Matrix metalloproteinase 10 (MMP-10; stromelysin 2) is a member of a large family of structurally related matrix metalloproteinases, many of which have been implicated in tumor progression, invasion and metastasis. We recently identified Mmp10 as a gene that is highly induced in tumor-initiating lung bronchioalveolar stem cells (BASCs) upon activation of oncogenic Kras in a mouse model of lung adenocarcinoma. However, the potential role of Mmp10 in lung tumorigenesis has not been addressed. Here, we demonstrate that Mmp10 is overexpressed in lung tumors induced by either the smoke carcinogen urethane or oncogenic Kras. In addition, we report a significant reduction in lung tumor number and size after urethane exposure or genetic activation of oncogenic Kras in Mmp10 null (Mmp10(-/-)) mice. This inhibitory effect is reflected in a defect in the ability of Mmp10-deficient BASCs to expand and undergo transformation in response to urethane or oncogenic Kras in vivo and in vitro, demonstrating a role for Mmp10 in the tumor-initiating activity of Kras-transformed lung stem cells. To determine the potential relevance of MMP10 in human cancer we analyzed Mmp10 expression in publicly-available gene expression profiles of human cancers. Our analysis reveals that MMP10 is highly overexpressed in human lung tumors. Gene set enhancement analysis (GSEA) demonstrates that elevated MMP10 expression correlates with both cancer stem cell and tumor metastasis genomic signatures in human lung cancer. Finally, Mmp10 is elevated in many human tumor types suggesting a widespread role for Mmp10 in human malignancy. We conclude that Mmp10 plays an important role in lung tumor initiation via maintenance of a highly tumorigenic, cancer-initiating, stem-like cell population, and that Mmp10 expression is associated with stem-like, highly metastatic genotypes in human lung cancers. These results indicate that Mmp10 may represent a novel therapeutic approach to target lung cancer stem cells.
Matrix metalloproteinase 10 (MMP-10; stromelysin 2) is a member of a large family of structurally related matrix metalloproteinases, many of which have been implicated in tumor progression, invasion and metastasis. We recently identified Mmp10 as a gene that is highly induced in tumor-initiating lung bronchioalveolar stem cells (BASCs) upon activation of oncogenic Kras in a mouse model of lung adenocarcinoma. However, the potential role of Mmp10 in lung tumorigenesis has not been addressed. Here, we demonstrate that Mmp10 is overexpressed in lung tumors induced by either the smoke carcinogen urethane or oncogenic Kras. In addition, we report a significant reduction in lung tumor number and size after urethane exposure or genetic activation of oncogenic Kras in Mmp10 null (Mmp10(-/-)) mice. This inhibitory effect is reflected in a defect in the ability of Mmp10-deficient BASCs to expand and undergo transformation in response to urethane or oncogenic Kras in vivo and in vitro, demonstrating a role for Mmp10 in the tumor-initiating activity of Kras-transformed lung stem cells. To determine the potential relevance of MMP10 in humancancer we analyzed Mmp10 expression in publicly-available gene expression profiles of humancancers. Our analysis reveals that MMP10 is highly overexpressed in humanlung tumors. Gene set enhancement analysis (GSEA) demonstrates that elevated MMP10 expression correlates with both cancer stem cell and tumor metastasis genomic signatures in humanlung cancer. Finally, Mmp10 is elevated in many humantumor types suggesting a widespread role for Mmp10 in humanmalignancy. We conclude that Mmp10 plays an important role in lung tumor initiation via maintenance of a highly tumorigenic, cancer-initiating, stem-like cell population, and that Mmp10 expression is associated with stem-like, highly metastatic genotypes in humanlung cancers. These results indicate that Mmp10 may represent a novel therapeutic approach to target lung cancer stem cells.
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common cause of cancer death in the United States [1]. Despite advances in treatment, clinical outcome of lung cancerpatients remains poor. Therefore, there continues to be a need to identify underlying mechanisms of lung tumorigenesis that could lead to more effective means of prevention, diagnosis, prognosis and targeted therapies.Emerging evidence supports the existence of rare subpopulations of cancer cells with stem-like characteristics [2], [3], [4]. These cancer-initiating cells or cancer stem cells (CSCs) exhibit self-renewal, tumor-initiating activity, and the ability to support tumor maintenance and metastasis [2], [4], [5], [6]. Thus, CSCs appear to be critical targets for effective, potentially curative cancer treatment. Unfortunately, CSCs exhibit intrinsic resistance to chemotherapy [7], [8], underlining the need to identify new therapeutic targets to effectively eradicate CSCs. CSCs share molecular and genomic features with embryonic stem cells, and embryonic stem cell genomic signatures are enriched in highly tumorigenic cancer stem cells. Such CSCs have been described in leukemia [9], and solid tumors, including melanoma [10], breast [11], brain [12], [13], [14], prostate [15], head and neck [16], pancreatic [17], colon carcinomas [18], [19], and lung [20], [21].We recently demonstrated that Mmp10 is required for the transformed growth and invasion of humanNSCLC cells in vitro
[22]. However, the role of Mmp10 in lung tumorigenesis has not been addressed. Here, we use a combination of mouse carcinogenesis models and analysis of humantumors to demonstrate that Mmp10 plays a novel, unexpected role in Kras-mediated lung cancer initiation, lung cancer stem cell expansion, and metastasis. Our data indicate that Mmp10 is an attractive therapeutic target for CSCs.
