PURPOSE: To evaluate the prognostic relevance of CEACAM1 and sialyl Lewis X expression in adenocarcinomas of the lung. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Paraffin wax sections of 93 patients with adenocarcinomas of the lung who underwent surgery between 1990 and 1995 were immunohistochemically investigated using monoclonal anti-CEACAM1 and sialyl Lewis X antibodies. The clinical course of all patients was followed up for a minimum of 5 years. RESULTS: Sixty-one tumors were classified as CEACAM1-positive, and 32 were classified as CEACAM1-negative. Patients with CEACAM1-positive tumors had a significantly poorer overall (P =.00025) and relapse-free (P =.00029) survival than those with CEACAM1-negative tumors. Only three patients did not express the sialyl Lewis X glycotope, whereas 90 tumors (97%) were sialyl Lewis X-positive. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, next to tumor stage and sex, only the expression of CEACAM1 was a significant independent prognostic factor for survival. CONCLUSION: Expression of CEACAM1 was an independent prognostic factor in our patient population and can be used to stratify patients with adenocarcinomas of the lung into low-risk and high-risk groups. In contrast, the expression of sialyl Lewis X was of no prognostic relevance because it was expressed in 97% of all investigated tumors, and most likely has no influence on the function of CEACAM1 in this tumor entity.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the prognostic relevance of CEACAM1 and sialyl Lewis X expression in adenocarcinomas of the lung. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Paraffin wax sections of 93 patients with adenocarcinomas of the lung who underwent surgery between 1990 and 1995 were immunohistochemically investigated using monoclonal anti-CEACAM1 and sialyl Lewis X antibodies. The clinical course of all patients was followed up for a minimum of 5 years. RESULTS: Sixty-one tumors were classified as CEACAM1-positive, and 32 were classified as CEACAM1-negative. Patients with CEACAM1-positive tumors had a significantly poorer overall (P =.00025) and relapse-free (P =.00029) survival than those with CEACAM1-negative tumors. Only three patients did not express the sialyl Lewis X glycotope, whereas 90 tumors (97%) were sialyl Lewis X-positive. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, next to tumor stage and sex, only the expression of CEACAM1 was a significant independent prognostic factor for survival. CONCLUSION: Expression of CEACAM1 was an independent prognostic factor in our patient population and can be used to stratify patients with adenocarcinomas of the lung into low-risk and high-risk groups. In contrast, the expression of sialyl Lewis X was of no prognostic relevance because it was expressed in 97% of all investigated tumors, and most likely has no influence on the function of CEACAM1 in this tumor entity.
Authors: Alireza Ebrahimnejad; Thomas Streichert; Peter Nollau; Andrea K Horst; Christoph Wagener; Ana-Maria Bamberger; Jens Brümmer Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Ruben Pio; David Blanco; Maria Jose Pajares; Elena Aibar; Olga Durany; Teresa Ezponda; Jackeline Agorreta; Javier Gomez-Roman; Miguel Angel Anton; Angel Rubio; Maria D Lozano; Jose M López-Picazo; Francesc Subirada; Tamara Maes; Luis M Montuenga Journal: BMC Genomics Date: 2010-06-03 Impact factor: 3.969