Literature DB >> 22021461

Occupational mobility and carotid artery intima-media thickness: findings from the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Study.

Denise Janicki-Deverts1, Sheldon Cohen, Karen A Matthews, David R Jacobs, Nancy E Adler.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether a 10-year change in occupational standing is related to carotid artery intima-media thickness (IMT) 5 years later.
METHODS: Data were obtained from 2350 participants in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study. Occupational standing was measured at the Year 5 and 15 CARDIA follow-up examinations when participants were 30.2 (standard deviation = 3.6) and 40.2 (standard deviation = 3.6) years of age, respectively. IMT (common carotid artery [CCA], internal carotid artery [ICA], and bulb) was measured at Year 20. Occupational mobility was defined as the change in occupational standing between Years 5 and 15 using two semicontinuous variables. Analyses controlled for demographics, CARDIA center, employment status, parents' medical history, own medical history, Year 5 Framingham Risk Score, physiological risk factors and health behaviors averaged across the follow-up, and sonography reader.
RESULTS: Occupational mobility was unrelated to IMT save for an unexpected association of downward mobility with less CCA-IMT (β = -0.04, p = .04). However, associations differed depending on initial standing (Year 5) and sex. For those with lower initial standings, upward mobility was associated with less CCA-IMT (β = -0.07, p = .003), and downward mobility was associated with greater CCA-IMT and bulb-ICA-IMT (β = 0.14, p = .01 and β = 0.14, p = .03, respectively); for those with higher standings, upward mobility was associated with greater CCA-IMT (β = 0.15, p = .008), but downward mobility was unrelated to either IMT measure (p values > .20). Sex-specific analyses revealed associations of upward mobility with less CCA-IMT and bulb-ICA-IMT among men only (p values < .02).
CONCLUSIONS: Occupational mobility may have implications for future cardiovascular health. Effects may differ depending on initial occupational standing and sex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22021461      PMCID: PMC3216404          DOI: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e3182365539

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychosom Med        ISSN: 0033-3174            Impact factor:   4.312


  34 in total

1.  Exhaustion, psychological stressors in the work environment, and acute myocardial infarction in adult men.

Authors:  P R Falger; E G Schouten
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.006

2.  Intragenerational mobility and mortality in Oslo: social selection versus social causation.

Authors:  Bjorgulf Claussen; Jeroen Smits; Oyvind Naess; George Davey Smith
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  An updated coronary risk profile. A statement for health professionals.

Authors:  K M Anderson; P W Wilson; P M Odell; W B Kannel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Social mobility and 21 year mortality in a cohort of Scottish men.

Authors:  C L Hart; G D Smith; D Blane
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Socioeconomic status and progression of carotid atherosclerosis. Prospective evidence from the Kuopio Ischemic Heart Disease Risk Factor Study.

Authors:  J Lynch; G A Kaplan; R Salonen; J T Salonen
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 8.311

Review 6.  Stress and the individual. Mechanisms leading to disease.

Authors:  B S McEwen; E Stellar
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1993-09-27

Review 7.  Socioeconomic status and health. The challenge of the gradient.

Authors:  N E Adler; T Boyce; M A Chesney; S Cohen; S Folkman; R L Kahn; S L Syme
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1994-01

Review 8.  Socioeconomic factors and cardiovascular disease: a review of the literature.

Authors:  G A Kaplan; J E Keil
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  CARDIA: study design, recruitment, and some characteristics of the examined subjects.

Authors:  G D Friedman; G R Cutter; R P Donahue; G H Hughes; S B Hulley; D R Jacobs; K Liu; P J Savage
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 6.437

10.  Relationship of cardiovascular risk factors to echocardiographic left ventricular mass in healthy young black and white adult men and women. The CARDIA study. Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults.

Authors:  J M Gardin; L E Wagenknecht; H Anton-Culver; J Flack; S Gidding; T Kurosaki; N D Wong; T A Manolio
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-08-01       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Occupational Mobility and Chronic Health Conditions in Middle and Later Life: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Rong Fu; Kathleen Abrahamson; Tara Campbell
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2022-10-14

2.  Low socioeconomic status over 12 years and subclinical cardiovascular disease: the study of women's health across the nation.

Authors:  Rebecca C Thurston; Samar R El Khoudary; Carol A Derby; Emma Barinas-Mitchell; Tené T Lewis; Candace K McClure; Karen A Matthews
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Early Life Family Conflict, Social Interactions, and Carotid Artery Intima-Media Thickness in Adulthood.

Authors:  Neha A John-Henderson; Thomas W Kamarck; Matthew F Muldoon; Stephen B Manuck
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.312

4.  Statistical challenges in modelling the health consequences of social mobility: the need for diagonal reference models.

Authors:  Jeroen van der Waal; Stijn Daenekindt; Willem de Koster
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 3.380

Review 5.  Early Diagnosis of Cardiovascular Diseases in Workers: Role of Standard and Advanced Echocardiography.

Authors:  Lidia Capotosto; Francesco Massoni; Simone De Sio; Serafino Ricci; Antonio Vitarelli
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 3.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.