Results
Mmp10 loss inhibits Kras-mediated lung tumorigenesis
In order to determine whether Mmp10 is involved in lung tumor formation, mice were treated with the smoke carcinogen urethane to induce lung adenocarcinoma tumors using well-established protocols [23]. Immunohistochemical analysis demonstrated that Mmp10 expression is elevated in urethane-induced tumors, particularly at areas of contact between the tumor and the surrounding stroma (
). These results are consistent with previous observations in humanNSCLC tumors [22], [24], [25]. Interestingly, when Mmp10
/ mice were exposed to urethane, these mice developed significantly fewer (
) and smaller (
) tumors, and exhibited a smaller total tumor burden (
) than non-transgenic (NTg) littermates. Analysis of tumor grade using the system described by Kelly-Spratt et al. [26] demonstrated that urethane-induced tumors from Ntg and Mmp10
/ mice showed a similar distribution of tumors along the hyperplasia-adenoma-carcinoma progression scheme (
). These data indicate that Mmp10 plays an important promotive role in urethane-induced lung tumorigenesis primarily at the tumor initiation stage.
Figure 1
Mmp10 plays a promotive role in urethane-induced lung tumorigenesis.
Mmp10 mice and Ntg littermates were injected with urethane and analyzed as described in . A) H & E and immunohistochemical staining for Mmp10 in urethane-induced lung tumors. Higher magnification image of Mmp10 immunostaining is shown in the inset. Quantitative analysis of tumor number B), tumor size C) and tumor burden D) in urethane-treated Ntg (n = 7) and Mmp10 (n = 12) mice. Mean +/−SEM; p<. 0.012 tumor number; p<0.019 tumor burden; p = 0.034 tumor size). E) Urethane-induced tumors from Ntg and Mmp10
/ mice were graded as hyperplasia, adenoma or adenocarcinoma using published criteria [26]. Results are presented as the percentage of total tumors of each grade. Statistical analysis using Mann-Whitney U test revealed no statistically significant difference in tumor grade between urethane-induced tumors in Ntg and Mmp10
/ mice (p = 0.39).
Mmp10 plays a promotive role in urethane-induced lung tumorigenesis.
Mmp10mice and Ntg littermates were injected with urethane and analyzed as described in . A) H & E and immunohistochemical staining for Mmp10 in urethane-induced lung tumors. Higher magnification image of Mmp10 immunostaining is shown in the inset. Quantitative analysis of tumor number B), tumor size C) and tumor burden D) in urethane-treated Ntg (n = 7) and Mmp10 (n = 12) mice. Mean +/−SEM; p<. 0.012 tumor number; p<0.019 tumor burden; p = 0.034 tumor size). E) Urethane-induced tumors from Ntg and Mmp10
/ mice were graded as hyperplasia, adenoma or adenocarcinoma using published criteria [26]. Results are presented as the percentage of total tumors of each grade. Statistical analysis using Mann-Whitney U test revealed no statistically significant difference in tumor grade between urethane-induced tumors in Ntg and Mmp10
/ mice (p = 0.39).Since urethane-induced lung tumorigenesis is thought to be driven, at least in part, through acquisition of Kras mutations, we assessed whether Mmp10 plays a similar promotive role in Kras-mediated lung tumorigenesis. For this purpose, we crossed Mmp10
/ mice to Krasmice, in which spontaneous recombination events lead to activation of a mutant Kras allele in the lung that drives lung tumor formation [27]. Lung tumors in Krasmice express elevated Mmp10 that exhibits a similar pattern of expression as in urethane-induced lung tumors (
). Similar to our observation in urethane-treated mice, bitransgenic Kras/Mmp10mice developed fewer (
) and smaller (
) tumors, and exhibit lower overall tumor burden (
) than Krasmice. Analysis of tumor grade using the scoring system devised by Jackson et al. [28] demonstrated that ∼16% of tumors in Krasmice were high grade adenocaricnomas (grade 3), whereas less than 1% of the tumors in Krasmice were grade 3 (
). These data suggest that Mmp10 in this model is important in both tumor initiation and progression. Taken, together our data indicate that Mmp10 plays an important role in multiple models of lung tumor formation.
Figure 2
Mmp10 is necessary for Kras-induced lung tumorigenesis in vivo.
A) Immunohistochemical staining of Kras lung tumor for mouse MMP10. Higher magnification image of Mmp10 immunostaining is shown in the inset. Quantitative analysis of B) tumor number, C) tumor size and D) tumor burden in Kras and Kras mice. Columns, mean; bars, SEM, n = 13, (*) denotes p = 0.04. E) Tumors from Kras and Kras mice were categorized as advanced adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH), or grade 1,2 or 3 adenomas using the published scoring criteria described by Jackson et al. [28]. Results are presented as the percentage of total tumors of each grade. Statistical analysis using Mann-Whitney U test revealed a significant decrease in higher grade tumors in Kras mice; *p<0.002.
Mmp10 is necessary for Kras-induced lung tumorigenesis in vivo.
A) Immunohistochemical staining of Kraslung tumor for mouseMMP10. Higher magnification image of Mmp10 immunostaining is shown in the inset. Quantitative analysis of B) tumor number, C) tumor size and D) tumor burden in Kras and Krasmice. Columns, mean; bars, SEM, n = 13, (*) denotes p = 0.04. E) Tumors from Kras and Krasmice were categorized as advanced adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH), or grade 1,2 or 3 adenomas using the published scoring criteria described by Jackson et al. [28]. Results are presented as the percentage of total tumors of each grade. Statistical analysis using Mann-Whitney U test revealed a significant decrease in higher grade tumors in Krasmice; *p<0.002.
