 1994 and 2005 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare-linked database. Association of the number of visits to primary care physicians (PCPs) in the 3- to 27-month period before the CRC diagnosis and CRC screening, early-stage diagnosis, CRC mortality, and all-cause mortality were examined using multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: The odds of CRC screening and early-stage diagnosis increased with increasing number of PCP visits (P < .001 for trend). Compared with persons having 0 or 1 PCP visit, patients with 5 to 10 visits had increased odds of ever receiving CRC screening at least 3 months before diagnosis (adjusted odds ratio, 2.60; 95% CI, 2.48-2.72) and early-stage diagnosis (1.35; 1.29-1.42). Persons with 5 to 10 visits had 16% lower CRC mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 0.84; 95% CI, 0.80-0.88) and 6% lower all-cause mortality (0.94; 0.91-0.97) compared with persons with 0 or 1 visit. CONCLUSIONS: Medicare beneficiaries with CRC have better outcomes if they have greater utilization of primary care before diagnosis. Revitalization of primary care in the United States may help strengthen the national efforts to reduce the burden of CRC.
BACKGROUND: Primary medical care may improve colorectal cancer (CRC) outcomes through increased use of CRC screening tests and earlier diagnosis. We examined the association between primary care utilization and CRC screening, stage at diagnosis, CRC mortality, and all-cause mortality. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients, aged 67 to 85 years, diagnosed as having CRC between 1994 and 2005 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare-linked database. Association of the number of visits to primary care physicians (PCPs) in the 3- to 27-month period before the CRC diagnosis and CRC screening, early-stage diagnosis, CRC mortality, and all-cause mortality were examined using multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: The odds of CRC screening and early-stage diagnosis increased with increasing number of PCP visits (P < .001 for trend). Compared with persons having 0 or 1 PCP visit, patients with 5 to 10 visits had increased odds of ever receiving CRC screening at least 3 months before diagnosis (adjusted odds ratio, 2.60; 95% CI, 2.48-2.72) and early-stage diagnosis (1.35; 1.29-1.42). Persons with 5 to 10 visits had 16% lower CRC mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 0.84; 95% CI, 0.80-0.88) and 6% lower all-cause mortality (0.94; 0.91-0.97) compared with persons with 0 or 1 visit. CONCLUSIONS: Medicare beneficiaries with CRC have better outcomes if they have greater utilization of primary care before diagnosis. Revitalization of primary care in the United States may help strengthen the national efforts to reduce the burden of CRC.
Authors: Kathleen Lang; Jonathan R Korn; David W Lee; Lisa M Lines; Craig C Earle; Joseph Menzin Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2009-07-13 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Jose M Valderas; Barbara Starfield; Christopher B Forrest; Bonnie Sibbald; Martin Roland Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2009 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: M Alan Brookhart; Amanda R Patrick; Colin Dormuth; Jerry Avorn; William Shrank; Suzanne M Cadarette; Daniel H Solomon Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2007-05-15 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Richard G Roetzheim; Ji-Hyun Lee; Jeanne M Ferrante; Eduardo C Gonzalez; Ren Chen; Kate J Fisher; Kymia Love-Jackson; Ellen P McCarthy Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2013 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: K R Enard; L Nevarez; M Hernandez; S R Hovick; M R Moguel; R A Hajek; C E Blinka; L A Jones; I Torres-Vigil Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2015-06-25 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Karly A Murphy; Gail L Daumit; Emma E McGinty; Elizabeth M Stone; Alene Kennedy-Hendricks Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2021-09-19 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Kate J Fisher; Ji-Hyun Lee; Jeanne M Ferrante; Ellen P McCarthy; Eduardo C Gonzalez; Ren Chen; Kymia Love-Jackson; Richard G Roetzheim Journal: Cancer Date: 2013-05-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Richard G Roetzheim; Jeanne M Ferrante; Ji-Hyun Lee; Ren Chen; Kymia M Love-Jackson; Eduardo C Gonzalez; Kate J Fisher; Ellen P McCarthy Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2012 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: David M Mosen; Adrianne C Feldstein; Nancy A Perrin; A Gabriella Rosales; David H Smith; Elizabeth G Liles; Jennifer L Schneider; Ronald E Meyers; Jennifer Elston-Lafata Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Jeanne M Ferrante; Ji-Hyun Lee; Ellen P McCarthy; Kate J Fisher; Ren Chen; Eduardo C Gonzalez; Kymia Love-Jackson; Richard G Roetzheim Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2013-10-01 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Kenneth F Adams; Eric A Johnson; Jessica Chubak; Aruna Kamineni; Chyke A Doubeni; Diana S M Buist; Andrew E Williams; Sheila Weinmann; V Paul Doria-Rose; Carolyn M Rutter Journal: EGEMS (Wash DC) Date: 2015-05-18
Authors: David Goldsbury; Mark Harris; Shane Pascoe; Michael Barton; Ian Olver; Allan Spigelman; Justin Beilby; Craig Veitch; David Weller; Dianne L O'Connell Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2013-03-06 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Kevin M Gorey; Emma Bartfay; Sindu M Kanjeekal; Frances C Wright; Caroline Hamm; Isaac N Luginaah; Guangyong Zou; Eric J Holowaty; Nancy L Richter; Madhan K Balagurusamy Journal: BMJ Support Palliat Care Date: 2016-08-23 Impact factor: 4.633