BACKGROUND: The confirmation of diagnosis of the Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) relies on laboratory tests. Current classification criteria for definite APS mandate the use of three "standardized" laboratory assays to detect antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) [viz: anticardiolipin (aCL) IgG and IgM, anti-β(2)glycoprotein I (anti-β(2)GPI) antibodies IgG and IgM and/or a lupus anticoagulant (LAC)], when at least one of the two major clinical manifestations (thrombosis or pregnancy losses) are present. Several attempts have been made to standardize the aCL and anti-β(2)GPI tests, though, a considerable degree of inconsistencies still exist, limiting the clinical and diagnostic value of aPL tests. Among the areas of concern are the type and source of calibrant material, the lack of proper validated reference material and of universal units of measurement, particularly for anti-β(2)GPI antibodies. CONTENT: A Task Force of scientists and leaders in the field from different countries - discussed and analyzed those critical questions in an evidence-based manner and further discussed and made recommendations at a workshop that was conducted during 13th International Congress on Antiphospholipid Antibodies (APLA 2010, April 13-16, 2010, Galveston, TX). SUMMARY: This concise report summarizes the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the task force and preconference workshop. The group recommended to ensure the availability of properly prepared and validated polyclonal and monoclonal antibody reference materials for both assays, to continue reporting the aCL assay in GPL/MPL units and to establish consensus international units of measurement for anti-β(2)GPI antibodies.
BACKGROUND: The confirmation of diagnosis of the Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) relies on laboratory tests. Current classification criteria for definite APS mandate the use of three "standardized" laboratory assays to detect antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) [viz: anticardiolipin (aCL) IgG and IgM, anti-β(2)glycoprotein I (anti-β(2)GPI) antibodies IgG and IgM and/or a lupus anticoagulant (LAC)], when at least one of the two major clinical manifestations (thrombosis or pregnancy losses) are present. Several attempts have been made to standardize the aCL and anti-β(2)GPI tests, though, a considerable degree of inconsistencies still exist, limiting the clinical and diagnostic value of aPL tests. Among the areas of concern are the type and source of calibrant material, the lack of proper validated reference material and of universal units of measurement, particularly for anti-β(2)GPI antibodies. CONTENT: A Task Force of scientists and leaders in the field from different countries - discussed and analyzed those critical questions in an evidence-based manner and further discussed and made recommendations at a workshop that was conducted during 13th International Congress on Antiphospholipid Antibodies (APLA 2010, April 13-16, 2010, Galveston, TX). SUMMARY: This concise report summarizes the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the task force and preconference workshop. The group recommended to ensure the availability of properly prepared and validated polyclonal and monoclonal antibody reference materials for both assays, to continue reporting the aCL assay in GPL/MPL units and to establish consensus international units of measurement for anti-β(2)GPI antibodies.
Authors: Pier Luigi Meroni; Martina Biggioggero; Silvia S Pierangeli; Joanna Sheldon; Ingrid Zegers; Maria Orietta Borghi Journal: Nat Rev Rheumatol Date: 2013-11-26 Impact factor: 20.543
Authors: Leonie Pelkmans; Hilde Kelchtermans; Philip G de Groot; Stephane Zuily; Veronique Regnault; Denis Wahl; Vittorio Pengo; Bas de Laat Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-08-12 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Pavla Bradacova; Ludek Slavik; Jana Ulehlova; Adela Skoumalova; Jana Ullrychova; Jana Prochazkova; Antonin Hlusi; Gayane Manukyan; Eva Kriegova Journal: Biomedicines Date: 2021-02-08
Authors: Pavla Bradáčová; Luděk Slavík; Adéla Skoumalová; Jana Úlehlová; Eva Kriegová; Gayane Manukyan; David Friedecký; Barbora Piskláková; Jana Ullrychová; Jana Procházková; Antonín Hluší Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2022-08-11 Impact factor: 6.208
Authors: Dirk Roggenbuck; Maria Orietta Borghi; Valentina Somma; Thomas Büttner; Peter Schierack; Katja Hanack; Claudia Grossi; Caterina Bodio; Paolo Macor; Philipp von Landenberg; Francesco Boccellato; Michael Mahler; Pier Luigi Meroni Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2016-05-21 Impact factor: 5.156