Mmp10 is required for Kras-mediated bronchio-alveolar stem cell expansion in vivo
The fact that Mmp10-deficientmice develop fewer Kras-mediated lung tumors suggests that Mmp10 is involved in the initiating steps of Kras-mediated lung tumorigenesis in vivo. Initiation of Kras-mediated lung tumors is thought to involve clonal expansion of Kras-transformed bronchio-alveolar stem cells (BASCs), putative regional stem cells that reside at the terminal bronchioles adjacent to the alveolar space [29]. Therefore, we assessed whether Mmp10-deficiency affects the expansion of BASCs in response to urethane and oncogenic Kras in vivo. We identified and quantitated BASCs in paraffin sections of mouse lungs by dual immunofluorescence staining for surfactant protein C (SPC) and the Clara cell-specific protein (CCSP) as described previously [29], [30]. BASCs are observed at the bronchioalveolar duct junctions at terminal bronchioles as double SPC/CCSP positive cells (
). Either urethane treatment or the presence of oncogenic Kras caused an expansion of BASCs at the terminal bronchioles (
). Quantitative analysis of lung tissue sections from Ntg and Mmp10mice in the absence or presence of urethane showed that urethane-treated Ntgmice exhibit a significant increase in the number of BASC per terminal bronchiole (BASCs/TB) when compared with control Ntgmice (
). Urethane-treated Mmp10mice showed a highly significantly diminiution in BASC expansion, such that the distribution and number of BASCs was not significantly different from untreated Ntgmice (
). A similar inhibition of oncogenic BASC expansion was observed in Krasmice in vivo when compared to Krasmice (
). Therefore, in two independent models of Kras-mediated lung tumorigenesis, we observed that Mmp10 deficiency leads to significant decreases in lung tumor number, size and burden; and in each model, the inhibitory effect of Mmp10 deficiency on tumorigenesis was reflected in a defect in the oncogenic expansion of BASCs in vivo. Interestingly, Mmp10 deficiency does not appear to have an effect on BASC homeostasis per se since BASC number and distribution in Mmp10
/ mice is not significantly different from that of Ntgmice. Rather, Mmp10 appears to be important for oncogenic expansion of BASCs in response to urethane or Kras activation.
Figure 3
MMP10 is required for urethane- and Kras-induced BASC expansion in vivo.
A) Immunofluorescent analysis of CCSP (green) and SPC (red) dual positive BASCs (white arrows) in terminal bronchioles (TB) of control Ntg, and urethane-treated Ntg and Mmp10mice (), and from Ntg, Kras and Kras mice (). B) Quantitative analysis of BASCs in control Ntg, and urethane treated Ntg and Mmp10 mice. %TBs; bars +/−SEM, n = ≥30 TBs/genotype. p<0.0005 urethane treated NTg vs. Mmp10; p<0.0001 untreated Ntg vs. urethane-treated Ntg; No significant difference between untreated non-Ntg vs. urethane treated Mmp10 mice. C) Quantitative analysis of BASCs in lung TBs of Ntg, Kras and Kras mice. Columns, percentage of TBs; bars = /−SEM, n≥50 TBs/genotype; p<0.001 Ntg vs. Kras mice; p<0.003 Kras mice vs. Kras mice; no significant difference in BASC number or distribution was observed between Ntg and Kras (p = 0.76) or Mmp10
/ (p = 0.76) mice.
MMP10 is required for urethane- and Kras-induced BASC expansion in vivo.
A) Immunofluorescent analysis of CCSP (green) and SPC (red) dual positive BASCs (white arrows) in terminal bronchioles (TB) of control Ntg, and urethane-treated Ntg and Mmp10mice (), and from Ntg, Kras and Krasmice (). B) Quantitative analysis of BASCs in control Ntg, and urethane treated Ntg and Mmp10mice. %TBs; bars +/−SEM, n = ≥30 TBs/genotype. p<0.0005 urethane treated NTg vs. Mmp10; p<0.0001 untreated Ntg vs. urethane-treated Ntg; No significant difference between untreated non-Ntg vs. urethane treated Mmp10mice. C) Quantitative analysis of BASCs in lung TBs of Ntg, Kras and Krasmice. Columns, percentage of TBs; bars = /−SEM, n≥50 TBs/genotype; p<0.001 Ntg vs. Krasmice; p<0.003 Krasmice vs. Krasmice; no significant difference in BASC number or distribution was observed between Ntg and Kras (p = 0.76) or Mmp10
/ (p = 0.76) mice.
Mmp10 is required for Kras-mediated BASC transformation in vitro
Given the importance of BASCs in tumor initiation, and the inhibitory effect of Mmp10 loss on Kras-mediated BASC expansion in vivo, we assessed the role of Mmp10 in Kras-mediated BASC expansion and transformation in vitro. For this purpose, we utilized LSL-Krasmice, a model in which a conditional lox-stop-lox (LSL) Kras allele can be activated by Cre-mediated recombination [31]. BASCs were isolated from Ntg, LSL-Kras, and LSL-Kras/Mmp-10mice and characterized for enrichment of BASCs using dual immunofluorescence and flow cytometry. Our BASC preparations consisted of >86% SPC/CCSP double positive cells when analyzed by flow cytometry confirming isolation of a highly enriched BASC population (
). Treatment of BASCs from LSL-Krasmice with adenovirus expressing Cre-recombinase (AdCre) to activate the oncogenic Kras allele led to a significant increase in Mmp10 mRNA abundance, whereas AdCre-treated BASCs from LSL-Kras/Mmp10mice expressed no detectable Mmp10 mRNA as expected (
). These results confirm our previous finding that Mmp10 expression is induced in BASCs after expression of oncogenic Kras
[30]. AdCre treated BASCs from Ntg or Mmp10mice form small, highly organized spherical colonies when plated in three dimensional Matrigel culture of similar size and number (
). In contrast, AdCre treated BASCs from LSL-Krasmice grow as larger amorphic, disorganized colonies characteristic of Kras-mediated transformation (
, middle panel;
[30]). AdCre treated BASCs from LSL-Kras/Mmp10mice form colonies similar in size, number and morphology to those from Ntg and Mmp10
/ mice (
). Quantitative analysis confirmed that BASC colonies from LSL-Krasmice are of larger diameter than colonies from Ntg, Mmp10
/ or LSL-Kras/ Mmp10 BASCs (
). Thus, Mmp10 is required for oncogenic Kras-induced morphological transformation and expansion of BASCs in vitro but has no appreciable effect on the maintenance of non-transformed BASCs in culture.
