| Literature DB >> 22021784 |
Koichi Tamura1, Shozo Yokoyama, Junji Ieda, Katsunari Takifuji, Tsukasa Hotta, Kenji Matsuda, Yoshimasa Oku, Takashi Watanabe, Toru Nasu, Shigehisa Kiriyama, Naoyuki Yamamoto, Yasushi Nakamura, John E Shively, Hiroki Yamaue.
Abstract
Objective Tumour budding formed by histologically undifferentiated cancer cells beyond the border of the tumour margin is associated with lymph node metastasis. However, hollow tumour nests, a possible histologically advanced phenotype of tumour budding, have not been discussed. We examined whether hollow spheroids exist beyond the border of the invasive margin and are associated with metastasis and prognosis. Moreover, we suggest that carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 1 (CEACAM1) isoform balance is associated with hollow spheroid formation. Methods Immunohistochemical analyses with CEACAM1 and M30 as an apoptosis marker were performed to examine the importance of hollow spheroid CEACAM1 expression and central cell apoptosis in hollow spheroid formation. The correlations between the presence of hollow spheroids beyond the invasive margin and the clinicopathological characteristics of 314 patients with colorectal cancer were retrospectively evaluated. A 3D culture with colorectal cancer cells transfected with CEACAM1 cDNA or shRNA was used to determine whether CEACAM1 isoform balance controls colorectal hollow spheroid formation. Results Hollow spheroid formation accompanying central cell apoptosis was confirmed by M30 staining and serial section with CEACAM1 staining. Of the 314 patients, 96 (30.4%) were classified as having hollow spheroids. The presence of hollow spheroids is an independent risk factor for metastases and shorter survival. In 3D culture, CEACAM1 isoform balance modulated hollow spheroid formation of colorectal cancer cells. Conclusions Hollow spheroid formation beyond the border of the tumour margin in colorectal cancer is more important than tumour budding for the prediction of malignant potential.Entities:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22021784 PMCID: PMC3191579 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000179
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ Open ISSN: 2044-6055 Impact factor: 2.692
Figure 1Immunohistochemical staining of hollow spheroids in colorectal cancer tissue. (A) Hollow spheroid, (arrows) beyond the invasive margin expressed CEACAM1 in the luminal surface (29H2) (original magnification, ×100). (B) The luminal surface and centre of the lumen were stained with CEACAM1 (left upper, CEACAM1 (29H2); original magnification, ×400), CEACAM1-L (right upper, CEACAM1-L specific antibodies; original magnification, ×400), CEACAM1-S (left lower, CEACAM1-S specific antibodies, staining of endothelial cells and neutrophils were used as an internal positive control; original magnification, ×400) and M30 cytoDEATH (right lower; original magnification, ×400). (C) Serial sections (i, ii, iii, iv, v, vi) from top (i) to bottom (vi) of a hollow spheroid stained with CEACAM1 (29H2). The lumen was a part of the hollow spheroid and was not a tube structure (original magnification, ×400).
Univariate analyses of lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis
| Lymph node metastasis | Distant metastasis | |||||
| Present | Absent | p Value | Present | Absent | p Value | |
| Age | 0.017 | 0.475 | ||||
| >65 | 71 | 74 | 30 | 139 | ||
| <65 | 60 | 109 | 31 | 114 | ||
| Gender | 0.104 | 0.389 | ||||
| Male | 70 | 115 | 39 | 146 | ||
| Female | 61 | 68 | 22 | 107 | ||
| Tumour site | 0.564 | 0.084 | ||||
| Colon | 72 | 107 | 41 | 138 | ||
| Rectum | 59 | 76 | 20 | 115 | ||
| Histological type | 0.172 | 0.832 | ||||
| Moderate/well | 125 | 180 | 60 | 245 | ||
| Others | 6 | 3 | 1 | 8 | ||
| Depth | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||||
| T3, 4 | 121 | 138 | 61 | 198 | ||
| T1, 2 | 10 | 45 | 0 | 55 | ||
| Lymphatic permeation | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||||
| Present | 116 | 96 | 56 | 156 | ||
| Absent | 15 | 87 | 5 | 97 | ||
| Venous permeation | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||||
| Present | 106 | 105 | 55 | 156 | ||
| Absent | 25 | 78 | 6 | 97 | ||
| Budding | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||||
| Present | 78 | 53 | 46 | 85 | ||
| Absent | 53 | 130 | 15 | 168 | ||
| Hollow spheroids | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||||
| Present | 72 | 24 | 45 | 51 | ||
| Absent | 59 | 159 | 16 | 202 | ||
Moderate: moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma; well: well differentiated adenocarcinoma.
