Literature DB >> 22023575

The length of adaptive walks is insensitive to starting fitness in Aspergillus nidulans.

Danna R Gifford1, Sijmen E Schoustra, Rees Kassen.   

Abstract

Adaptation involves the successive substitution of beneficial mutations by selection, a process known as an adaptive walk. Gradualist models of adaptation, which assume that all mutations are small relative to the distance to a fitness optimum, predict that adaptive walks should be longer when the founding genotype is less well adapted. More recent work modeling adaptation as a sequence of moves in phenotype or genotype space predicts, by contrast, much shorter adaptive walks irrespective of the fitness of the founding genotype. Here, we provide what is, to the best of our knowledge, the first direct test of these alternative models, measuring the length of adaptive walks in evolving lineages of fungus that differ initially in fitness. Contrary to the gradualist view, we show that the length of adaptive walks in the fungus Aspergillus nidulans is insensitive to starting fitness and involves just two mutations on average. This arises because poorly adapted populations tend to fix mutations of larger average effect than those of better-adapted populations. Our results suggest that the length of adaptive walks may be independent of the fitness of the founding genotype and, moreover, that poorly adapted populations can quickly adapt to novel environments.
© 2011 The Author(s). Evolution© 2011 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22023575     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01380.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  13 in total

1.  Adaptation in tunably rugged fitness landscapes: the rough Mount Fuji model.

Authors:  Johannes Neidhart; Ivan G Szendro; Joachim Krug
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  Factors influencing the effect size distribution of adaptive substitutions.

Authors:  Emily L Dittmar; Christopher G Oakley; Jeffrey K Conner; Billie A Gould; Douglas W Schemske
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Using Aspergillus nidulans to identify antifungal drug resistance mutations.

Authors:  Xiaoxiao He; Shengnan Li; Susan G W Kaminskyj
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2013-12-20

4.  Genetic signature of adaptive peak shift in threespine stickleback.

Authors:  Sean M Rogers; Patrick Tamkee; Brian Summers; Sarita Balabahadra; Melissa Marks; David M Kingsley; Dolph Schluter
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Properties of selected mutations and genotypic landscapes under Fisher's geometric model.

Authors:  François Blanquart; Guillaume Achaz; Thomas Bataillon; Olivier Tenaillon
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Cost of antibiotic resistance and the geometry of adaptation.

Authors:  Ana Sousa; Sara Magalhães; Isabel Gordo
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  Quantifying the adaptive potential of an antibiotic resistance enzyme.

Authors:  Martijn F Schenk; Ivan G Szendro; Joachim Krug; J Arjan G M de Visser
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  The rule of declining adaptability in microbial evolution experiments.

Authors:  Alejandro Couce; Olivier A Tenaillon
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 4.599

9.  Rates of fitness decline and rebound suggest pervasive epistasis.

Authors:  L Perfeito; A Sousa; T Bataillon; I Gordo
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 10.  Effects of new mutations on fitness: insights from models and data.

Authors:  Thomas Bataillon; Susan F Bailey
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 5.691

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.