Figure 4
Mmp10 is required for Kras-induced expansion and transformation of BASCs in vitro.
BASCs isolated from Ntg, Mmp10, LSL-Kras, and LSL-Kras/Mmp10 mice were treated with AdCre and plated in three-dimensional Matrigel culture as described in Experimental Procedures. A) Flow cytometry of isolated BASCs for SPC and CCSP B) QPCR for Mmp10 in BASCs from Ntg, LSL-Kras, and LSL-Kras/Mmp10 mice. Fold of Ntg +/−SEM. n = 3, *p<0.000008. C) Morphology of BASC colonies from Ntg, Mmp10,LSL-Kras, and LSL-Kras/Mmp10 mice. D) Analysis of BASC colony size. %Ntg +/−SEM. n = 85 Ntg, 56 Mmp10,30 (LSL-Kras) and 80 (LSL-Kras/Mmp10). *p<0.00001 Ntg vs, LSL-Kras; **p<0.00001 LSL-Kras vs. LSL-Kras/Mmp10.
Mmp10 is required for Kras-induced expansion and transformation of BASCs in vitro.
BASCs isolated from Ntg, Mmp10, LSL-Kras, and LSL-Kras/Mmp10mice were treated with AdCre and plated in three-dimensional Matrigel culture as described in Experimental Procedures. A) Flow cytometry of isolated BASCs for SPC and CCSP B) QPCR for Mmp10 in BASCs from Ntg, LSL-Kras, and LSL-Kras/Mmp10mice. Fold of Ntg +/−SEM. n = 3, *p<0.000008. C) Morphology of BASC colonies from Ntg, Mmp10,LSL-Kras, and LSL-Kras/Mmp10mice. D) Analysis of BASC colony size. %Ntg +/−SEM. n = 85 Ntg, 56 Mmp10,30 (LSL-Kras) and 80 (LSL-Kras/Mmp10). *p<0.00001 Ntg vs, LSL-Kras; **p<0.00001 LSL-Kras vs. LSL-Kras/Mmp10.
Mmp10 expression is associated with stem cell signatures and metastasis in human lung cancer
We previously demonstrated that Mmp10 is overexpressed in humanNSCLC and is important for transformed growth and invasion of humanNSCLC cells in vitro
[22]. Given the unexpected role of Mmp10 in expansion of Kras-transformed mouse lung BASC and tumor initiating activity, we computationally explored the relationship between Mmp10 expression, cancer stem cell expression profiles and metastasis in humanlung cancers. For this purpose, we divided a publicly-available dataset consisting of genome-wide expression analysis of humanlung adenocarcinomas (GSE11969) into two equal sized groups of 30 samples comprised of the tumors with the highest (High) and lowest (Low) Mmp10 RNA expression, respectively. Statistical analysis confirmed these two groups of samples express significantly different levels of Mmp10 mRNA (
). We then performed gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) against gene sets available as part of the Molecular Signatures Database (MSig) Version 3.0 as described in to measure any association between Mmp10 and cancer stem cell gene expression profiles. Gene sets were identified by searching the MSig database for gene signatures containing the terms “cancer” and “stem” within their descriptions. GSEA revealed that 37 of the 50 (74%) cancer stem cell signatures were enriched in the high Mmp10 samples, and that 14 signatures were significantly enriched with a p-value <0.05 and FDR <25% (
). Interestingly, only 1/50 stem cell signature was enriched in the low Mmp10 samples. This signature described genes that are downregulated in glioma stem cells, [32], further supporting the association of high Mmp10 with the cancer stem cell genotype. A separate GSEA using an independent lung adenocarcinoma gene expression data set (GSE13213) validated our initial analysis. 44/50 stem cell signatures were enriched in high Mmp10tumor samples and none were enriched in the low Mmp10tumor samples from this second data set. 10 stem cell gene sets were significantly enriched with a p-value <0.05 (
), of which seven were also significantly enriched in the first lung adenocarcinoma gene set. These data provide compelling evidence that high Mmp10 expression in humanNSCLC tumors is associated with a cancer stem-like gene expression profile.
Figure 5
Mmp10 expression correlates with cancer stem cell genotypes and metastasis in human lung tumors.
A) Gene expression data from primary human lung adenocarcinomas were divided into two groups of 30 samples consisting of lowest (Low) and highest (High) Mmp10 expressing lung tumors. n = 30; * p = 2.8×10−33. B) Mmp10 in normal lung versus lung tumors with () and without () bone metastases. n = 3, normals, n = 9, No Mets, n = 7, Met.; NS = not significant, *p = 0.008; **p = 0.04. C) Mmp10 mRNA expression in human tumors. Data are expressed as fold-change from matched normal.
Table 1
Cancer Stem Cell Signatures correlate with high Mmp10 expression in lung cancer.
Signature Name/Description
Size (genes)
ES
NES
P-value
FDR
Reference
Embryonic Stem Cell (ESC)-proliferation
111
0.44
2.11
<0.0001
0.003
[54]
ESC-Core signature
268
0.34
1.86
<0.0001
0.015
[55]
ESC-gene set 1
285
0.3
1.65
<0.0001
0.059
[54]
ESC-NOS targets
136
0.3
1.48
0.014
0.156
[54]
ESC-PRC2 targets
489
0.24
1.4
0.002
0.23
[54]
ESC-SUZ12 targets
765
0.23
1.38
<0.0001
0.23
[54]
ESC-Oct4 targets
228
0.25
1.35
0.023
0.21
[54]
ESC- EED targets
778
0.21
1.29
0.002
0.21
[54]
ESC-cycling genes
460
0.22
1.25
0.027
0.24
[54]
Breast cancer progenitor cells
266
0.24
1.32
0.021
0.22
[56]
ESC-H3K27 ME3
830
0.21
1.29
0.002
0.23
[54]
ESC-Myc-Max targets
653
0.21
1.24
0.015
0.23
[54]
ESC-Sox2 targets
509
0.21
1.22
0.018
0.22
[54]
ESC-Nanog targets
694
0.2
1.17
0.036
0.25
[54]
Table 2
Validation of the association between high Mmp10 in lung tumors and cancer stem cell signatures.
