Literature DB >> 22023516

Complex karyotype and translocation t(4;14) define patients with high-risk newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: results of CMG2002 trial.

Pavel Nemec1, Zuzana Zemanova, Petr Kuglik, Kyra Michalova, Jana Tajtlova, Petra Kaisarova, Alexandra Oltova, Hana Filkova, Milena Holzerova, Jana Balcarkova, Marie Jarosova, Jana Rabasova, Martina Hruba, Ivan Spicka, Evzen Gregora, Zdenek Adam, Vlastimil Scudla, Vladimir Maisnar, Miroslava Schutzova, Roman Hajek.   

Abstract

The prognostic impact of chromosomal abnormalities was evaluated by fluorescence in situ hybridization with cytoplasmic immunoglobulin light chain staining (cIg-FISH) and by classical metaphase cytogenetics in a cohort of 207 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who were treated with high-dose therapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation in the CMG2002 clinical trial. The incidence of chromosomal abnormalities detected by FISH was as follows: 52.7% for del(13)(q14), 6.5% for del(17)(p13), 18.6% for t(11;14)(q13;q32), 22.8% for t(4;14)(p16;q32) and 45.7% for gain(1)(q21). Metaphase cytogenetic analysis revealed a complex karyotype in 19.1% and hyperdiploidy in 21.7% of patients. The overall response rate was not influenced by the presence of any studied chromosomal abnormality. Patients with a complex karyotype, those with translocation t(4;14) and those with gain of the 1q21 locus had a shorter time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS). Other genomic changes such as translocation t(11;14) and del(13q) had less impact on TTP and OS. In multivariate analysis, complex karyotype, translocation t(4;14) and β(2)-microglobulin level > 2.5 mg/L were independent prognostic factors associated with poor overall survival. Their unfavorable prognostic impact was even more pronounced if they were present in combination. Patients with t(4;14) present together with a complex karyotype had the worst prognosis, with a median OS of only 13.2 months, whereas patients with a normal karyotype or karyotype with ≤ 2 chromosomal changes had the best outcome, with 3-year OS of 85.9%. In conclusion, complex karyotype, gain of 1q21 region and translocation t(4;14) are major prognostic factors associated with reduced survival of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma treated with autologous stem cell transplantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22023516     DOI: 10.3109/10428194.2011.634042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma        ISSN: 1026-8022


  19 in total

1.  Conventional Cytogenetics and Interphase Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Results in Multiple Myeloma: A Turkey Laboratory Analysis of 381 Cases.

Authors:  Cigdem Aydin; Turgay Ulas; Ceren Hangul; Orhan Kemal Yucel; Utku Iltar; Ozan Salim; Deniz Ekinci; Sibel Berker Karauzum
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 0.900

2.  Metaphase cytogenetics and plasma cell proliferation index for risk stratification in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Patrick W Mellors; Moritz Binder; Rhett P Ketterling; Patricia T Greipp; Linda B Baughn; Jess F Peterson; Dragan Jevremovic; Kathryn E Pearce; Francis K Buadi; Martha Q Lacy; Morie A Gertz; Angela Dispenzieri; Suzanne R Hayman; Prashant Kapoor; Wilson I Gonsalves; Yi L Hwa; Amie Fonder; Miriam Hobbs; Taxiarchis Kourelis; Rahma Warsame; John A Lust; Nelson Leung; Ronald S Go; Robert A Kyle; S Vincent Rajkumar; Shaji K Kumar
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-05-26

3.  Role of high-dose melphalan with autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma patients receiving botezomib-containing induction therapy.

Authors:  Bo-Hee Lee; Seung Hwan Shin; Chang-Ki Min; Ho-Young Yhim; Jae-Yong Kwak; Jeong-A Kim
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2013-04-20       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 4.  Risk Stratification in Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Melissa Gaik-Ming Ooi; Sanjay de Mel; Wee Joo Chng
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.952

5.  Circulating serum microRNAs as novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for multiple myeloma and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance.

Authors:  Lenka Kubiczkova; Fedor Kryukov; Ondrej Slaby; Elena Dementyeva; Jiri Jarkovsky; Jana Nekvindova; Lenka Radova; Henrieta Greslikova; Petr Kuglik; Eva Vetesnikova; Ludek Pour; Zdenek Adam; Sabina Sevcikova; Roman Hajek
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 6.  Interpretation of cytogenetic results in multiple myeloma for clinical practice.

Authors:  A M Rajan; S V Rajkumar
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 11.037

7.  Fibroblast growth factor signaling and inhibition in non-small cell lung cancer and their role in squamous cell tumors.

Authors:  Ravi Salgia
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 4.452

8.  Genome-wide screening of cytogenetic abnormalities in multiple myeloma patients using array-CGH technique: a Czech multicenter experience.

Authors:  Jan Smetana; Jan Frohlich; Romana Zaoralova; Vladimira Vallova; Henrieta Greslikova; Renata Kupska; Pavel Nemec; Aneta Mikulasova; Martina Almasi; Ludek Pour; Zdenek Adam; Viera Sandecka; Lenka Zahradová; Roman Hajek; Petr Kuglik
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Clinical implication of centrosome amplification and expression of centrosomal functional genes in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Elena Dementyeva; Fedor Kryukov; Lenka Kubiczkova; Pavel Nemec; Sabina Sevcikova; Ivana Ihnatova; Jiri Jarkovsky; Jiri Minarik; Zdena Stefanikova; Petr Kuglik; Roman Hajek
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2013-03-23       Impact factor: 5.531

10.  Circulating Serum MicroRNA-130a as a Novel Putative Marker of Extramedullary Myeloma.

Authors:  Lenka Besse; Lenka Sedlarikova; Fedor Kryukov; Jana Nekvindova; Lenka Radova; Ondrej Slaby; Petr Kuglik; Martina Almasi; Miroslav Penka; Marta Krejci; Zdenek Adam; Ludek Pour; Sabina Sevcikova; Roman Hajek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.