Literature DB >> 22022921

Whichever way you choose to categorize, working memory helps you learn.

Stewart Craig1, Stephan Lewandowsky.   

Abstract

There has been growing interest in the relationship between the capacity of a person's working memory and their ability to learn to categorize stimuli. While there is evidence that working memory capacity (WMC) is related to the speed of category learning, it is unknown whether WMC predicts which strategies people use when there are multiple possible solutions to a categorization problem. To explore the relationship between WMC, category learning, and categorization strategy use, 173 participants completed two categorization tasks and a battery of WMC tasks. WMC predicted the speed of category learning, but it did not predict which strategies participants chose to perform categorization. Thus, WMC does not predict which categorization strategies people use but it predicts how well they will use the strategy they select.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22022921     DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2011.608854

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  14 in total

1.  Individual differences in learning talker categories: the role of working memory.

Authors:  Susannah V Levi
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 1.759

2.  Modelling individual difference in visual categorization.

Authors:  Jianhong Shen; Thomas J Palmeri
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2016-11-10

3.  When high working memory capacity is and is not beneficial for predicting nonlinear processes.

Authors:  Helen Fischer; Daniel V Holt
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-04

4.  When children forget to remember: Effects of reduced working memory availability on prospective memory performance.

Authors:  Lavinia Cheie; Colin MacLeod; Mircea Miclea; Laura Visu-Petra
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-05

5.  Category learning strategies in younger and older adults: Rule abstraction and memorization.

Authors:  Christopher N Wahlheim; Mark A McDaniel; Jeri L Little
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2016-03-07

Review 6.  Memory mechanisms supporting syntactic comprehension.

Authors:  David Caplan; Gloria Waters
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-04

7.  Individual differences in category learning: memorization versus rule abstraction.

Authors:  Jeri L Little; Mark A McDaniel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-02

8.  Individual differences in learning and transfer: stable tendencies for learning exemplars versus abstracting rules.

Authors:  Mark A McDaniel; Michael J Cahill; Mathew Robbins; Chelsea Wiener
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2013-06-10

9.  ¡Hola! Nice to Meet You: Language Mixing and Biographical Information Processing.

Authors:  Eneko Antón; Jon Andoni Duñabeitia
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-05-26

10.  A mixture approach to vagueness and ambiguity.

Authors:  Steven Verheyen; Gert Storms
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.