Gene Set
Size (genes)
ES
NES
p-value
Reference
ESC-Proliferation
143
0.5
2.14
<0.0001
[54]
Breast cancer progenitor cells UP
370
0.38
1.8
<0.0001
[56]
Breast cancer-tamoxiphen resistance
49
0.49
1.72
0.025
[57]
UV response cluster G4
13
0.65
1.72
0.044
[58]
ESC-ES geneset 1
370
0.33
1.56
0.004
[54]
Leukemic stem cells
234
0.34
1.53
0.007
[59]
ESC-EED Targets
1002
0.26
1.36
0.009
[54]
ESC-cycling genes
630
0.26
1.32
0.023
[54]
ESC-H3K27ME3
1058
0.24
1.25
0.018
[54]
ESC-SUZ12_Targets
979
0.24
1.25
0.037
[54]
Gene sets marked in bold text were also significantly enriched in the high Mmp10 lung tumor gene set analysis outlined in Figure 5 and Table 1.
Mmp10 expression correlates with cancer stem cell genotypes and metastasis in human lung tumors.
A) Gene expression data from primary humanlung adenocarcinomas were divided into two groups of 30 samples consisting of lowest (Low) and highest (High) Mmp10 expressing lung tumors. n = 30; * p = 2.8×10−33. B) Mmp10 in normal lung versus lung tumors with () and without () bone metastases. n = 3, normals, n = 9, No Mets, n = 7, Met.; NS = not significant, *p = 0.008; **p = 0.04. C) Mmp10 mRNA expression in humantumors. Data are expressed as fold-change from matched normal.Gene sets marked in bold text were also significantly enriched in the high Mmp10lung tumor gene set analysis outlined in Figure 5 and Table 1.We also performed an unbiased analysis using every gene set in the MSig database. In this analysis, the top stem cell signatures remained significantly enriched (data not shown).
shows the most highly significant gene signatures associated with high Mmp10. Significantly, 3 of the top 5 gene sets identified contain Mmp10 as part of the signature. The top scoring gene set describes a signature comprised of genes over-expressed in early stage head and neck tumors suggesting an involvement in early tumorigenesis [33]. Among the gene sets that significantly correlate with high Mmp10 expression, many related to tumor progression, poor clinical outcome and metastatic potential. To specifically explore the association between Mmp10 and lung tumor metastasis, we analyzed a third gene expression dataset from early stage humanlung adenocarcinoma samples that had produced a metastasis in bone tissue compared to samples that had not [34]. Analysis revealed that Mmp10 expression was significantly elevated in the primary tumors that produced metastases when compared to normal lung tissue but not in those that did not, indicating an association between Mmp10 expression and metastatic potential (
). Interestingly, GSEA of the metastatic lung cancer gene set demonstrated a highly significant correlation with 10 stem cell signatures (p-value <0.05 and FDR <25%), four of which were also among the most significant gene sets identified using GSEA of the high Mmp10lung adenocarcinomas (
). These latter results reveal an association between metastatic potential and stem-like characteristics in primary humanlung adenocarcinomas.
Table 3
The 10 most highly correlated signatures associated with high Mmp10 in lung cancer.
Gene Set Name
Size (genes)
ES
NES
p-value
FDR
Reference
Upregulated in early stage Head and Neck tumors vs. normal
43
0.75
2.65
<0.0001
<0.0001
[33]
Up regulated in colon adenomas vs. normal mucosa
128
0.6
2.51
<0.0001
0.001
[60]
Upregulated in breast cancer
19
0.85
2.41
<0.0001
0.009
[61]
Up regulated in basal mammary epithelial cells vs. luminal
53
0.67
2.4
<0.0001
0.007
[62]
Upregulated in cervical cancers and associated with proliferation and pooor outcome
140
0.56
2.38
<0.0001
0.011
[63]
Upregulated in NSCLC and predict poor survival
445
0.48
2.37
<0.0001
0.012
[64]
Up regulated in in advanced vs early gastric cancers
162
0.55
2.35
<0.0001
0.016
[65]
Up regulated in nasopharyngeal carcinoma vs. normal
272
0.5
2.31
<0.0001
0.026
[66]
Up regulated in invasive ductal breast carcinoma vs. carcinoma in situ
343
0.49
2.31
<0.0001
0.024
[67]
Up regulated in breast ductal carcinoma vs. normal
66
0.6
2.3
<0.0001
0.024
[68]
Gene sets marked in bold text contain Mmp10 as part of the gene signature.
Table 4
Association of metastatic lung cancer genes with cancer stem cell signatures.
Gene Set
Size (genes)
ES
NES
p-value
FDR
Reference
UV Response Cluster G4
14
0.67
1.86
0.005
0.015
[58]
Response to UV NHEK UP
146
0.41
1.82
<0.0001
0.012
[58]
UV Response Cluster G3
11
0.66
1.68
0.011
0.043
[58]
Silenced by Methylation in Colon Cancer
42
0.44
1.58
0.015
0.08
[69]
TP63 Gamma Targets
9
0.65
1.57
0.035
0.069
[70]
ESC-EED Targets
921
0.29
1.51
<0.0001
0.107
[54]
Cancer Progenitors
61
0.37
1.45
0.025
0.129
[54]
ESC-PRC2 Targets
566
0.28
1.44
<0.0001
0.124
[54]
ESC with H3K27ME3
991
0.27
1.44
<0.0001
0.111
[54]
ESC SUZ12 Targets
906
0.25
1.33
<0.0001
0.222
[54]
Gene sets marked in bold text are cancer stem cell signatures also identified as highly correlated with lung tumors expressing high Mmp10.