Others: poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma and mucinous adenocarcinoma.
Multivariate analyses of lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis
| Variable | No. of patients | OR (95% CI) | p Value |
| Lymph node metastasis | |||
| Lymphatic permeation | 212 | 4.170 (2.032 to 8.558) | 0.001 |
| Hollow spheroid | 96 | 5.407 (2.948 to 9.916) | <0.001 |
| Distant metastasis | |||
| Budding | 131 | 2.840 (1.381 to 5.837) | 0.005 |
| Hollow spheroid | 96 | 6.334 (3.163 to 12.683) | <0.001 |
Univariate and multivariate analyses of survival
| Variable | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||
| HR (95% CI) | p Value | HR (95% CI) | p Value | |
| Age (<65) | 1.228 (0.785 to 1.919) | 0.368 | ||
| Gender (male) | 0.974 (0.618 to 1.536) | 0.911 | ||
| Histologic type (others | 1.522 (0.480 to 4.828) | 0.476 | ||
| Depth (T3, T4) | 9.309 (2.285 to 37.920) | 0.002 | 3.416 (0.793 to 14.727) | 0.099 |
| Lymphatic permeation | 3.307 (1.746 to 6.262) | 0.001 | 1.024 (0.498 to 2.106) | 0.948 |
| Venous permeation | 2.200 (1.252 to 3.868) | 0.006 | 0.954 (0.529 to 1.721) | 0.876 |
| Lymph node metastasis | 4.323 (2.635 to 7.093) | <0.001 | 1.663 (0.951 to 2.909) | 0.075 |
| Distant metastasis | 9.126 (5.787 to 14.391) | <0.001 | 3.799 (2.251 to 6.413) | <0.001 |
| Budding | 3.562 (2.209 to 5.743) | <0.001 | 1.302 (0.760 to 2.230) | 0.336 |
| Hollow spheroid | 6.881 (4.240 to 11.166) | <0.001 | 2.849 (1.632 to 4.975) | 0.001 |
Others: poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma and mucinous adenocarcinoma.
Figure 2Kaplan–Meier plots of overall patient survival times. (A) The survival times of the hollow spheroid group and the non-hollow spheroid group were analysed. The 5-year survival of the hollow spheroid group was 44.8% compared to 88.9% for the non-hollow spheroid group (p<0.0001). (B) The survival times of the budding group and the non-budding group were analysed. The 5-year survival of the budding group was 60.3% compared to 86.3% for the non-budding group (p<0.0001).
Figure 3Morphological changes in colorectal cancer cells in 3D culture and time course of hollow spheroid formation. (A) CEACAM1-4L transfected HT29 cells (left upper); CEACAM1-4S transfected HT29 cells (right upper); vector control transfected LS174T cells (left lower); CEACAM1-4S transfected LS174T cells (right lower). (B) CEACAM1-4L and CEACAM1-4S transfected HT29 cells. (C) CEACAM1 shRNA transfected LS174T cells. (D) CEACAM1-4S transfected LS174T cells. Long: CEACAM1-4L transfected cells; Parent: parent cells; Short: CEACAM1-4S transfected cells; shRNA: CEACAM1 shRNA transfected cells; Vector: vector control transfected cells.