Literature DB >> 22024538

Should we continue to consider obesity a relative contraindication for autologous microsurgical breast reconstruction?

Arash Momeni1, Michael A Ahdoot, Rebecca Y Kim, Eric Leroux, Deepa J Galaiya, Gordon K Lee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Obesity is not only a causative factor for premature mortality, it has also been demonstrated to be associated with an increased postoperative complication rate. As such, it has traditionally been considered a relative contraindication to autologous breast reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to assess whether this recommendation is justified.
METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted analyzing the effect of obesity on complication rate after microsurgical autologous breast reconstruction using abdominal tissue. Patients undergoing breast reconstruction between November 2006 and February 2011 were included. In contrast to prior studies, only patients meeting criteria to undergo bariatric surgery were included in the study, thus, representing a particularly high-risk subset of patients (Group 1: BMI greater 40 kg/m(2); Group 2: BMI greater 35 kg/m(2) with co-morbidities).
RESULTS: A total of 42 breast reconstructions were performed in 28 patients who met inclusion criteria. Surgical complications were seen in a total of 9 patients (p = 1.00). All complications were successfully managed conservatively and did not prolong hospitalization. No differences were seen among study groups with respect to donor-site (p = 0.57) and recipient-site complications (p = 1.00). Of note, no partial or total flap loss was seen in this study.
CONCLUSIONS: Obesity is associated with a relatively high risk of minor complications postoperatively. However, complications can typically be managed non-operatively and on an outpatient basis with fairly minimal patient morbidity. We believe that obesity should not be considered a relative contraindication to autologous microsurgical breast reconstruction. Patients should, however, be informed preoperatively about their higher risk of postoperative complications.
Copyright © 2011 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22024538     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2011.10.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg        ISSN: 1748-6815            Impact factor:   2.740


  10 in total

1.  Patient determinants as independent risk factors for postoperative complications of breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Andri Thorarinsson; Victoria Fröjd; Lars Kölby; Mattias Lidén; Anna Elander; Hans Mark
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-08

Review 2.  Developing a theoretical framework to illustrate associations among patient satisfaction, body image and quality of life for women undergoing breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Michelle Cororve Fingeret; Summer W Nipomnick; Melissa A Crosby; Gregory P Reece
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 12.111

3.  Obesity Should Not Prevent from TRAM Flap Breast Reconstruction in Developing Countries.

Authors:  Sadaf Alipour; Ramesh Omranipour; Rahim Akrami
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 0.656

4.  CASE REPORT Persistent Seromas in Abdominal Free Flap Donor Sites After Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction Surgery: Case Reports and Literature Review.

Authors:  Abtin Sadeghi; Charles Malata
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2013-06-03

Review 5.  Autologous Breast Reconstruction with Transverse Rectus Abdominis Musculocutaneous (TRAM) or Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) Flaps: An Analysis of the 100 Most Cited Articles.

Authors:  Aijia Cai; Jan Suckau; Andreas Arkudas; Justus P Beier; Arash Momeni; Raymund E Horch
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2019-05-12

6.  Esthetic Outcomes of ADM-Assisted Expander-Implant Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Khang T Nguyen; Lauren M Mioton; John T Smetona; Akhil K Seth; John Y Kim
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2012-12-19

Review 7.  Is obesity a predisposing factor for free flap failure and complications? Comparison between breast and nonbreast reconstruction: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jin Yong Shin; Si-Gyun Roh; Nae-Ho Lee; Kyung-Moo Yang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  Optimizing aesthetic outcomes for breast reconstruction in patients with significant macromastia or ptosis.

Authors:  Wojciech Dec
Journal:  JPRAS Open       Date:  2018-02-14

9.  Breast Reconstruction in Obese Patients: The Fat Grafted Latissimus versus Abdominal Free Tissue Transfer.

Authors:  Matthew D Novak; Jordan T Blough; Jasson T Abraham; Hope D Shin; Tai Yasuda; Donna Ayala; Andrew M Altman; Michel Saint-Cyr
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-03-20

10.  Identification of Independent Risk Factors for Skin Complications in a Multifactorial Logistic Regression Analysis of Simultaneous Immediate Autologous Breast Reconstruction and Skin Reduction Mastectomy in Large and Ptotic Breasts Using an Inferiorly Based Deepithelialized Dermal Breast Flap.

Authors:  Felix H Vollbach; Benjamin F Thomas; Hisham Fansa
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-02-23
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.