Gene sets marked in bold text contain Mmp10 as part of the gene signature.Gene sets marked in bold text are cancer stem cell signatures also identified as highly correlated with lung tumors expressing high Mmp10.Given the importance of elevated Mmp10 expression in humanlung cancer biology, we next assessed whether Mmp10 expression was also elevated in other forms of humancancer. Gene expression profiling revealed that Mmp10 is commonly overexpressed in many forms of humancancer, including lung, head and neck, esophageal, bladder, skin, colorectal, breast, cervical, nasopharyngeal, tongue and pancreatic cancers (
and
), suggesting a widespread role for Mmp10 in humanmalignancy.
Table 5
MMP10 is Overexpressed in many Human Cancer Types.
Tumor Type/Data set
Description
Tumor N
Control N
MMP10 T/N
p-value
Reference
Esophageal Cancer
Esophageal Tumor vs. matched normal
13
13
4.56
0.0158
[71]
Breast Cancer
Infiltrating ductal mammary carcinoma vs. normal
68
61
5.79
1.4E-15
[72]
Bladder Cancer
Muscle Invasive Carcinoma vs. normal
13
9
4.54
0.0015
[73]
Bladder Cancer
Primary Resected Bladder Tumor vs. normal
165
10
1.59
0.0006
[74]
*Skin Cancer
Squamous cell carcinoma vs. normal
11
4
36
4.1E-07
[75]
*Skin Cancer
Basal cell carcinoma vs. normal
15
4
24.7
4E-06
[75]
Colorectal Cancer
Colon biopsies from colorectal carcinoma patients
15
8
5.7
0.0008
[76]
Colorectal Cancer
Colorectal Adenoma vs. normal
32
32
5.2
5.4E-10
[60]
Lung Cancer
Squamous cell carcinoma vs. normal
16
7
7.59
0.0002
[77]
Lung Cancer
Adenocarcinoma vs. normal
7
2
2.64
0.034
[77]
Cervical Cancer
HPV-positive cervical cancer vs. normal
20
8
7.09
8.4E-05
[78]
Colorectal Cancer
metastatic-versus non-metastatic
77
N/A
2.29
0.04
[79]
Skin Cancer
Melanoma vs. normal
14
4
5.9
0.0002
[80]
NSCLC
stage T2 vs T1
41
15
24.2
0.007
[80]
NSCLC
stage T4 vs T1
14
4
30.4
0.005
[80]
NSCLC
N2 vs N0
9
13
7.38
0.027
[80]
NSCLC
M1 vs M0
17
24
4.4
0.025
[80]
Nasopharyngeal Cancer
Nasopharyngeal Cancer biopsies vs. normal
25
3
4.41
2.10E-07
[81]
SCC of tongue
SCC tongue vs. normal
26
12
6.33
1.30E-06
[82]
esophageal SCC
vs matched normal
53
53
4.57
9.00E-10
[83]
NSCLC
squamous cell (18) vs. adenocarcinoma (40)
18
40
7.06
1.00E-04
[84]
Pancreatic cancer
PDAC vs matched normal
36
36
3.01
9.70E-05
[85]
Discussion
Increasing evidence suggests that many cancers, including lung cancer, possess a small subpopulation of cells that exhibit hallmark traits of stem cells. These “cancer stem cells” are thought to be responsible for the initiation, maintenance, progression and metastatic spread of tumors. Most current treatment modalities for lung cancer ultimately fail, perhaps due to intrinsic resistance of CSCs to therapy, resulting in disease recurrence and decreased patient survival. Therefore, molecular characterization of the mechanisms that govern the survival and growth of CSCs may hold a vital key to developing more effective therapeutic strategies that will improve the clinical outcome of patients with lung cancer.The matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) have long been implicated in tumor progression and metastasis. We recently demonstrated that Mmp10 is overexpressed in NSCLC and is a critical target of oncogenic Kras required for transformed growth and invasion of humanNSCLC cells in vitro
[22]. Our current study provides compelling evidence that Mmp10 exerts its pro-tumorigenic effects, at least in part, by maintaining a population of CSCs that drive tumor initiation and metastasis. Not only is Mmp10 elevated in tumors developed in two different mouse models of Kras-induced lung adenocarcinoma, genetic knock out of Mmp10 leads to formation of significantly fewer tumors, suggesting an effect of Mmp10 on tumor initiation. Consistent with this conclusion, Mmp10 abundance is highly elevated in BASCs transformed with oncogenic Kras
[30], and genetic loss of Mmp10 leads to a failure of BASCs expressing oncogenic Kras to expand in vivo, and undergo morphological transformation in vitro. Though it is still unclear whether BASCs represent regional lung stem cells, strong circumstantial evidence indicates that they are involved in tumor initiation in the mouse lung. BASCs undergo expansion and transformation in response to Kras activation [29], and genetic and/or pharmacological disruption of multiple key oncogenic pathway genes involved in Kras-mediated tumorigenesis, including Prkci
[30], Pik3ca
[35], and Bmi1
[36], lead to inhibition of BASC expansion and Kras-mediated tumor formation in vivo. On the other hand, recent studies have demonstrated that both Sca1+ (including BASCs) and Sca1- cells exhibit tumor-initiating activity in Krasmice, demonstrating that BASCs are not the sole source of tumor-initiating cells in this model [37]. These findings indicate that tumor genotype is an important determinant of tumor-initiating cells. In humans, lung adenocarcinomas, which frequently harbor Kras mutations, often develop at the bronchio-alveolar duct junction and display either airway or alveolar differentiation, or both [38], suggesting that some of these tumors may have originated from BASC-like cells.Our data provide evidence that the role of Mmp10 in lung CSCs is cell autonomous. Both the Kras and urethanetumor models show Mmp10 staining in tumor cells, with little to no staining in tumor associated-stroma or morphological normal lung epithelium. More importantly, the tumor inhibitory effects of the genetic loss of Mmp10 are reflected in a defect in oncogenic expansion of BASCs in vivo and in vitro. Thus, while many MMPs produced by the tumor microenvironment play prominent roles in the invasive and metastatic properties of lung tumor cells, our data demonstrate that Mmp10 specifically functions to support the autonomous growth of CSCs. However, our data do not exclude a contributory role for Mmp10 produced by and/or exerting its effects upon the tumor microenvironment. However, our studies do provide new insight into a largely unappreciated role for Mmp10 in the regulation of CSC behavior. Interestingly, Mmps have been implicated in regulation of tumor cell growth through cleavage and activation of cell surface proteins involved in cell growth regulation such as Notch [39], [40], and through proteolytic liberation of active growth factors such as TGFβ, IGF and TNFα from latent extracellular stores [41]. Future studies will focus on determining the specific molecular mechanisms that contribute to Mmp10-mediated CSC proliferation.Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are defined by their ability to clonally expand, initiate tumors, maintain tumor progression and participate in tumor metastasis. The phenotype of these cells is associated with a genotype related to that of embryonic stem cells. Our finding that Mmp10 expression is associated with CSC genotypes in humanlung tumors provides compelling circumstantial evidence that Mmp10 plays a critical role in maintenance of CSCs within humanlung tumors. In this regard, it is interesting to note that Mmp10 expression has been observed to be elevated in tumor-initiating stem-like cells isolated from humansmall cell lung cancer cell lines [42], suggesting that Mmp10 may also function in the maintenance of these CSCs.The leading cause of cancer-related deaths in lung cancerpatients is metastatic dissemination. CSCs are thought to be the cells within a tumor that have the capability of metastasizing to distant sites. Our finding that Mmp10 is highly expressed in lung cancer-initiating BASCs, and is associated with the CSC genotype in humanlung tumors suggests that Mmp10 may promote both CSC maintenance and metastatic potential through its role in CSC proliferation and metastatic behavior. Our finding that Mmp10 is elevated in human CSCs and that Mmp10 is highly expressed at the interface between mouselung tumors and the surrounding tissue, suggesting a role for Mmp10 in tumor invasion, and are consistent with our previous funding that Mmp10 is required for invasion of humanNSCLC cells in vitro
[22]. These areas of increased Mmp10 staining may represent resident CSCs. The fact that Mmp10 is more highly expressed in tumors with high metastatic potential, and in the metastatic lesions of these tumors is consistent with the proposed role of CSC in metastatic spread. However, we cannot formally rule out an additional role for Mmp10 in bulk tumor cells that contributes to the metastatic potential of tumors. Our expression profiling data of humantumors demonstrates a close functional link between CSC, Mmp10 expression and metastatic potential, suggesting that Mmp10 plays a similar role in humanlung adenocarcinoma CSC invasion and metastasis. Our results also demonstrate that MMP10 is highly expressed in many humantumor types, and is associated with poor outcome, metastatic potential and cancer stem cell signatures. These findings suggest a widespread role for Mmp10 in humanmalignancy and identify Mmp10 as a novel therapeutic target in cancer stem cells.
Materials and Methods
Mouse Urethane- and KrasLA2-mediated Lung Tumorigenesis Studies
Nullizygous Mmp10 (Mmp10) mice were obtained from the National Cancer Institute Mutant Mouse Regional Resource Center (MMRRC). The mice were generated on a mixed 129/C57BL/6J background and harbor a targeted disruption of exons 1–3 of the mouseMmp10 gene. The mice were bred onto a pure C57BL/6J background through 10 generations. Genotyping was conducted by PCR using primers recommended by MMRRC. Mmp10mice and non-transgenic littermates were injected intraperitoneally with urethane at 1 mg/kg body weight weekly for six weeks to induce lung tumors. Control mice were injected with saline. Mice were analyzed twelve weeks after the first injection for the presence of pulmonary lesions. Krasmice, generated as previously described [27], were mated with Mmp10mice to generate bitransgenic Krasmice. Kras and Krasmice were harvested at the time points indicated to assessed tumor number, tumor size, tumor burden and pathological classification by a board-certified pathologist (A.K.). Mmp10 and non-transgenic mice served as negative controls. All animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Mayo Clinic and were conducted under approved IACUC protocol# A30308. Mouse tissues were prepared for histology and immunohistochemistry as previously described [30], [43]. Sections were stained for Mmp10 (NBP1-03118; Novus Biologicals, Littleton, CO) and antigen visualized using the Envision Plus Dual Labeled Polymer Kit (DAKO). Images were analyzed using the ScanScope scanner and ImageScope software (Aperio Technologies, Vista, CA).
BASC detection, isolation and culture ex vivo
BASCs were quantified in formalin fixed, paraffin embedded mouse lung tissues as described previously [30], [35]. LSL-Krasmice [44] were crossed with Mmp10mice to generate bitransgenic LSL-Kras/Mmp10mice. Lung epithelial cells were isolated from Ntg, Mmp10, LSL-Kras, and LSL-Kras/Mmp10mice and BASC isolation, Cre-recombinase treatment and ex vivo culture were carried out as described previously [30]. Brightfield images of BASC colonies were captured on an Olympus IX71 inverted microscope. BASC colony size was assessed using Image-Pro Plus 6.3 (Media Cybernetics, Bethesda, MD). BASCs were recovered from Matrigel culture for QPCR analysis using BD cell recovery solution (BD Biosciences).
