Literature DB >> 22021395

Focus groups in health research: exploring the meanings of health and illness.

S Wilkinson1.   

Abstract

Focus group method is becoming increasingly popular among qualitative researchers. After introducing focus group method and briefly overviewing its use in health research, this article shows that the distinctive (and under-used) feature of focus group method is its generation of interactive data. Illustrating my argument with examples from health- related focus group research (including my own data on breast cancer), I argue that this feature makes focus groups an ideal method for gaining access to research participants' own meanings. Interactive data result in enhanced disclosure, improved access to participants' own language and concepts, better understanding of participants' own agendas, the production of more elaborated accounts, and the opportunity to observe the co-construction of meaning in action. Focus groups are, then, an ideal method for exploring people's own meanings and understandings of health and illness.

Entities:  

Year:  1998        PMID: 22021395     DOI: 10.1177/135910539800300304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Psychol        ISSN: 1359-1053


  51 in total

1.  Views of laypersons on the role employers play in return to work when sick-listed.

Authors:  Cecilia Nordqvist; Christina Holmqvist; Kristina Alexanderson
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2003-03

2.  Policy issues and stakeholder concerns regarding the storage and use of residual newborn dried blood samples for research.

Authors:  Erin Rothwell; Rebecca Anderson; Jeffrey Botkin
Journal:  Policy Polit Nurs Pract       Date:  2010-05-10

3.  Shame-inducing encounters. Negative emotional aspects of sickness-absentees' interactions with rehabilitation professionals.

Authors:  Tommy Svensson; Agneta Karlsson; Kristina Alexanderson; Cecilia Nordqvist
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2003-09

4.  Development and testing of interview questions to determine last menstrual period in Mexican immigrant populations.

Authors:  Natalia Deeb-Sossa; Robert P Agans; Betzabe C Butron-Riveros; Hector Balcazar; William D Kalsbeek; Pierre Buekens
Journal:  J Immigr Health       Date:  2004-07

5.  Findings from focus groups indicating what Chinese American immigrant women think about breast cancer and breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Frances Lee-Lin; Usha Menon; Lillian Nail; Kristin F Lutz
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2012-04-26

6.  Development of a tethered personal health record framework for early end-of-life discussions.

Authors:  Seuli Bose-Brill; Matthew Kretovics; Taylor Ballenger; Gabriella Modan; Albert Lai; Lindsay Belanger; Stephen Koesters; Taylor Pressler-Vydra; Celia Wills
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.229

7.  Development of the Barkin Index of Maternal Functioning.

Authors:  Jennifer L Barkin; Katherine L Wisner; Joyce T Bromberger; Scott R Beach; Martha A Terry; Stephen R Wisniewski
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 2.681

8.  Mexican American women's perspectives on a culturally adapted cognitive-behavioral therapy guided self-help program for binge eating.

Authors:  Munyi Shea; Fary M Cachelin; Guadalupe Gutierrez; Sherry Wang; Phoutdavone Phimphasone
Journal:  Psychol Serv       Date:  2015-10-12

Review 9.  Focus Group in Community Mental Health Research: Need for Adaption.

Authors:  Vesna Zupančič; Majda Pahor; Tina Kogovšek
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2018-04-27

10.  Ministers' perceptions of church-based programs to provide depression care for African Americans.

Authors:  Sidney H Hankerson; Kalycia Trishana Watson; Alicia Lukachko; Mindy Thompson Fullilove; Myrna Weissman
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.671

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.