AIMS: Next to left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is characterized by microvascular dysfunction and reduced myocardial external efficiency (MEE). Insights into the presence of these abnormalities as early markers of disease are of clinical importance in risk stratification, and development of therapeutic approaches. Therefore, the aim was to investigate myocardial perfusion and energetics in genotype-positive, phenotype-negative HCM subjects (carriers). METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifteen carriers of an MYBPC3 mutation underwent [(15)O]water positron emission tomography (PET) to assess myocardial blood flow (MBF). [(11)C]acetate PET was performed to obtain myocardial oxygen consumption (MVO(2)). By use of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging, LV volumes and mass were defined to calculate MEE, i.e. the ratio between external work and MVO(2). Eleven healthy, genotype-negative, family relatives underwent similar scanning protocols to serve as a control group. Left ventricular mass was comparable between carriers and controls (93 ± 25 vs. 99 ± 21 g, P= 0.85), as was MBF at rest (1.19 ± 0.34 vs. 1.18 ± 0.32 mL min(-1) g(-1), P= 0.92), and during hyperaemia (3.87 ± 0.75 vs. 3.96 ± 0.86 mL min(-1) g(-1), P= 0.77). Myocardial oxygen consumption averaged 0.137 ± 0.057 mL min(-1) g(-1) in carriers and was not significantly different from controls (0.125 ± 0.043 mL min(-1) g(-1), P= 0.29). Cardiac work, however, was slightly reduced in carriers (7398 ± 1384 vs. 9139 ± 2484 mmHg mL in controls, P= 0.08). As a consequence, MEE was significantly decreased in carriers (27 ± 10 vs. 36 ± 8% in controls, P= 0.02). CONCLUSION: Carriers display reduced myocardial work generation in relation to oxygen consumption, in the absence of hypertrophy and flow abnormalities. Hence, impaired myocardial energetics may constitute a primary component of HCM pathogenesis.
AIMS: Next to left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is characterized by microvascular dysfunction and reduced myocardial external efficiency (MEE). Insights into the presence of these abnormalities as early markers of disease are of clinical importance in risk stratification, and development of therapeutic approaches. Therefore, the aim was to investigate myocardial perfusion and energetics in genotype-positive, phenotype-negative HCM subjects (carriers). METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifteen carriers of an MYBPC3 mutation underwent [(15)O]water positron emission tomography (PET) to assess myocardial blood flow (MBF). [(11)C]acetate PET was performed to obtain myocardial oxygen consumption (MVO(2)). By use of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging, LV volumes and mass were defined to calculate MEE, i.e. the ratio between external work and MVO(2). Eleven healthy, genotype-negative, family relatives underwent similar scanning protocols to serve as a control group. Left ventricular mass was comparable between carriers and controls (93 ± 25 vs. 99 ± 21 g, P= 0.85), as was MBF at rest (1.19 ± 0.34 vs. 1.18 ± 0.32 mL min(-1) g(-1), P= 0.92), and during hyperaemia (3.87 ± 0.75 vs. 3.96 ± 0.86 mL min(-1) g(-1), P= 0.77). Myocardial oxygen consumption averaged 0.137 ± 0.057 mL min(-1) g(-1) in carriers and was not significantly different from controls (0.125 ± 0.043 mL min(-1) g(-1), P= 0.29). Cardiac work, however, was slightly reduced in carriers (7398 ± 1384 vs. 9139 ± 2484 mmHg mL in controls, P= 0.08). As a consequence, MEE was significantly decreased in carriers (27 ± 10 vs. 36 ± 8% in controls, P= 0.02). CONCLUSION: Carriers display reduced myocardial work generation in relation to oxygen consumption, in the absence of hypertrophy and flow abnormalities. Hence, impaired myocardial energetics may constitute a primary component of HCM pathogenesis.
Authors: Jolanda van der Velden; Carolyn Y Ho; Jil C Tardiff; Iacopo Olivotto; Bjorn C Knollmann; Lucie Carrier Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2015-01-28 Impact factor: 10.787
Authors: Paul J M Wijnker; Vasco Sequeira; Diederik W D Kuster; Jolanda van der Velden Journal: Antioxid Redox Signal Date: 2018-04-11 Impact factor: 8.401
Authors: Sara Ranjbarvaziri; Kristina B Kooiker; Mathew Ellenberger; Giovanni Fajardo; Mingming Zhao; Alison Schroer Vander Roest; Rahel A Woldeyes; Tiffany T Koyano; Robyn Fong; Ning Ma; Lei Tian; Gavin M Traber; Frandics Chan; John Perrino; Sushma Reddy; Wah Chiu; Joseph C Wu; Joseph Y Woo; Kathleen M Ruppel; James A Spudich; Michael P Snyder; Kévin Contrepois; Daniel Bernstein Journal: Circulation Date: 2021-10-21 Impact factor: 39.918
Authors: David Ng; Jennifer J Johnston; Jamie K Teer; Larry N Singh; Lindsey C Peller; Jamila S Wynter; Katie L Lewis; David N Cooper; Peter D Stenson; James C Mullikin; Leslie G Biesecker Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Genet Date: 2013-07-16
Authors: Shiv Kumar Viswanathan; Megan J Puckelwartz; Ashish Mehta; Chrishan J A Ramachandra; Aravindakshan Jagadeesan; Regina Fritsche-Danielson; Ratan V Bhat; Philip Wong; Sangeetha Kandoi; Jennifer A Schwanekamp; Gina Kuffel; Lorenzo L Pesce; Michael J Zilliox; U Nalla B Durai; Rama Shanker Verma; Robert E Molokie; Domodhar P Suresh; Philip R Khoury; Annie Thomas; Thriveni Sanagala; Hak Chiaw Tang; Richard C Becker; Ralph Knöll; Winston Shim; Elizabeth M McNally; Sakthivel Sadayappan Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 14.676
Authors: Jil C Tardiff; Lucie Carrier; Donald M Bers; Corrado Poggesi; Cecilia Ferrantini; Raffaele Coppini; Lars S Maier; Houman Ashrafian; Sabine Huke; Jolanda van der Velden Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2015-01-29 Impact factor: 10.787
Authors: Johanna Kuusisto; Vesa Kärjä; Petri Sipola; Ivana Kholová; Keijo Peuhkurinen; Pertti Jääskeläinen; Anita Naukkarinen; Seppo Ylä-Herttuala; Kari Punnonen; Markku Laakso Journal: Heart Date: 2012-03-24 Impact factor: 5.994