RNA isolation and quantitative PCR
Total RNA was extracted from BASC cells using the RNeasy Plus Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). QPCR reagents for mouseMmp10 mRNA were purchased from Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA). QPCR was carried out using an Applied Biosystems 7900 thermal cycler, and data was analyzed using the SDS 2.3 software package. Data were normalized to 18S RNA.
Flow cytometry
BASCs were incubated for 1 hour at 4°C with Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated CD133 (Millipore, Billerica, MA) and Alexa Fluor 647 conjugated Notch4 (Biolegend, San Diego, CA) antibodies or respective isotype controls. Cells were incubated for 1 hour at 4°C with CCSP (Upstate, Temecula, CA) and SPC (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) antibodies followed by a 30 minute incubation with Alexa Fluor 488- and Alexa Fluor 647 conjugated secondary antibodies (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California). Flow cytometry was performed on an Accuri C6 flow cytometer and analyzed using CFlow Plus software (Accuri Cytometers, Inc., Ann Arbor, MI).
Statistical analysis
Differences in the number and distribution of BASCs in the terminal bronchioles were assessed using the Cochrane-Armitage test using StatsDirect 2.6.1. Differences in tumor grade were assessed using the Mann-Whitney U test in Stats-Direct 2.6.1. The Student's t test and one-way ANOVA statistical analyses were done using SigmaStat 3.5. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Assessment of Mmp10 in primary human cancer datasets
The correlation between Mmp10 and various types of humancancer was determined using the NextBio data mining framework (www.nextbio.com) [45]. The degree of correlation calculated by NextBio was based on Mmp10 values for individual microarray studies of specific cancer types. Selected gene expression experiments were chosen for a more in depth analysis The Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) accession numbers for these studies were: GSE3292, GSE3292, GSE6631, GSE6059, GSE5364, GSE14999, GSE3167, GSE13507, GSE7553, GSE7553, GSE4183, GSE8671, GSE1987, GSE10799, GSE6791, GSE18105, GSE11117, GSE13597, GSE9844, GSE23400, GSE10939, and GSE15471. From these experiments, p-values and fold change measurements, provided by NextBio, were recorded.
Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) of Human Lung Cancer Data Sets
Three lung cancer gene expression datasets were analyzed to assess the relationships between Mmp10 levels, the cancer stem cell phenotype and metastasis in humancancer. The first two data sets (GSE11969 and GSE13213) are comprised of gene expression measurements from NSCLC tumors. [46], [47]. The third dataset (GSE10799) contained expression values from humanlung adenocarcinoma samples that had produced metastasis in bone tissue compared to samples that had not [34]. All three of the microarray datasets were downloaded from GEO into the “R statistical computing language” using the “GEOquery” package of the “Bioconductor” software suite [48], [49], [50]. Quantile normalization of the datasets was performed using the “preprocess core” module [49], [51]. GSE11969 and GSE13213 were sorted according to their Mmp10 expression values. Lung tumor samples in GSE11969 were segregated into two sets. The first set contained the 30 samples with the highest Mmp10 expression values and the second set the 30 samples with the lowest Mmp10 expression values. GSE13213 was treated in the same manner except samples were separated into groups of 35 instead of 30. The size of the groups was determined to maximize the statistical significance of differential Mmp10 expression in each group as determined by a Welch's t-test.Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) was carried out on all of the lung cancer gene expression datasets described above [52], [53]. For each dataset, GSEA's were performed using two groups of gene sets that were available as part of the Molecular Signatures Database (MSig) Version 3.0 (http://www.broadinstitute.org/gsea/msigdb/index.jsp) [53]. The first collection of gene sets was intended to measure each datasets' degree of enrichment for the cancer stem cell phenotype. This group of gene sets was selected by searching the MSig database for signatures that contained the terms “cancer” and “stem” within their descriptions. The second collection of gene sets contained every signature listed in the MSig database and was intended to explore the relationships among the datasets in an untargeted fashion. In all GSEA's, gene sets that produced nominal p-values of less than 0.05 and false discovery rates (FDRs) of less than 0.25 were considered to be significantly enriched in the tested dataset.
Authors: E Dehan; A Ben-Dor; W Liao; D Lipson; H Frimer; S Rienstein; D Simansky; M Krupsky; P Yaron; E Friedman; G Rechavi; M Perlman; A Aviram-Goldring; S Izraeli; M Bittner; Z Yakhini; N Kaminski Journal: Lung Cancer Date: 2007-01-25 Impact factor: 5.705
Authors: E L Jackson; N Willis; K Mercer; R T Bronson; D Crowley; R Montoya; T Jacks; D A Tuveson Journal: Genes Dev Date: 2001-12-15 Impact factor: 11.361
Authors: Erica L Jackson; Kenneth P Olive; David A Tuveson; Roderick Bronson; Denise Crowley; Michael Brown; Tyler Jacks Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2005-11-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Aravind Subramanian; Pablo Tamayo; Vamsi K Mootha; Sayan Mukherjee; Benjamin L Ebert; Michael A Gillette; Amanda Paulovich; Scott L Pomeroy; Todd R Golub; Eric S Lander; Jill P Mesirov Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-09-30 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Chenwei Li; David G Heidt; Piero Dalerba; Charles F Burant; Lanjing Zhang; Volkan Adsay; Max Wicha; Michael F Clarke; Diane M Simeone Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2007-02-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Dohun Pyeon; Michael A Newton; Paul F Lambert; Johan A den Boon; Srikumar Sengupta; Carmen J Marsit; Craig D Woodworth; Joseph P Connor; Thomas H Haugen; Elaine M Smith; Karl T Kelsey; Lubomir P Turek; Paul Ahlquist Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2007-05-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Verline Justilien; Roderick P Regala; I-Chu Tseng; Michael P Walsh; Jyotica Batra; Evette S Radisky; Nicole R Murray; Alan P Fields Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-04-24 Impact factor: 3.240