Literature DB >> 22020461

RGDS-fuctionalized alginates improve the survival rate of encapsulated embryonic stem cells during cryopreservation.

S Sambu1, X Xu, H A Schiffer, Z F Cui, H Ye.   

Abstract

Cryopreservation of stem cells, especially embryonic stem cells, is problematic because of low post-thaw cell survival rates and spontaneous differentiation following recovery. In this investigation, mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) were encapsulated in arginine-glycine-aspartic acid-serine (RGDS)-coupled calcium alginates (1.2 percent, w/v), allowed to attach to the substratum and then cryopreserved in 10 percent (v/v) dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) solution at a slow cooling rate of 1 C per min. RGDS coupling to alginate was confirmed by Transmission Fourier Transform Infra-Red spectroscopy (T-FTIR) and quantified by using ninhydrin-Ultraviolet/Visible light (ninhydrin-UV/VIS) assay. Flow cytometry data showed that mESCs cryopreserved in RGDS-alginate beads had a higher expression of stem cell markers compared with cells cryopreserved in suspension or cells cryopreserved in unmodified alginates. Cell viability after thawing was assessed using trypan blue exclusion assay and monitored using Alamar blue assay for 6 hours. It was shown that post-thaw cell survival rate was significantly higher for cells encapsulated in RGDS-modified alginate (93 ± 2 percent, mean and standard error) than those in suspension (52 ± 2 percent) or in unmodified alginates (62 ± 3 percent). These results showed that cells encapsulated and attached to a substratum have better survival rate and stem cell marker expression 24 hours after cryopreservation than those in suspension. Encapsulation in RGDS-alginate was optimized for peptide concentration, cryoprotective agent loading time and cooling rate. The best result was obtained when using 12.5 mg peptide per g alginate, 30 minutes loading time and 1 C per min cooling rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22020461

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cryo Letters        ISSN: 0143-2044            Impact factor:   1.066


  8 in total

1.  Rationally optimized cryopreservation of multiple mouse embryonic stem cell lines: II--Mathematical prediction and experimental validation of optimal cryopreservation protocols.

Authors:  Corinna M Kashuba; James D Benson; John K Critser
Journal:  Cryobiology       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 2.487

Review 2.  Chemical approaches to cryopreservation.

Authors:  Kathryn A Murray; Matthew I Gibson
Journal:  Nat Rev Chem       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 34.571

3.  Cryopreservation effects on recombinant myoblasts encapsulated in adhesive alginate hydrogels.

Authors:  Hajira F Ahmad; Athanassios Sambanis
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 8.947

4.  A Bayesian approach to optimizing cryopreservation protocols.

Authors:  Sammy Sambu
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Effect of Substrate Topography and Chemistry on Human Mesenchymal Stem Cell Markers: A Transcriptome Study.

Authors:  Bo Zhang; Naresh Kasoju; Qiongfang Li; Jinmin Ma; Aidong Yang; Zhanfeng Cui; Hui Wang; Hua Ye
Journal:  Int J Stem Cells       Date:  2019-03-30       Impact factor: 2.500

6.  Oxidized alginate hydrogels as niche environments for corneal epithelial cells.

Authors:  Bernice Wright; Paul A De Bank; Kim A Luetchford; Fernando R Acosta; Che J Connon
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 4.396

7.  Effects of Cryopreservation on Cell Metabolic Activity and Function of Biofabricated Structures Laden with Osteoblasts.

Authors:  Laura G Hernández-Tapia; Zdenka Fohlerová; Jan Žídek; Marco A Alvarez-Perez; Ladislav Čelko; Jozef Kaiser; Edgar B Montufar
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 8.  Hydrogel Cryopreservation System: An Effective Method for Cell Storage.

Authors:  Chaocan Zhang; Youliang Zhou; Li Zhang; Lili Wu; Yanjun Chen; Dong Xie; Wanyu Chen
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 5.923

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.