PURPOSE: A power wheelchair simulator can allow users to safely experience various driving tasks. For such training to be efficient, it is important that driving performance be equivalent to that in a real wheelchair. This study aimed at comparing driving performance in a real and in a simulated environment. METHOD: Two groups of healthy young adults performed different driving tasks, either in a real power wheelchair or in a simulator. Smoothness of joystick control as well as the time necessary to complete each task were recorded and compared between the two groups. Driving strategies were analysed from video recordings. The sense of presence, of really being in the virtual environment, was assessed through a questionnaire. RESULTS: Smoothness of joystick control was the same in the real and virtual groups. Task completion time was higher in the simulator for the more difficult tasks. Both groups showed similar strategies and difficulties. The simulator generated a good sense of presence, which is important for motivation. CONCLUSIONS: Performance was very similar for power wheelchair driving in the simulator or in real life. Thus, the simulator could potentially be used to complement training of individuals who require a power wheelchair and use a regular joystick. [Box: see text].
PURPOSE: A power wheelchair simulator can allow users to safely experience various driving tasks. For such training to be efficient, it is important that driving performance be equivalent to that in a real wheelchair. This study aimed at comparing driving performance in a real and in a simulated environment. METHOD: Two groups of healthy young adults performed different driving tasks, either in a real power wheelchair or in a simulator. Smoothness of joystick control as well as the time necessary to complete each task were recorded and compared between the two groups. Driving strategies were analysed from video recordings. The sense of presence, of really being in the virtual environment, was assessed through a questionnaire. RESULTS: Smoothness of joystick control was the same in the real and virtual groups. Task completion time was higher in the simulator for the more difficult tasks. Both groups showed similar strategies and difficulties. The simulator generated a good sense of presence, which is important for motivation. CONCLUSIONS: Performance was very similar for power wheelchair driving in the simulator or in real life. Thus, the simulator could potentially be used to complement training of individuals who require a power wheelchair and use a regular joystick. [Box: see text].
Authors: Caryne Torkia; Denise Reid; Nicol Korner-Bitensky; Dahlia Kairy; Paula W Rushton; Louise Demers; Philippe S Archambault Journal: Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol Date: 2014-03-18
Authors: Elias B Thorp; Farnaz Abdollahi; David Chen; Ali Farshchiansadegh; Mei-Hua Lee; Jessica P Pedersen; Camilla Pierella; Elliot J Roth; Ismael Seanez Gonzalez; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi Journal: IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng Date: 2015-06-01 Impact factor: 3.802
Authors: Ali Farshchiansadegh; Farnaz Abdollahi; David Chen; Jessica Pedersen; Camilla Pierella; Elliot J Roth; Ismael Seanez Gonzalez; Elias B Thorp; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi Journal: Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc Date: 2014
Authors: Kevin A Hernandez-Ossa; Eduardo H Montenegro-Couto; Berthil Longo; Alexandre Bissoli; Mariana M Sime; Hilton M Lessa; Ivan R Enriquez; Anselmo Frizera-Neto; Teodiano Bastos-Filho Journal: Sensors (Basel) Date: 2020-06-24 Impact factor: 3.576