Literature DB >> 22024900

Augment bone graft products compare favorably with autologous bone graft in an ovine model of lumbar interbody spine fusion.

Luis A Solchaga1, Christopher K Hee, Dean J Aguiar, Jack Ratliff, A Simon Turner, Howard B Seim, Jeffrey O Hollinger, Leo B Snel, Samuel E Lynch.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: This study was designed to determine whether Augment Bone Graft (Augment, Biomimetic Therapeutics, Inc., Franklin, TN) and Augment Injectable Bone Graft (Augment Injectable, Biomimetic Therapeutics, Inc., Franklin, TN), 2 combination devices comprising recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor-BB and β-tricalcium phosphate-containing matrices, promote bone bridging in an ovine model of lumbar spine fusion. Autologous bone graft (autograft) was used as a positive control.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the ability of Augment products to promote fusion of the L2-L3 and L4-L5 vertebral bodies in an ovine model. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: In interbody spine fusion, the intervertebral disc is removed and a spacer is inserted for support and to facilitate bone growth. The fusion is commonly enhanced with grafts. Autograft is the "gold standard" but it has limitations including availability and donor-site morbidity. Synthetic graft substitutes eliminate these complications. Augment products are combination devices including recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor-BB, a well-characterized chemotactic, mitogenic, and proangiogenic protein essential in wound and bone healing.
METHODS: Twenty-two sheep received an uninstrumented, double-level, interbody lumbar spinal fusion procedure using a polyetheretherketone spacer, which was either empty or packed with iliac crest autograft, Augment or Augment Injectable. The same treatment was used at both levels. Animals were 24 weeks after surgery, and fusion was assessed by micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) and histology.
RESULTS: Micro-CT and histologic assessment of fusion revealed that empty controls had significantly lower fusion rates. No differences were detected among autografts, Augment, and Augment Injectable-treated specimens. Residual β-tricalcium phosphate particles embedded in the newly formed bone were visible in Augment- and Augment Injectable-treated specimens.
CONCLUSION: Augment-treated specimens had the highest fusion scores. Treatment with either of the Augment products significantly promoted interbody spine fusion compared with empty spacers and was equivalent to autograft-induced fusion. No adverse events were noted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22024900     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31823b01dc

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  11 in total

1.  Lumbar interbody fusion with porous biphasic calcium phosphate enhanced by recombinant bone morphogenetic protein-2/silk fibroin sustained-released microsphere: an experimental study on sheep model.

Authors:  Liang Chen; Hai-Long Liu; Yong Gu; Yu Feng; Hui-Lin Yang
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Human mesenchymal stem cells and biomaterials interaction: a promising synergy to improve spine fusion.

Authors:  G Barbanti Brodano; E Mazzoni; M Tognon; C Griffoni; M Manfrini
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  A new sheep model with automatized analysis of biomaterial-induced bone tissue regeneration.

Authors:  L M Atayde; P P Cortez; T Pereira; P A S Armada-da-Silva; A Afonso; M A Lopes; J D Santos; A C Maurício
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 4.  An analysis of spine fusion outcomes in sheep pre-clinical models.

Authors:  Emily M Lindley; Cameron Barton; Thomas Blount; Evalina L Burger; Christopher M J Cain; Howard B Seim; A Simon Turner; Vikas V Patel
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Effect of implantation of Augment(®) Bone Graft on serum concentrations of platelet-derived growth factors: a pharmacokinetic study.

Authors:  Luis A Solchaga; Timothy Daniels; Stephen Roach; William Beasley; Leo B Snel
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.859

6.  Delivery of platelet-derived growth factor as a chemotactic factor for mesenchymal stem cells by bone-mimetic electrospun scaffolds.

Authors:  Matthew C Phipps; Yuanyuan Xu; Susan L Bellis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Safety of recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor-BB in Augment(®) Bone Graft.

Authors:  Luis A Solchaga; Christopher K Hee; Stephen Roach; Leo B Snel
Journal:  J Tissue Eng       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 7.813

8.  Additive-manufactured Ti-6Al-4 V/Polyetheretherketone composite porous cage for Interbody fusion: bone growth and biocompatibility evaluation in a porcine model.

Authors:  Pei-I Tsai; Meng-Huang Wu; Yen-Yao Li; Tzu-Hung Lin; Jane S C Tsai; Hsin-I Huang; Hong-Jen Lai; Ming-Hsueh Lee; Chih-Yu Chen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Characterizing the host response to rhPDGF-BB in a rat spinal arthrodesis model.

Authors:  Jonathan T Yamaguchi; Joseph A Weiner; Silvia Minardi; Allison C Greene; David J Ellenbogen; Mitchell J Hallman; Vivek P Shah; Kevin M Weisz; Soyeon Jeong; Tejas Nandurkar; Chawon Yun; Wellington K Hsu; Erin L Hsu
Journal:  JOR Spine       Date:  2021-10-07

10.  A comparison of radiostereometric analysis and computed tomography for the assessment of lumbar spinal fusion in a sheep model.

Authors:  Ali Humadi; Brian J C Freeman; Rob J Moore; Stuart Callary; Klas Halldin; Vikram David; William Maclaurin; Paul Tauro; Mark Schoenwaelder
Journal:  Evid Based Spine Care J       Date:  2013-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.